Elsevier

Chemosphere

Volume 122, March 2015, Pages 206-212
Chemosphere

Mercury methylation coupled to iron reduction by dissimilatory iron-reducing bacteria

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.11.054Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Iron reduction occurred with DIRB. Hg(II) restrained dissimilatory Fe(III) reduction.

  • Mercury methylation could be mediated by iron-reducing bacteria (DIRB).

  • Mercury methylation rate was positively correlated with iron reduction rate.

Abstract

Iron reduction and mercury methylation by dissimilatory iron-reducing bacteria (DIRB), Geobacter sulfurreducens and Shewanella oneidensis, were studied, and the relationship of mercury methylation coupled to iron reduction was determined. The ability of both bacteria for reducing iron was tested, and Fe(III) reduction occurred with the highest rate when ferric oxyhydroxide was used as a terminal electron acceptor. G. sulfurreducens had proven to mediate the production of methylmercury (MeHg), and a notable increase of MeHg following the addition of inorganic Hg was observed. When the initial concentration of HgCl2 was 500 nM, about 177.03 nM of MeHg was determined at 8 d after G. sulfurreducens inoculation. S. oneidensis was tested negligible for Hg methylation and only 12.06 nM of MeHg was determined. Iron reduction could potentially influence Hg methylation rates. The increase in MeHg was consistent with high rate of iron reduction, indicating that Fe(III) reduction stimulated the formation of MeHg. Furthermore, the net MeHg concentration increased at low Fe(III) additions from 1.78 to 3.57 mM, and then decreased when the added Fe(III) was high from 7.14 to 17.85 mM. The mercury methylation rate was suppressed with high Fe(III) additions, which might have been attributable to mercury complexation and low availability.

Introduction

Mercury (Hg) pollution has become a global concern due to its toxic properties. It contaminates water sources through atmospheric deposition, weathering of cinnabar, runoff from industrial sites and abandoned mines, and microbial production of acid mine drainage (Wiener et al., 2006). The greatest potential human health concern of Hg is the conversion of inorganic Hg to organic Hg compounds such as methylmercury (MeHg), which bioaccumulates in aquatic organisms and is a neurotoxin that damages the central nervous system in humans (Fitzgerald and Clarkson, 1991, Scheulhammer et al., 2007, Huguet et al., 2010). MeHg is highly toxic and actually more toxic than any other Hg species, such as elemental mercury (Hg0) and mercuric ion (Hg(II)) (Fitzgerald and Clarkson, 1991), and bioaccumulative through the food chain. In addition, MeHg is water soluble, and readily transferred from sediment to water, and then to biota such as fish (Hammerschmidt et al., 2006, Lin and Jay, 2007).

MeHg concentrations in most sediments are controlled by in situ net microbial methylation (Benoit et al., 2003, Hammerschmidt and Fitzgerald, 2004). Environmental mercury methylation is an anaerobic microbial process generally driven by dissimilatory sulfate-reducing bacteria (DSRB) (Benoit et al., 2003) and magnified in organic rich sediments (Gray and Hines, 2009). Extensive research has linked sulfate-reducing with Hg methylation in a wide range of aquatic systems (Biswas et al., 2011, Bridou et al., 2011, Compeau and Bartha, 1985, Gilmour et al., 1998, Gilmour et al., 2011). Under sulfidic conditions in the presence of millimolar amounts of dissolved sulfide in organic-compound-rich marine sediments, rapid MeHg accumulation is coupled to fast sulfate reduction. In a field experiment, the addition of sulfate is shown to enhance the total concentration of MeHg in a sediment (Gilmour et al., 1998), which is interpreted as a net production of MeHg mediated by the activity of DSRB.

Although Hg methylation have been investigated in a variety of sedimentary environments under sulfate-reducing and methanogenic conditions, little is known about the capacity for microbial Hg transformation in sediments dominated by other terminal electron accepting processes (TEAP). Several studies have examined microbial Hg transformation in sediments amended with other potential electron acceptors such as nitrate, Fe(III), and Mn(IV) (Gilmour et al., 1998, Han et al., 2008), but these studies do not deal with whether these substrates are utilized as electron acceptors by microorganisms in the sediment.

The redox cycling of iron plays a major role in the biogeochemical cycling of many elements in natural systems (Lovley and Phillips, 1986, Liu et al., 2001, Salas et al., 2010). On the reductive side of the iron redox cycle, the dissimilatory microbial reduction of iron oxides has a major impact on the aqueous/solid phase geochemistry and behavior of natural compounds and contaminants in nonsulfidogenic subsurface sedimentary environments. Because these sediments contain iron minerals and the reduction of iron is the dominant TEAP, methylation is postulated to be due to the activity of iron-reducing bacteria. However, earlier pure-culture studies offer limited support for this hypothesis (Warner et al., 2003).

