Elsevier

Biotechnology Advances

Volume 33, Issue 8, December 2015, Pages 1799-1813
Biotechnology Advances

Research review paper
A thermochemical–biochemical hybrid processing of lignocellulosic biomass for producing fuels and chemicals

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.10.006Get rights and content

Abstract

Thermochemical–biological hybrid processing uses thermochemical decomposition of lignocellulosic biomass to produce a variety of intermediate compounds that can be converted into fuels and chemicals through microbial fermentation. It represents a unique opportunity for biomass conversion as it mitigates some of the deficiencies of conventional biochemical (pretreatment–hydrolysis–fermentation) and thermochemical (pyrolysis or gasification) processing. Thermochemical–biological hybrid processing includes two pathways: (i) pyrolysis/pyrolytic substrate fermentation, and (ii) gasification/syngas fermentation. This paper provides a comprehensive review of these two hybrid processing pathways, including the characteristics of fermentative substrates produced in the thermochemical stage and microbial utilization of these compounds in the fermentation stage. The current challenges of these two biomass conversion pathways include toxicity of the crude pyrolytic substrates, the inhibition of raw syngas contaminants, and the mass-transfer limitations in syngas fermentation. Possible approaches for mitigating substrate toxicities are discussed. The review also provides a summary of the current efforts to commercialize hybrid processing.

Section snippets

Introduction: hybrid processing and its advantages

Producing fuels and chemicals from lignocellulosic biomass has been traditionally achieved through two platform technologies. The first is the biochemical process in which the biomass is converted into reducing sugars through pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis followed by microbial fermentation into fuel products. The second is the thermochemical process in which biomass is treated by gasification or pyrolysis for producing intermediates such as syngas or bio-oil, which are further upgraded

Fast pyrolysis of biomass for pyrolytic substrates production

Fast pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass is a thermochemical decomposition of the biomass materials, in the absence of oxygen, that produces an energy rich liquid (bio-oil), a flammable gas mixture (syngas), and a carbon- and nutrient-rich solid (biochar) (Bridgwater and Peacocke, 2000, Oasmaa and Czernik, 1999). Bio-oil is a liquid mixture approximately containing (based on dry weight of biomass) 15 wt.% carboxylic acids, 25 wt.% sugars, 4 wt.% alcohols, 10 wt.% aldehydes, 2 wt.% esters, 7 wt.%

Pyrolytic sugars

Levoglucosan as a fermentative substrate can be hydrolyzed into glucose or directly metabolized. Acid-hydrolyzed levoglucosan has been used as a substrate for yeasts and fungi to produce ethanol or lipids (Table 1). This method, however, can result in some sugar loss during the neutralization of the acid hydrolysate (Sluiter et al., 2012). Some microorganisms can utilize levoglucosan naturally as the sole carbon and energy source (Table 2). Levoglucosan kinase (lgk) is the key enzyme for these

Toxicity of crude pyrolytic substrates

The toxicity of the contaminant compounds in crude pyrolytic substrate is the major challenge in the pyrolysis-fermentation hybrid process. Crude pyrolytic substrate stream is a highly heterogeneous mixture containing hundreds of chemical compounds (Ruddy et al., 2014). Some of the compounds may lead to severe inhibitions. For example, compounds such as organic acids, furfural, and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (5-HMF) have been well-known for inhibiting the growth and fermentation of ethanologenic

Efforts in commercialization of hybrid process

Despite much research having been conducted, the hybrid process based on the pyrolysis- fermentation pathway remains in its infancy. Considering the fact that production of pyrolytic sugar appears to be economically viable (Zhang et al., 2013b) and the tremendous progress that has been made on microbial engineering (Peralta-Yahya et al., 2012), pyrolytic sugar fermentation holds great promise for the production of fuels and chemicals.

