Elsevier

Biomaterials

Volume 31, Issue 23, August 2010, Pages 5916-5926
Biomaterials

The development of electrically conductive polycaprolactone fumarate–polypyrrole composite materials for nerve regeneration

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.012Get rights and content

Abstract

Electrically conductive polymer composites composed of polycaprolactone fumarate and polypyrrole (PCLF–PPy) have been developed for nerve regeneration applications. Here we report the synthesis and characterization of PCLF–PPy and in vitro studies showing PCLF–PPy materials support both PC12 cell and dorsal root ganglia (DRG) neurite extension. PCLF–PPy composite materials were synthesized by polymerizing pyrrole in preformed PCLF scaffolds (Mn 7,000 or 18,000 g mol−1) resulting in interpenetrating networks of PCLF–PPy. Chemical compositions and thermal properties were characterized by ATR-FTIR, XPS, DSC, and TGA. PCLF–PPy materials were synthesized with five different anions (naphthalene-2-sulfonic acid sodium salt (NSA), dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid sodium salt (DBSA), dioctyl sulfosuccinate sodium salt (DOSS), potassium iodide (I), and lysine) to investigate effects on electrical conductivity and to optimize chemical composition for cellular compatibility. PCLF–PPy materials have variable electrical conductivity up to 6 mS cm−1 with bulk compositions ranging from 5 to 13.5 percent polypyrrole. AFM and SEM characterization show microstructures with a root mean squared (RMS) roughness of 1195 nm and nanostructures with RMS roughness of 8 nm. In vitro studies using PC12 cells and DRG show PCLF–PPy materials synthesized with NSA or DBSA support cell attachment, proliferation, neurite extension, and are promising materials for future studies involving electrical stimulation.

Introduction

Traumatic injuries resulting in neurological damage to either the central or peripheral nervous system occur frequently. Spinal cord injuries (SCI) affect over 250,000 individuals in the U.S. with 12,000 new cases occurring every year [1]. Peripheral nerve injuries (PNI) are more common, with estimates as high as 5 percent of all patients admitted to level 1 trauma [2]. The frequency and disability associated with PNI injury necessitates the need for therapies to restore the loss of function. The current clinical standard for the treatment of PNI with segmental nerve loss is the use of nerve autografts, which remove a piece of non-critical nerve from a secondary site on the body to replace the missing nerve section. This technique has significant drawbacks including donor site morbidity, insufficient donor nerve length, mismatch of diameter between donor nerve and recipient site, misaligned endoneurial tubes, and mismatched regenerating axons.

The drawbacks associated with autografts motivate the search for alternate treatment options. Synthetic materials have great potential for applications as nerve guidance conduits because they can be fabricated with various dimensions, degradation rates, chemical compositions, mechanical properties, micro-architectures, and external geometries [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. In addition, therapeutic drugs can be loaded into the scaffolds for controlled release over days or weeks, and cellular therapies, such as stem cells [9], [10], adipose-derived stromal cells [11], or Schwann cells can be cultured on the scaffolds before implantation [12], [13].

Regeneration of damaged nerves faces another obstacle in addition to the above-mentioned challenges. As time passes and nerves extend from the proximal to the distal stump, regenerating axons and the target organs or muscle increasingly lose their regenerative capacity [14], [15], [16]. Therefore, increasing the rate of nerve regeneration through stimulation may be a critical step to realizing full functional recovery after segmental nerve loss. Electrical stimulation as a therapeutic treatment is a rapidly expanding area in the field of tissue engineering, especially for nerve applications, with numerous reports showing electrical stimulation increases neurite and axon extension in vitro and nerve regeneration in vivo. Electrical stimulation by either direct exposure to electrical current (AC or DC) or via an electric field has been shown to effect stem cell differentiation [17], [18], neurite extension [19], [20], and influence directionality of growing axons [21].