Recent research suggests that dissimilatory iron-reducing bacteria (DIRB) may play a role in environmental methylation (Warner et al., 2003, Fleming et al., 2006). Three strains of iron-reducing bacteria have been reported to methylate mercury at apparent rates similar to those reported for active sulfate reducers (kerin et al., 2006). Fleming et al. (2006) indicate that the sediments from Clear Lake, CA, which contain dissolved iron and show the signatures of iron reduction, continue to produce MeHg even in the presence of molybdate concentrations sufficient to fully inhibit sulfate reduction. The iron-reducing bacterium isolated from these sediments, Geobacter sp. strain CLFeRB, is able to methylate mercury in pure cultures at the rates comparable to those of sulfate-reducing bacteria.

In the present study, we aimed to screen a phylogenetically diverse group of DIRB cultures for Hg-methylating capability in order to provide insights into in situ biological methylation controls and to further investigate the phylogenetic distribution of methylating bacteria. Two well-characterized iron-reducing bacteria, Geobacter sulfurreducens PCA and Shewanella oneidensis MR-1, were employed in Fe(III) reduction and mercury methylation experiments.

Section snippets

Chemicals

Mercuric chloride (HgCl2, purity >95%) and methylmercury (MeHg, purity >95%) standards were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). A stock solution was prepared with MeHg dissolving into methanol, and stored in brown bottles at 4 °C. Methanol was chromatographically pure; water was Mili-Q ultrapure; and the other reagents were of analytical grade.

Bacterium sources

Geobacter sulfurreducens PCA and Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 were provided by Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). The bacteria were inoculated

The ability of DIRB to reduce different forms of iron

Dissimilatory reductions of different forms of iron by DIRB are showed in Fig. 1. The occurrence of free soluble ferrous iron emphasized the potentially high rates of iron reduction. Reduction of Fe(III) could be controlled by either abiotic chemical reactions or through metal-reducing bacteria. The iron-reducing bacteria G. sulfurreducens and S. oneidensis, via the reduction of Fe(III), increased aqueous concentrations of Fe(II) (Fig. 1), and this reaction was sensitive to iron forms. The

Discussion

Dissimilatory iron reduction is becoming increasingly recognized as an influential process in certain iron-rich marine and freshwater sediments in general, where up to 50–70% of buried organic carbon can be oxidized via this process (Lovley and Phillips, 1986, Jensen et al., 2003). The possibility that solid-phase ferric iron is an electron acceptor that is important for microbial methylation of mercury may change the situation under which we investigate the vertical distribution of mercury

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (40971182, 41171254), and the Project of Agricultural Public Welfare Scientific Research (201303101-06).

References (48)

  • J.M. Benoit et al.

    Sulfide controls on mercury speciation and bioavailability to methylating bacteria in sediment pore waters

    Environ. Sci. Technol.

    (1999)
  • J.M. Benoit et al.

    Aspects of bioavailability of mercury for methylation in pure cultures of Desulfobulbus propionicus (1pr3)

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.

    (2001)
  • J.M. Benoit et al.

    The influence of sulfide on solid-phase mercury bioavailability for methylation by pure cultures of Desulfobulbus propionicus (1pr3)

    Environ. Sci. Technol.

    (2001)
  • J.M. Benoit et al.

    Geochemical and biological controls over methylmercury production and degradation in aquatic ecosystems

    Am. Chem. Soc. Symp. Ser.

    (2003)
  • R. Bridou et al.

    Simultaneous determination of mercury methylation and demethylation capacities of various sulfate-reducing bacteria using species-specific isotopic tracers

    Environ. Toxicol. Chem.

    (2011)
  • G.C. Compeau et al.

    Sulfate-reducing bacteria: principle methylators of mercury in anoxic estuarine sediment

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.

    (1985)
  • W.F. Fitzgerald et al.

    Mercury and monomethylmercury: present and future concerns

    Environ. Health Persp.

    (1991)
  • E.J. Fleming et al.

    Mercury methylation from unexpected sources: molybdate-inhibited freshwater sediments and an iron-reducing bacterium

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.

    (2006)
  • C.C. Gilmour et al.

    Methylmercury concentrations and production rates across a trophic gradient in the northern Everglades

    Biogeochemistry

    (1998)
  • C.C. Gilmour et al.

    Sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfovibrio desulfuricans ND132 as a model for understanding bacterial mercury methylation

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.

    (2011)
  • C.C. Gilmour et al.

    Mercury methylation by novel microorganisms from new environments

    Environ. Sci. Technol.

    (2013)
  • C.R. Hammerschmidt et al.

    Geochemical controls on the production and distribution of methylmercury in near-shore marine sediments

    Environ. Sci. Technol.

    (2004)
  • C.R. Hammerschmidt et al.

    Biogeochemical cycling of methylmercury in lakes and tundra watersheds of Arctic Alaska

    Environ. Sci. Technol.

    (2006)
  • T.A. Jackson

    The influence of clay minerals, oxides and humic matter on the methylation and demethylation of mercury by micro-organisms in freshwater sediments

    Appl. Organomet. Chem.

    (1989)
  • Cited by (59)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text