Current Biology
Volume 23, Issue 11, 3 June 2013, Pages 981-986
Journal home page for Current Biology

Report
The Timescale of Perceptual Evidence Integration Can Be Adapted to the Environment

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.04.039Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Highlights

  • Time-varying sensory signals are better detected by leaky than perfect integration

  • Performance improves when adapting the integration timescale to signal duration

  • Human observers flexibly adapt integration timescale to expected signal duration

Summary

A key computation underlying perceptual decisions is the temporal integration of “evidence” in favor of different states of the world. Studies from psychology and neuroscience have shown that observers integrate multiple samples of noisy perceptual evidence over time toward a decision [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11]. An influential model posits perfect evidence integration (i.e., without forgetting), enabling optimal decisions based on stationary evidence [2, 3, 12]. However, in real-life environments, the perceptual evidence typically changes continuously. We used a computational model to show that, under such conditions, performance can be improved by means of leaky (forgetful) integration, if the integration timescale is adapted toward the predominant signal duration. We then tested whether human observers employ such an adaptive integration process. Observers had to detect visual luminance “signals” of variable strength, duration, and onset latency, embedded within longer streams of noise. Different sessions entailed predominantly short or long signals. The rate of performance improvement as a function of signal duration indicated that observers indeed changed their integration timescale with the predominant signal duration, in accordance with the adaptive integration account. Our findings establish that leaky integration of perceptual evidence is flexible and that cognitive control mechanisms can exploit this flexibility for optimizing the decision process.

Cited by (0)

7

Co-first authors

8

Co-senior authors