Techniques to incorporate electrically conductive materials into biomaterials have included attachment of metal electrodes to proximal and distal nerve stumps [22], [23], scaffolds coated with gold nanoparticles [24], and electrically conductive polymers such as polypyrrole [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36] or polyaniline [37], [38]. Schmidt et al. was one of the first researchers to demonstrate that using the conductive polymer polypyrrole and applying an electrical current through the material has a positive effect on neurite extension from PC12 cells [20]. Since then, numerous groups have thoroughly investigated many aspects of polypyrrole including in vitro and in vivo biocompatibility, stability, conductivity, incorporation of the cell adhesive polypeptide RGD, and more [20], [27], [29], [30], [31], [36]. However, most of this work focuses on thin films of polypyrrole.

Although polypyrrole could be very useful for tissue engineering applications, materials composed solely of polypyrrole are not acceptable as biomaterials. PPy has a very low solubility in most solvents that makes it difficult to process into complex three-dimensional structures, poor mechanical properties that make the materials brittle and weak, and is non-biodegradable. Different approaches have been attempted to overcome these limitations and incorporate electrically conductive polymers into biomaterials. Some examples include blending polypyrrole with poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) [34], [39], [40], [41], [42], block copolymers of polylactide and polyaniline [37], [38], nanoparticles composed of polypyrrole-polyethylene glycol-polylactic acid [35], and the templated synthesis of polypyrrole [26].

Here we report the synthetic method to produce composite materials composed of polycaprolactone fumarate (PCLF) and polypyrrole (PPy). PCLF (chemical structure shown in Fig. 1) is a chemical or photo-cross-linkable derivative of polycaprolactone that can be easily processed into complex three-dimensional structures by injection molding or solid freeform fabrication. PCLF has been shown to exhibit biocompatibility, good mechanical properties, and tunable degradation rates that make it a promising material for application as nerve guidance conduits [8], [43]. PCLF has previously been shown to direct nerve regeneration in the rat sciatic nerve defect model [7] and is currently under in vivo study as nerve guidance conduits in conjunction with therapeutic drugs, Schwann cells, and adipose-derived stem cells. However, a major issue with polymeric nerve conduits in general is that regenerating nerve tissue grows through the polymer as a cable and is surrounded by a thick wall of fibrous tissue that does not make any contact with the polymer walls [7]. This significantly restricts the available space for regenerating tissue. Therefore, the development of materials that promote neural cell attachment and decrease fibrous tissue ingrowth into the scaffold would represent an attractive improvement to these scaffolds.

To increase cellular compatibility and stimulate nerve regeneration, PCLF was extended to the electrically conductive PCLF–PPy composite materials. PCLF–PPy polymer composites can be easily fabricated into complex three-dimensional structures, such as single-lumen and multi-lumen nerve conduits shown in Fig. 1, and overcome the limitations associated with processing polypyrrole into complex three-dimensional structures. PCLF–PPy materials maintained the physical properties of the host polymer PCLF. This alleviates the poor mechanical properties associated with using PPy and incorporates the property of electrical conductivity into the scaffold. Herein we describe the synthesis and characterization of PCLF–PPy electrically conductive composite polymeric materials. We also report the cellular response of PC12 cells and DRG explants when cultured on these materials, and determine the chemical compositions that promote the most favorably cellular responses for future work involving electrical stimulation.

Section snippets

Materials

All chemicals were purchased from Aldrich or Fisher Chemicals and used as received unless noted otherwise. Polycaprolactone fumarate (PCLF) was synthesized by previously reported procedures[8] from PCL diol with a number average molecular weight (Mn) of 2000 g mol−1. The resulting PCLF had a Mn of 7,000 or 18,000 g mol−1 and a polydispersity index (PDI) of 1.96 or 1.82, respectively. Different molecular weight PCLF will be distinguished in this manuscript by the following nomenclature PCLF7000

Results

Electrically conductive PCLF–PPy composite materials were synthesized by polymerizing pyrrole in preformed cross-linked PCLF scaffolds. The resulting interpenetrating networks (IPN) of PPy and PCLF resulted in scaffolds that appeared to be macroscopically homogenous and were colored black characteristic of PPy. Because subtle differences in chemical composition have large impacts on scaffold properties, PPy was synthesized with five different anions to investigate the effect anions have on the

