Elsevier

Catalysis Today

Volume 205, 30 April 2013, Pages 101-105
Catalysis Today

Ambient-pressure photoelectron spectroscopy for heterogeneous catalysis and electrochemistry

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2012.08.005Get rights and content

Abstract

We describe the design and capabilities of a new ambient-pressure X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy system at the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource. A unique feature of this system is that samples are illuminated at grazing incidence and with a tightly focused beam, which allows a 50 μm aperture to be placed in the first differential pumping stage of the lens system of the electron spectrometer. The low conductance of the aperture enables surface-sensitive electron spectroscopy of solid surfaces, liquids, and solid–liquid interfaces to be performed operando at pressures as high as 100 Torr. The instrument can also be used to obtain polarization-resolved X-ray absorption spectra using Auger-electron-yield detection. Results for Pt surfaces in ambient-pressure gas environments and for liquid water are presented.

Highlights

► A new APXPS system is in operation at SSRL. ► XPS measurements can be performed in 100 Torr gas ambient. ► Solid–liquid interfaces and liquid surfaces can be investigated. ► Grazing X-ray incidence can be advantageous; the gas phase signal is less pronounced. ► Hydroxyl species on Pt(1 1 1) can be stabilized in ambient conditions.

Introduction

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) has many advantages compared with other techniques that probe surface chemistry and heterogeneous catalysis [1], [2], [3], [4]. It is, for example, element specific and provides information about the chemical state of systems through chemical shifts [5]. Importantly, XPS is also surface sensitive, because photoelectrons with kinetic energies between 100 and 1400 eV typically have inelastic mean free paths less than 20 Å in condensed media. A related disadvantage, however, is that conventional XPS measurements require ultra-high vacuum conditions (P < 1 × 10−8 Torr) to minimize scattering of emitted photoelectrons by gases and to prevent discharges on the electrostatic lens elements and the detectors, whereas many processes of interest in catalysis and electrochemistry take place at elevated pressure (>760 Torr) and temperature. This limitation was partially circumvented by the development of ambient-pressure XPS (APXPS), which began in the early 1980s [6] but later accelerated with the advent of third-generation synchrotron facilities [4]. Today, several synchrotron-based instruments allow XPS measurements at gas pressures of up to a few Torr. Concomitant improvements in conventional X-ray sources have also led to recent efforts to develop laboratory-based instruments for ambient-pressure spectroscopy [7], [8].

The basic design principle of ambient-pressure electron spectrometers is straightforward: a small aperture limits the conductance between a gas cell containing the sample and a differentially pumped electron-energy analyzer. Samples are placed very close to the aperture to reduce the path length of the emitted photoelectrons through the ambient-pressure gas environment; typically, the sample is separated from the aperture by ∼0.1–0.5 mm, which ensures that the local pressure at the sample is the same as the background pressure in the gas cell [9].

To date, three different electrostatic focusing schemes have been employed for the lens system of ambient-pressure spectrometers: (i) a conventional lens configuration optimized for fixed working distances (typically ∼40–50 mm) [7]; (ii) an additional focusing electrostatic lens in the differential pumping scheme [10], [11]; (iii) a pre-lens section incorporated into a conventional lens design [12]. In comparison with (i), the latter two methods provide more space between the sample and the spectrometer, so that additional differential pumping stages can be incorporated without losing detection efficiency. These design considerations and related studies performed in the early development stages of the technique have been reviewed in detail [9], [10], [13] and will not be recapitulated here.

In the past decade, APXPS has been primarily used to investigate solid surfaces in near-ambient gas environments [14], [15], [16], [17]. The unique capabilities of APXPS are exemplified by recent studies of surface-oxide growth on catalytically active metal surfaces [18], [19], [20], the interaction of water with metal and metal-oxide surfaces [21], [22], [23], the surface electronic-structure of operating solid-oxide fuel cells [24], and compositional changes of bimetallic nanoparticles in oxidizing and reducing atmospheres [25]. In addition, ambient-pressure spectrometers have been used to perform X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) at the K edges of C, N and O, and at the L edges of 3d transition metals [26]; these studies provide information about the geometric structure of adlayers in equilibrium with near-ambient gas environments. It is noteworthy, however, that few of the in situ APXPS studies outlined above yielded significant additional information beyond what had been obtained from the corresponding ex situ measurements performed in UHV. These observations have encouraged researchers to improve the performance of APXPS systems, e.g., by extending the working pressure range.

