Elsevier

Current Opinion in Psychology

Volume 3, June 2015, Pages 100-107
Current Opinion in Psychology

Putting emotion regulation in context

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.03.022Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We review the 19 articles included in this Special Issue on emotion regulation.

  • We do so by focusing on the role that context plays in this process.

  • We suggest directions for future research.

In this commentary, we discuss the 19 review articles that encompass this Special Issue of Current Opinion in Psychology on the topic of Emotion Regulation. Given the growing recognition of the importance of contextual factors in determining how emotions are experienced and regulated (1), we adopt a contextual framework to organize our commentary. To that end, we discuss how each of the topics covered in the articles fit within the four contextual components of emotion regulation: (1) characteristics of the organism carrying out the regulation; (2) features of the emotion-eliciting stimuli and/or situations; (3) implementation of regulatory processes; and (4) types of outcomes. We then provide recommendations for future research. We hope that this Special Issue, and the future directions discussed in this commentary, can stimulate further research in the already fast growing area of emotion regulation and context.

Section snippets

Developmental stage

One of the major contextual dimensions that play a role in how emotions are experienced and regulated is developmental stage (e.g. [7, 8, 9]). In this respect, Kiel and Kalomiris (this issue) reviewed the literature on parental influences on children's emotion regulation. They discussed recent research suggesting that fathers (i.e., not just mothers) also play a significant role in the development of children's emotion regulation skills and that this contribution may become more pronounced as

Laboratory studies

Turning to examinations of the features of emotion eliciting situations, Seeley et al. (this issue) highlighted the importance of developing paradigms to maximize the external validity of laboratory-based studies. In particular, they advocated for the utilization of inductions that focus on idiographic processes, such as worry, rumination, and self-criticism. They also emphasized the importance of generating complex emotional states in the laboratory (rather than focusing on the elicitation of

Automaticity

In terms of emotion regulation implementation, Koole et al. (this issue) discussed implicit processes by introducing the action control model of emotion regulation (e.g. [23]). According to this model, emotion regulation consists of firstly, determining the need to regulate, secondly, deciding on which strategies to use, and thirdly,) implementing such strategies (for similar approaches, see [2, 3, 5]). Koole et al. (this issue) suggested that implicit processes have a powerful impact on each

Short-term versus long-term emotional and behavioral outcomes

To date, the majority of studies on emotion regulation have focused on changes in subjective experience, physiological arousal, neural activity, and expressive behavior (e.g. [1]). As a result, very little is known about the effects of this process on goal-driven motivated behaviors. This is problematic because the enactment of certain behaviors can hinder individuals’ adaptation to the environment. In fact, dysregulated behaviors are central to most mental disorders [32, 33, 34]. Weiss et al. (

Conclusion

To conclude our commentary, we would like to summarize the key future directions we discussed. First, we emphasized the importance of clearly conceptualizing the distinction between emotion regulation abilities and strategies and of delineating their bidirectional relationship over the course of development. Second, we highlighted the central role that that interpersonal processes play in the experience and regulation of emotions. In this respect, it will be critical to systematically model

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Kara Christensen and Ilana Seager for their feedback on earlier versions of this manuscript.

References (35)

  • J.J. Gross

    Emotion regulation: current status and future prospects

    Psychol Inq

    (2015)
  • P. Cole

    Moving ahead in the study of the development of emotion regulation

    Int J Behav Dev

    (2014)
  • N. Eisenberg et al.

    The relations of regulation and emotionality to children's externalizing and internalizing problem behavior

    Child Dev

    (2001)
  • P. Zimmerman et al.

    New directions in developmental emotion regulation research across the life span: Introduction to the special section

    Int J Behav Dev

    (2014)
  • E.A. Butler

    Temporal interpersonal emotion systems: the ‘TIES’ that form relationships

    Pers Soc Psychol B

    (2011)
  • S.G. Hofmann

    Interpersonal emotion regulation model of mood and anxiety disorders

    Cogn Ther Res

    (2014)
  • J. Zaki et al.

    Interpersonal emotion regulation

    Emot

    (2013)
  • Cited by (40)

    • Alexithymia and emotion regulation

      2023, Journal of Affective Disorders
      Citation Excerpt :

      At the identification stage, people high in alexithymia should likely be making poorer decisions about whether and how to regulate their emotions. This is important because contexts differ in terms of whether emotion regulation is needed, or whether such regulation should involve the down- or up-regulation of emotion (e.g., Aldao and Tull, 2015). At the selection stage, people high in alexithymia should likely be worse at selecting adaptive strategies optimally suited to their needs.

    • Reappraisal and empathic perspective-taking – More alike than meets the eyes

      2022, NeuroImage
      Citation Excerpt :

      The use of emotion regulation and empathy are context-dependent (Aldao and Tull, 2015; Gonzalez-Liencres et al., 2013). Characteristics of individuals (e.g., personality traits, experience, age, etc.), the specific emotion involved, as well as the context in which an interaction occurs between individuals, will influence which processes are implemented and what are the emotional and behavioral outcomes (Aldao and Tull, 2015; Zaki, 2014). In addition, emotion regulation and empathy are motivated phenomena; an observer or an agent is driven to reduce or intensify empathy or emotional responses (Tamir et al., 2020; Zaki, 2014).

    • Influence of suppression and reappraisal on eating-related symptoms and ruminative thinking in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa

      2021, Behaviour Research and Therapy
      Citation Excerpt :

      A replication of the results via the EMA method would therefore be desirable. It is crucial to mention that new research points to the functionality of ER strategies as being determined by situational context as well as an individual ’s personal goal and values (Aldao, 2013; Aldao & Tull, 2015). In light of this, ER strategies such as expressive suppression may be regarded as useful in specific situations that call for it (e.g., job interviews).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text