Current Biology
Volume 30, Issue 13, 6 July 2020, Pages 2508-2519.e6
Journal home page for Current Biology

Article
Non-canonical Receptive Field Properties and Neuromodulation of Feature-Detecting Neurons in Flies

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.04.069Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open access

Highlights

  • LC12 and LC15 are ON-OFF visual feature detectors

  • LC15 responds to moving bars, whereas LC12 responds to objects of any size

  • Object responses from both LCs are suppressed when the background is moving

  • Octopamine restores object responses in LC12 and LC15 against a moving background

Summary

Several fundamental aspects of motion vision circuitry are prevalent across flies and mice. Both taxa segregate ON and OFF signals. For any given spatial pattern, motion detectors in both taxa are tuned to speed, selective for one of four cardinal directions, and modulated by catecholamine neurotransmitters. These similarities represent conserved, canonical properties of the functional circuits and computational algorithms for motion vision. Less is known about feature detectors, including how receptive field properties differ from the motion pathway or whether they are under neuromodulatory control to impart functional plasticity for the detection of salient objects from a moving background. Here, we investigated 19 types of putative feature selective lobula columnar (LC) neurons in the optic lobe of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster to characterize divergent properties of feature selection. We identified LC12 and LC15 as feature detectors. LC15 encodes moving bars, whereas LC12 is selective for the motion of discrete objects, mostly independent of size. Neither is selective for contrast polarity, speed, or direction, highlighting key differences in the underlying algorithms for feature detection and motion vision. We show that the onset of background motion suppresses object responses by LC12 and LC15. Surprisingly, the application of octopamine, which is released during flight, reverses the suppressive influence of background motion, rendering both LCs able to track moving objects superimposed against background motion. Our results provide a comparative framework for the function and modulation of feature detectors and new insights into the underlying neuronal mechanisms involved in visual feature detection.

Keywords

object vision
motion vision
visual processing
octopamine
lobula columnar neurons
visual projection neurons

Cited by (0)

2

Present address: School of Biological Sciences, Illinois State University, Normal, IL 61790-4120, USA

3

Present address: Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA

4

Present address: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA

5

Lead Contact