In the present article, we demonstrate the capabilities of the new APXPS system now operating at beamline 13-2 at the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource (SSRL). Although the working principle is comparable to other instruments in use around the world, the design of the gas cell allows us to perform in situ measurements at pressures of up 100 Torr. The design of the new spectrometer will be described in Section 2, and applications of the new spectrometer to adsorbate systems and fuel-cell reactions will be presented in Section 3.

Section snippets

The ambient-pressure photoelectron spectroscopy instrument

The instrument, shown in Fig. 1, is composed of two separate chambers: a preparation chamber, in which surface cleaning (sputtering, annealing, etc.) and sample preparation can be performed in UHV; and a spectrometer chamber that houses a titanium gas cell with an entrance aperture to the differentially pumped lens elements of the electron-energy analyzer. The first three of five differential pumping sections are shown in Fig. 1. A sample is mounted on a rod and can be transferred between the

XPS in ambient pressure conditions

A small aperture size and a tightly focused X-ray beam play an important role in attempts to reach high pressures. Additionally, the inverse relationship between photoelectron kinetic energy and inelastic scattering events (i.e., background signal) in the gas phase can be used to enhance the signal-to-background ratio. As can be seen in Fig. 3(a), 4f states of the Pt(1 1 1) surface can be measured in the presence of rather high pressures of oxygen gas. Under the measurement conditions indicated,

Conclusions

As a result of the development of synchrotron-based APXPS methods from 2000 onwards, the number of studies on the catalytic, electrocatalytic, electronic, and geochemical properties of surfaces at equilibrium with near-ambient gas atmospheres is dramatically increasing. In this study, we have introduced a new APXPS system, which is in operation at SSRL. The sample is illuminated at grazing incidence using a tightly focused beam, which makes a small aperture possible to use. When the kinetic

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Sciences and Engineering, under contract DE-AC02-76SF00515. H.O. gratefully acknowledges the support from Precursory Research for Embryonic Science and Technology (PRESTO), Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST). This research carried out at the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory, a National User Facility operated by Stanford University on behalf of the U.S. Department of

References (35)

  • A. Nilsson

    Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena

    (2002)
  • N. Måtensson et al.

    Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena

    (1995)
  • H. Bluhm

    Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena

    (2010)
  • H. Bluhm et al.

    Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena

    (2006)
  • M. Salmeron et al.

    Surface Science Reports

    (2008)
  • A. Nilsson et al.

    Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena

    (2010)
  • L. Besley et al.

    Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics

    (1973)
  • C. Puglia et al.

    Surface Science

    (1995)
  • J.F. Weaver et al.

    Surface Science

    (2005)
  • S. Hüfner

    Photoelectron Spectroscopy

    (2003)
  • G. Somorjai

    Introduction to Surface Chemistry and Catalysis

    (1994)
  • N. Mårtensson et al.

    Applications of Synchrotron Radiation in High Resolution Studies of Molecules and Molecular Adsorbates on Surfaces

    (1994)
  • H. Siegbahn

    Journal of Physical Chemistry

    (1985)
  • J. Pantforder et al.

    Review of Scientific Instruments

    (2005)
  • F. Tao

    Chemical Communications

    (2012)
  • D.F. Ogletree et al.

    Review of Scientific Instruments

    (2002)
  • M.E. Grass et al.

    Review of Scientific Instruments

    (2010)
  • Cited by (99)

    • Spectroscopic analysis with tender X-rays: SpAnTeX, a new AP-HAXPES end-station at BESSY II

      2021, Surface Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      The breakthrough leading to the recent growth of the technique was the integration of a series of electrostatic lenses into a differential pumping system between the sample environment and the electron energy analyzer [10]. Since this development, many AP-XPS systems have been built at synchrotron facilities around the world, and laboratory-based instruments with fixed excitation energies have become more readily available from commercial manufacturers [11–29]. Modern state-of-the-art electron spectrometers are able to operate at pressures above 25 mbar (the vapor pressure of water at room temperature) and to detect photoelectron KEs up to 12 keV [16,24,30,31].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text