Compared to the pyrolysis-fermentation pathway, the

Conclusion and perspectives

This paper provides a comprehensive review of two thermochemical–biochemical hybrid processes (pyrolysis-fermentation, gasification-fermentation) including their features, challenges and mitigating strategies. The hybrid processing provides an alternative platform for efficient production of biofuels and commodities from lignocellulosic biomass.

Fast pyrolysis produces fermentable pyrolytic sugars, carboxylic acids and lignin derivatives, which can be utilized by microorganisms to produce

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the NSF Process and Reaction Engineering (CBET-1438042), NSF Energy for Sustainability (CBET-1133319), and NSF Iowa ESPCoR, Iowa Energy Center (#11-02) for the financial support of this project.

References (253)

  • P. Cote et al.

    Hollow fiber membrane life in membrane bioreactors (MBR)

    Desalination

    (2012)
  • G. Dobele et al.

    Pre-treatment of biomass with phosphoric acid prior to fast pyrolysis — a promising method for obtaining 1,6-anhydrosaccharides in high yields

    J Anal Appl Pyrol.

    (2003)
  • G. Dobele et al.

    Application of catalysts for obtaining 1,6-anhydrosaccharides from cellulose and wood by fast pyrolysis

    J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis

    (2005)
  • G. Dobele et al.

    Cellulose dehydration and depolymerization reactions during pyrolysis in the presence of phosphoric acid

    J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis

    (1999)
  • H.L. Drake et al.

    Physiology of the thermophilic acetogen Moorella thermoacetica

    Res. Microbiol.

    (2004)
  • M.E. Dry

    The Fischer–Tropsch process: 1950–2000

    Catal. Today

    (2002)
  • A.G. Fast et al.

    Stoichiometric and energetic analyses of non-photosynthetic CO2-fixation pathways to support synthetic biology strategies for production of fuels and chemicals

    Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng.

    (2012)
  • A.G. Fast et al.

    Acetogenic mixotrophy: novel options for yield improvement in biofuels and biochemicals production

    Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.

    (2015)
  • Q. Fei et al.

    The effect of volatile fatty acids as a sole carbon source on lipid accumulation by Cryptococcus albidus for biodiesel production

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2011)
  • P. Fontanille et al.

    Bioconversion of volatile fatty acids into lipids by the oleaginous yeast Yarrowia lipolytica

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2012)
  • A.J. Grethlein et al.

    Evidence of production of n-butanol from carbon monoxide by Butyribacterium methylotrophicum

    J. Ferment. Bioeng.

    (1991)
  • T. Gutierrez et al.

    Purification and characterization of a furfural reductase (FFR) from Escherichia coli strain LYO1–an enzyme important in the detoxification of furfural during ethanol production

    J. Biotechnol.

    (2006)
  • S.J. Ha et al.

    Energetic benefits and rapid cellobiose fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae expressing cellobiose phosphorylase and mutant cellodextrin transporters

    Metab. Eng.

    (2013)
  • S. Helle et al.

    A kinetic model for production of glucose by hydrolysis of levoglucosan and cellobiosan from pyrolysis oil

    Carbohydr. Res.

    (2007)
  • A.M. Henstra et al.

    Microbiology of synthesis gas fermentation for biofuel production

    Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.

    (2007)
  • K.M. Hurst et al.

    Carbon monoxide partial pressure effects on the metabolic process of syngas fermentation

    Biochem. Eng. J.

    (2010)
  • L.R. Jarboe et al.

    Engineering inhibitor tolerance for the production of biorenewable fuels and chemicals

    Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng.

    (2011)
  • C.W. Johnson et al.

    Aromatic catabolic pathway selection for optimal production of pyruvate and lactate from lignin

    Metab. Eng.

    (2015)
  • N. Kantarci et al.

    Bubble column reactors

    Process Biochem.

    (2005)
  • R.K. Kapoor et al.

    Applications of Trametes versicolor crude culture filtrates in detoxification of biomass pretreatment hydrolyzates

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2015)
  • F.K. Kazi et al.

    Techno-economic comparison of process technologies for biochemical ethanol production from corn Stover

    Fuel

    (2010)
  • K.H. Kim et al.

