Bioelectrochemically assisted osmotic membrane bioreactor with reusable polyelectrolyte draw solutes
Introduction
Osmotic membrane bioreactors (OMBR) have been studied due to their promise as a technology that can produce high quality effluent from wastewater by combining biological treatment and forward osmosis (FO) membrane separation (Wang et al., 2016, Yan et al., 2018). A highly selective FO membrane can effect a net water flow by utilizing the osmotic pressure difference between a low-salinity feed solution and a high-salinity draw solution (Achilli et al., 2009, Cornelissen et al., 2008). Compared to traditional membrane bioreactors (MBRs) that employ a pressure-driven membrane process, the use of FO membranes in OMBRs can decrease energy consumption, alleviate membrane fouling, and achieve high contaminant removal due to a high rejection capacity, retaining persistent trace organic contaminants and facilitating their biodegradation (Alturki et al., 2012, Holloway et al., 2015a, Yap et al., 2012). Therefore, OMBRs have been extensively investigated for application for indirectly and directly reusing potable water, recovering nutrients, and removing heavy metals or trace organic chemicals (Aftab et al., 2017, Blandin et al., 2018, Holloway et al., 2015b, Morrow et al., 2018, Qiu and Ting, 2014).
A key challenge for the operation of an OMBR is solute buildup (i.e., salt accumulation) on the feed side due to rejection of solutes by the FO membrane and the reverse solute flux (RSF) from the draw side (Chekli et al., 2016, Wang et al., 2016). Solute buildup has adverse impacts on both membrane separation and biological treatment, such as decreased water flux, aggravated membrane fouling, deteriorated product water quantity, effects on bacterial community structure and activity, and increased operating costs due to the need for post disposal (Lay et al., 2011, Qiu and Ting, 2013, Song et al., 2018). It has been reported that when the conductivity of the mixed liquor increased from 2.0 to 13.6 mS cm−1, the COD removal efficiency decreased from 90% to approximately 75%, and the specific oxygen utilization rate decreased from 3.42 to 2.34 mgO2/g MLVSS/min, suggesting a reduction in biological activity (Qiu and Ting, 2013). The most common method for controlling salt accumulation is periodic supernatant discharge (Nawaz et al., 2013). An alternative strategy to mitigate salt accumulation is the integration of a side-stream microfiltration (MF) or ultrafiltration (UF) unit into an OMBR, resulting in a hybrid MF/UF-OMBR process (Holloway et al., 2015b, Wang et al., 2014). However, these membrane separation techniques face the problem of additional energy input, and the disposal of the extracted supernatant with a high salt concentration is a challenge. Electrodialysis (ED) has been employed to remove solute buildup, but this process still requires a significant amount of energy input (Lu and He, 2015).
A new strategy for controlling salt accumulation is the incorporation of a bioelectrochemical system (BES) into the feed side to reduce the solute buildup and potentially recover the solute for reuse (Yang et al., 2018). BES uses electrochemically active bacteria on anodes to oxidize organic matter and transfer the generated electrons to a terminal electron acceptor on cathodes (Logan et al., 2006). It has been demonstrated that BESs can be synergistically linked to OMBRs to achieve mutual benefits, such as reducing sludge production, alleviating membrane fouling, and simultaneously recovering energy, water, and nutrients from wastewater (Hou et al., 2017, Liu et al., 2017, Zhang et al., 2017). Increased solute conductivity and buffer capacity greatly enhance current generation in a BES, further promoting salt movement (Hou et al., 2016). Although a proposed bioelectrochemically assisted osmotic membrane bioreactor (BEA-OMBR) system could reduce anolyte conductivity from 24.1 to 9.0 mS cm−1, the residual elevated salinity (i.e., NH4+) from the NH4HCO3 draw solute (DS) can still affect bacterial enzyme activity and respiration rate (Qiu and Ting, 2013, Yang et al., 2018).
