Elsevier

Biosensors and Bioelectronics

Volume 94, 15 August 2017, Pages 24-29
Biosensors and Bioelectronics

A reaction-based near-infrared fluorescent sensor for Cu2+ detection in aqueous buffer and its application in living cells and tissues imaging

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2017.02.037Get rights and content

Highlights

  • A reaction-based sensor for Cu2+ detection with NIR excitation and emission.

  • The detection limit for Cu2+ is as low as 29 nM in aqueous buffer.

  • The probe shows special selectivity for Cu2+ over other metal ions.

Abstract

Copper (II) is one of the most of important cofactors for numerous enzymes and has captured broad attention due to its role as a neurotransmitters for physiological and pathological functions. In this article, we present a reaction-based fluorescent sensor for Cu2+ detection (NIR-Cu) with near-infrared excitation and emission, including probe design, structure characterization, optical property test and biological imaging application. NIR-Cu is equipped with a functional group, 2-picolinic ester, which hydrolyzes in the presence of Cu2+ with high selectivity over completed cations. With the experimental conditions optimized, NIR-Cu (5 μM) exhibits linear response for Cu2+ range from 0.1 to 5 μM, with a detection limit of 29 nM. NIR-Cu also shows excellent water solubility and are highly responsive, both desirable properties for Cu2+ detection in water samples. In addition, due to its near-infrared excitation and emission properties, NIR-Cu demonstrates outstanding fluorescent imaging in living cells and tissues.

Introduction

Copper is a redox-active metal and an essential trace element for life (Boal and Rosenzweig, 2009, Ridge et al., 2008). It helps to generate red blood cells and maintain the health of immune system, blood vessels, bones and nerves (Davis and O'Halloran, 2008, Dethloff and Bailey, 1998, Giavaresi et al., 2005, Prohaska and Gybina, 2004, Ross et al., 2001, Thiele and Gitlin, 2008). In particular, the potent redox capacity of copper, mainly in Cu2+ and Cu+ forms, is utilized for a wide array of neuronal activities, such as neurotransmission, synaptogenesis, neurogenesis, neurite outgrowth, neurotransmitter biosynthesis, oxidative phosphorylation and oxygen transport (Birkaya and Aletta, 2005, D'Ambrosi and Rossi, 2015, Ishida et al., 2013, Opazo et al., 2014, Peters et al., 2011). In particular, recent studies have shown that abnormal concentration of copper can damage the neuronal system, resulting in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease (Eskici and Axelsen, 2012, Marx, 2003), Parkinson's disease (Davies et al., 2016, Lovati et al., 2009) and Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (Gaggelli et al., 2006, Trumbull and Beckman, 2009). Therefore, chemical tools and approaches that can detect copper activities in living specimens are highly important.

Among various approaches, fluorescence-based methods have shown to be cost-effective, sensitive, and non-invasive to the samples. However, copper responsive fluorescent probes for biological models remains underdeveloped due to significant challenges in overcoming issues of metal special selectivity and specificity for different valences of copper. For example, fluorescent probes for Cu2+ detection has recently been reported with high sensitivity and selectivity (Aron et al., 2015, Carter et al., 2014, Cotruvo et al., 2015, Que et al., 2008). However, the vast majority of reported fluorescent probes for Cu2+ detection display turn-off response (Huang et al., 2009, Jung et al., 2013, Sarkar et al., 2015, Xu et al., 2014), especially for nano-sized fluorescent probes (Chen et al., 2009, Wang et al., 2014, Zong et al., 2011). Despite the fact that several probes have been reported with fluorescence enhancement properties and Cu2+ specificity, they still have major drawbacks: (1) high susceptibility to interfering ions such as Hg2+, Zn2+ and Fe3+ (Ding et al., 2013, Liu et al., 2013, Liu et al., 2012, Liu et al., 2015, Yu et al., 2008); (2) lack of good water solubility, and require organic solvents as test condition (Kowser et al., 2016, Tang and Cai, 2012, Wu et al., 2013); (3) excitation wavelength at ultraviolet light, which at high intensities, may damage biological samples (Cao et al., 2015, Hu et al., 2016, Xu et al., 2010, Yuan et al., 2015). Therefore, developing probes with good water solubility and NIR excitation and emission for Cu2+ detection remains a significant challenge.

To the best of the author's knowledge, only one probe has been reported for Cu2+ detection with near-infrared (NIR) emission (Li et al., 2011). This probe, however, suffers from low sensitivity, showing only a 10-fold fluorescent enhancement. In addition, the working mechanism of the probe is based on chelate coordination between Cu2+, nitrogen and oxygen atoms. One key disadvantage of this design is that Cu2+ is ‘consumed’ by the probe and that, when the concentration of Cu2+ is low, even if the sample is put under a long incubation time, the sensitivity is low.