    The effect of low-concentration oxygen in sweep gas during pyrolysis of red oak using a fluidized bed reactor

    Fuel

    (2014)
  • K.T. Klasson et al.

    Bioconversion of synthesis gas into liquid or gaseous fuels

    Enzym. Microb. Technol.

    (1992)
  • J.N.,.H. Abrini et al.

    Clostridium autoethanogenum, sp. nov., an anaerobic bacterium that produces ethanol from carbon monoxide

    Arch. Microbiol.

    (1994)
  • A. Ahmed et al.

    Fermentation of biomass-generated synthesis gas: effects of nitric oxide

    Biotechnol. Bioeng.

    (2007)
  • T.D. Allen et al.

    Alkalibaculum bacchi gen. nov., sp. nov., a CO-oxidizing, ethanol-producing acetogen isolated from livestock-impacted soil

    Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol.

    (2010)
  • H.K. Atiyeh et al.

    Semi-Continuous Syngas Fermentation in a Trickle Bed Reactor. AIChE Annual Meeting

    (2013)
  • S. Austin et al.

    Metabolism of multiple aromatic compounds in corn stover hydrolysate by Rhodopseudomonas palustris

    Environ. Sci. Technol.

    (2015)
  • J.P. Bacik et al.

    Producing glucose-6-phosphate from cellulosic biomass: structural insights into levoglucosan bioconversion

  • A. Banerjee et al.

    Lactose-inducible system for metabolic engineering of Clostridium ljungdahlii

    Appl. Environ. Microbiol.

    (2014)
  • F.R. Bengelsdorf et al.

    Bacterial synthesis gas (syngas) fermentation

    Environ. Technol.

    (2013)
  • O.I. Bernal et al.

    Specific photosynthetic rate enhancement by cyanobacteria coated onto paper enables engineering of highly reactive cellular biocomposite “leaves”

    Biotechnol. Bioeng.

    (2014)
  • V. Berzin et al.

    Cre-lox66/lox71-based elimination of phosphotransacetylase or acetaldehyde dehydrogenase shifted carbon flux in acetogen rendering selective overproduction of ethanol or acetate

    Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.

    (2012)
  • V. Berzin et al.

    Elimination of acetate production to improve ethanol yield during continuous synthesis gas fermentation by engineered biocatalyst Clostridium sp. MTEtOH550

    Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.

    (2012)
  • V. Berzin et al.

    Selective production of acetone during continuous synthesis gas fermentation by engineered biocatalyst Clostridium sp. MAceT113

    Lett. Appl. Microbiol.

    (2012)
  • V. Berzin et al.

    Selective n-butanol production by Clostridium sp. MTButOH1365 during continuous synthesis gas fermentation due to expression of synthetic thiolase, 3-hydroxy butyryl-CoA dehydrogenase, crotonase, butyryl-CoA dehydrogenase, butyraldehyde dehydrogenase, and NAD-dependent butanol dehydrogenase

    Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.

    (2013)
  • D. Bonam et al.

    Regulation of carbon monoxide dehydrogenase and hydrogenase in Rhodospirillum rubrum: effects of CO and oxygen on synthesis and activity

    J. Bacteriol.

    (1989)
  • M. Braun et al.

    Clostridium aceticum (Wieringa), a microorganism producing acetic acid from molecular hydrogen and carbon dioxide

    Arch. Microbiol.

    (1981)
  • M.D. Bredwell et al.

    Reactor design issues for synthesis-gas fermentations

    Biotechnol. Prog.

    (1999)
  • M.D. Bredwell et al.

    Mass-transfer properties of microbubbles. 1. Experimental studies

    Biotechnol. Prog.

    (1998)
  • Cited by (76)

    • Microalgae-based bioremediation of pharmaceuticals wastewater

      2023, The Treatment of Pharmaceutical Wastewater: Innovative Technologies and the Adaptation of Treatment Systems
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text