The use of a biodegradable DS may help to reduce DS residue. This approach has been investigated using a novel DS, namely, poly (acrylic acid, PAA), that is pH-responsive and can not only produce high osmotic pressures in the form of alkali metal but also reduce RSF due to its high molecular weight (Yang et al., 2017a). In this study, PAA-Na was incorporated into a BEA-OMBR to alleviate the RSF and maintain a healthy environment for the microorganism community. Moreover, the special configuration of the BEA-OMBR exhibited the unique benefit of effectively recovering PAA-Na by means of a pH adjustment recovery process with lower operation costs. Continuous operation of the system will result in the alkalization of the catholyte due to the consumption of protons and accumulation of hydroxyl. Such a high catholyte pH can be used to switch protonated PAA to polyelectrolyte and subsequently reduce resource consumption. The specific objectives of this study were to (1) evaluate the performance of a BEA-OMBR with the PAA DS compared to that of a BEA-OMBR with the NH4HCO3 DS; (2) examine the effects of cathodic or anodic buffer and PAA DS concentrations on BEA-OMBR performance; (3) investigate the biodegradation of PAA on the feed side of BEA-OMBR; and (4) investigate the reuse of the PAA DS in the BEA-OMBR.
Section snippets
System setup
The BEA-OMBR system used in this study consisted of three equal-sized compartments (50 mL/each): cathode, feed/anode side, and draw side. The cathode and feed/anode compartments were physically separated by cation exchange membrane (CEM) (Membrane International Inc., Ringwood, NJ, USA) with a surface area of 0.0026 m2. The anode electrode was a non-wet-proofed carbon brush, and the cathode electrode was wet-proofed carbon cloth (13 cm × 20 cm, Zoltek Corporation, St. Louis, MO, USA) with 4 mg cm
RSF mitigation by PAA-Na DS
To alleviate the RSF, the feasibility of using PAA-Na as a DS in the BEA-OMBR was investigated by comparing a PAA-Na DS to a NH4HCO3 DS under comparable osmotic pressure conditions (1 M NH4HCO3 and 0.48 g mL−1 PAA-Na, with a molarity of 0.24 M). The key performance parameters, including water flux, water recovery, current density, total coulombs (C), TOC removal efficiency, and NH4+ removal efficiency, are shown in Fig. 1. The NH4HCO3 DS had a higher initial water flux (12.2 LMH) than that of
Conclusions
This study has demonstrated the feasibility of using PAA-Na as an effective draw solute for mitigating solute build-up on the feed/anode side of a bioelectrochemically assisted osmotic membrane bioreactor (BEA-OMBR). The resulting low reverse organic flux and biodegradation demonstrate the potential advantages of PAA-Na DS for the enhancement of water recovery and the improvement of treatment performance. However, a dynamic balance was observed between PAA biodegradation and PAA residues on the
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (51908292, 51828801, 51978148), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20190716), National Major Science and Technology Projects of China (2017ZX07202004), Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China (19KJB610003), and startup fund of Nanjing Normal University (184080H202B179). Hai-Liang Song would like to acknowledge the Qing Lan Project of Jiangsu Province.
References (32)
- et al.
The forward osmosis membrane bioreactor: a low fouling alternative to MBR processes
Desalination
(2009) - et al.
Heavy metals removal by osmotic membrane bioreactor (OMBR) and their effect on sludge properties
Desalination
(2017) - et al.
Performance of a novel osmotic membrane bioreactor (OMBR) system: flux stability and removal of trace organics
Bioresour. Technol.
(2012) - et al.
Development of anaerobic migrating blanket reactor (AMBR), a novel anaerobic treatment system
Water Res.
(2001) - et al.
Retrofitting membrane bioreactor (MBR) into osmotic membrane bioreactor (OMBR): a pilot scale study
Chem. Eng. J.
(2018) - et al.
A comprehensive review of hybrid forward osmosis systems: performance, applications and future prospects
J. Membr. Sci.
(2016) - et al.
Membrane fouling and process performance of forward osmosis membranes on activated sludge
J. Membr. Sci.
(2008) - et al.
Exploration of polyelectrolytes as draw solutes in forward osmosis processes
Water Res.
(2012) - et al.
The osmotic membrane bioreactor: a critical review
Environ. Sci. Water Res. Technol.
(2015) - et al.
Long-term pilot scale investigation of novel hybrid ultrafiltration-osmotic membrane bioreactors
Desalination
(2015)
Microbial fuel cells and osmotic membrane bioreactors have mutual benefits for wastewater treatment and energy production
Water Res.
Microbial electrochemical nutrient recovery in anaerobic osmotic membrane bioreactors
Water Res.