In this paper, we report a reaction-based NIR excitation and emission probe, NIR-Cu, for Cu2+ detection in aqueous buffers, living cells and tissues. The paper describes the probe design, synthesis, characterization and spectral properties. This reaction-based fluorescent probe displays fluorescence enhancement by reacting with Cu2+ to yield fluorescent products with little affinity to Cu2+, which can avoid the shortcoming of probes with binding and cooperating affection. NIR-Cu has an ester bond between the NIR dye and 2-picolinic acid, and it hydrolyzes in the presence of Cu2+ with high selectivity in the presence of other metal ions. Moreover, detection limit for Cu2+ is as low as 29 nM, which translates to high sensitivity. In addition, excellent water solubility and fast response widen its utilities in biological samples. As a proof of concept, we have develop the ability of NIR-Cu to monitor Cu2+ with confocal fluorescence imaging in tissues as deep as 200 µm, which demonstrates the suitability of the probe in practical applications involving biological specimens.

Section snippets

Apparatus

1H NMR and 13C NMR spectrums were recorded on a Bruker 400 MHz NMR spectrometer. Fluorescence emission spectra were obtained with FluoroMax-4 fluorescence photometer. UV absorption spectra were obtained on Shimadzu 1700 UV/Vis Spectrometer. Mass spectra were obtained using a PC Sciex API 150 EX ESI-MS system. Fluorescence images were acquired with a Leica TCS SPE Confocal Scanning Microscope. pH value was recorded with a FiveEasy TM Fe20 pH meter. Fresh tissue slices were prepared with Leica

Optical properties of NIR-Cu towards Cu2+

In the initial stage of the study, we verified whether NIR-Cu could react with Cu2+. We firstly investigated the optical properties of NIR-Cu (5 µM) in the absence and presence of Cu2+(10 µM). NIR-Cu itself did not display noticeable fluorescence in the PBS buffer (50 mM, pH 7.4). However, after reacting with Cu2+, NIR-Cu displayed strong fluorescence with a 25-fold increase at 700 nm, which is the maximum emission wavelength (Fig. 1). To the naked eye, this red-wavelength shift translated into an

Conclusions

A reaction-based and fluorescent turn-on probe with NIR excitation and emission has been developed for Cu2+ detection in aqueous buffers as well as living cells and tissues. The fluorescence intensity of the probe increases by more than 25-folds upon detection of Cu2+ with a detection limit of 29 nM. The probe displays special selectivity to Cu2+ in aqueous buffer in the presence of a 10-fold concentration of other biologically relative metal ions. As long excitation and emission wavelengths

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by Hong Kong Research Grant Council (No. 21200404, 11302415), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21602033).

References (48)

  • N. D'Ambrosi et al.

    Neurochem. Int.

    (2015)
  • G. Giavaresi et al.

    Biomaterials

    (2005)
  • X.X. Hu et al.

    Sens. Actuators B-Chem.

    (2016)
  • Z. Kowser et al.

    Tetrahedron

    (2016)
  • Z. Li et al.

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2015)
  • J.R. Prohaska et al.

    J. Nutr.

    (2004)
  • L.J. Tang et al.

    Sens. Actuat B-Chem.

    (2012)
  • Y.Q. Wang et al.

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2014)
  • Z.H. Xu et al.

    Sens. Actuators B-Chem.

    (2014)
  • H.T. Zhang et al.

    Chem. Sci.

    (2016)
  • H.T. Zhang et al.

    Talanta

    (2015)
  • A.T. Aron et al.

    Acc. Chem. Res.

    (2015)
  • B. Birkaya et al.

    J. Neurobiol.

    (2005)
  • A.K. Boal et al.

    Chem. Rev.

    (2009)
  • M.J. Cao et al.

    Rsc Adv.

    (2015)
  • K.P. Carter et al.

    Chem. Rev.

    (2014)
  • W.B. Chen et al.

    Chem. Commun.

    (2009)
  • J.A. Cotruvo et al.

    Chem. Soc. Rev.

    (2015)
  • K.M. Davies et al.

    Clin. Sci.

    (2016)
  • A.V. Davis et al.

    Nat. Chem. Biol.

    (2008)
  • G.M. Dethloff et al.

    Environ. Toxicol. Chem.

    (1998)
  • L.P. Ding et al.

    J. Mater. Chem. A

    (2013)
  • G. Eskici et al.

    Biochemistry

    (2012)
  • E. Gaggelli et al.

    Chem. Rev.

    (2006)
  • Cited by (75)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    These authors have the equivalent contribution to this work.

    View full text