Biodegradation of acrylic acid polymers and oligomers by mixed microbial communities in activated sludge
J. Environ. Polym. Degrad.
Study of integration of forward osmosis and biological process: membrane performance under elevated salt environment
Desalination
Integrating microbial fuel cells with anaerobic acidification and forward osmosis membrane for enhancing bio-electricity and water recovery from low-strength wastewater
Water Res.
Microbial fuel cells: methodology and technology
Environ. Sci. Technol.
Cited by (10)
Smart utilisation of reverse solute diffusion in forward osmosis for water treatment: A mini review
2023, Science of the Total EnvironmentProspecting cellulose fibre-reinforced composite membranes for sustainable remediation and mitigation of emerging contaminants
2022, ChemosphereCitation Excerpt :The modification of cellulose acetate (CA) membrane through graft copolymerization, amination and functionalization gives excellent results for HA removal. Membrane separation is divided according to driving forces, such as electrically electrodialysis (Yang et al., 2020), thermal membrane separation (membrane distillation) (Fei et al., 2022), and pressure-based membrane separation (Toran et al., 2020). Depending on the various separation performance, pressure-driven separation is further divided into reverse osmosis (RO), ultrafiltration (UF), nanofiltration (NF), and microfiltration (MF).
The trade-off between nitrogen removal and current generation in an air-cathode bioelectrochemically assisted osmotic membrane bioreactor
2022, DesalinationCitation Excerpt :It was demonstrated that the integrated bioelectrochemically assisted OMBR could improve total nitrogen removal efficiency up to 98.13% [22]. However, the operation cost is increased due to the complex configuration (i.e., three compartments) [23,24] and high energy consumption resulted from an extra aerator for aeration by using oxygen as electron acceptor in the cathode [25]. Notably, the organic carbon source is consumed in both denitrification and electricity production processes, and the mechanism of the carbon source trade-off between the two processes needs to be further investigated.
Minimizing salinity accumulation via regulating draw solute concentration in a bioelectrochemically assisted osmotic membrane bioreactor
2021, ChemosphereCitation Excerpt :Another option investigated is to integrate a bioelectrochemical system (BES) with OMBR to form a bioelectrochemically assisted osmotic membrane bioreactor (BEA-OMBR) to bleed out accumulated salt from the bioreactor (Qin and He, 2017). In this hybrid system, salinity accumulation can be in situ alleviated by the reverse-fluxed solute migration from the bioreactor to cathode side due to the generated current from BES processes (Yang et al., 2020). Compared to a conventional OMBR with the feed conductivity of 24.1 mS cm−1, the BES function in BEA-OMBR can achieve a lower conductivity of 9.0 mS cm−1 in the bioreactor (Yang et al., 2018).
Separation, anti-fouling, and chlorine resistance of the polyamide reverse osmosis membrane: From mechanisms to mitigation strategies
2021, Water ResearchCitation Excerpt :Compared with other physical separation methods, membrane separation has advantages such as easy amplification, relatively low energy consumption, environmental friendliness, simple operation, high separation efficiency, and small floor space and has been widely used in multiple separation fields, including sewage treatment and desalination (Foureaux et al., 2019; Park et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2016). According to the different driving forces, membrane separation can be divided into three categories: electrically driven membrane separation (electrodialysis) (Pan et al., 2018; Yang et al., 2020), thermally driven membrane separation (pervaporation and membrane distillation) (Christie et al., 2020; Liu et al., 2016a; Liu et al., 2020d), and pressure-driven membrane separation (Sauchelli Toran et al. 2020). Pressure-driven membranes can be divided into RO, nanofiltration (NF), ultrafiltration (UF), and microfiltration (MF) according to the difference in separation performance. (
A comprehensive review of nutrient-energy-water-solute recovery by hybrid osmotic membrane bioreactors
2021, Bioresource TechnologyCitation Excerpt :For example, a microbial fuel cell (MFC) can be integrated with an OMBR to mitigate salinity build-up and recover the wasted ammonium in the feed side (Yang et al., 2018). When a polyelectrolyte (i.e., polyacrylic acid, PAA) serves as a DS, the reversed PAA flux is reduced due to its high molecular weight (Yang et al., 2020a). A microbial electrolysis cell-forward osmosis (MEC-FO) coupled system has also been successfully applied for both salinity alleviation and solute recovery (i.e., ammonium), and the ammonium loss (primarily from RSF) is fully compensated for by the reclaimed ammonium to achieve a self-sustained FO process (Qin & He, 2014).