Discussion

Polypyrrole has gained an increasing interest in biomaterials over the last decade because of the positive effect electrical stimulation has been shown to have on tissue regeneration. However polypyrrole has poor mechanical properties resulting in weak and brittle materials and is non-degradable making it unsuitable for applications in peripheral nerve regeneration. Composite materials that incorporate a small amount of polypyrrole with another polymer that has suitable material properties can

Conclusions

Electrically conductive composite materials were synthesized by polymerizing PPy in preformed cross-linked scaffolds of PCLF resulting in interpenetrating networks of PCLF–PPy. This fabrication technique overcomes the challenges associated with using PPy in biomaterial applications such as poor mechanical properties, processing difficulties, and non-biodegradability. PCLF–PPy materials were synthesized with five different anionic dopants to determine the optimal composition for both the

Conflicts of interest

A provisional patent has been filed on polycaprolactone fumarate–polypyrrole based materials, and this technology has been licensed to BonWrx.

Acknowledgements

We thank NIH training grant 1T32AR056950-01, the NIH Loan Repayment Program, and the Armed Forces Institute of Regenerative Medicine by DOD activity contract #W81XWH-08-2-0034 for their generous support. We would also like to acknowledge the University of Iowa Central Microscopy Research Facility for XPS characterization.

References (49)

  • G. Shi et al.

    The regulation of cell functions electrically using biodegradable polypyrrole-polylactide conductors

    Biomaterials

    (2008)
  • L. Huang et al.

    Synthesis and characterization of electroactive and biodegradable ABA block copolymer of polylactide and aniline pentamer

    Biomaterials

    (2007)
  • G. Shi et al.

    A novel electrically conductive and biodegradable composite made of polypyrrole nanoparticles and polylactide

    Biomaterials

    (2004)
  • A. Ackery et al.

    A global perspective on spinal cord injury epidemiology

    J Neurotrauma

    (2004)
  • C.A. Taylor et al.

    The incidence of peripheral nerve injury extremity trauma

    Am J Phys Med Rehabil

    (2008)
  • GCd Ruiter et al.

    Methods for in vitro characterization of multichannel nerve tubes

    J Biomed Mater Res A

    (2007)
  • GCWd Ruiter et al.

    Misdirection of regenerating motor axons after nerve injury and repair in the rat sciatic nerve model

    Exp Neurol

    (2008)
  • GCd Ruiter et al.

    Accuracy of motor axon regeneration across autograft, single-lumen, and multi-channel poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nerve tubes

    Neurosurgery

    (2008)
  • S.W.P. Kemp et al.

    Growth factor and stem cell enhanced conduits in peripheral nerve regeneration and repair

    Neurol Res

    (2008)
  • G.-X. Cui et al.

    Advances in stem cell transplantation for spinal cord injury

    J Clin Rehabil Tiss Eng Res

    (2008)
  • K. Sago et al.

    In vitro differentiation of canine celiac adipose tissue-derived stromal cells into neuronal cells

    J Vet Med Sci

    (2008)
  • H. Arino et al.

    Implantation of Schwann cells in rat tendon autografts as a model for peripheral nerve repair: long-term effects on functional recovery

    Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg

    (2008)
  • Z. Ashley et al.

    Therapeutic stimulation of denervated muscles: the influence of pattern

    Muscle Nerve

    (2008)
  • N.W.S. Kam et al.

    Electrical stimulation of neural stem cells mediated by humanized carbon nanotube composite made with extracellular matrix protein

    Nano Lett

    (2009)
  • Cited by (130)

    • Piezoelectric conduit combined with multi-channel conductive scaffold for peripheral nerve regeneration

      2023, Chemical Engineering Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      PC12 cells have been widely used as a model for neural differentiation [70–72]. Many previous studies have chosen PC12 cells as a model cell to study the effect of material on axon growth [21,22,73–76]. By observing the effect of scaffold on PC12 cells in vitro can help reflect the effect of scaffold on nerve regeneration.

    • Nanogels for drug delivery: physicochemical properties, biological behavior, and in vivo applications

      2022, Nanotechnology and Regenerative Medicine: History, Techniques, Frontiers, and Applications
    • Nanotechnology and 3D/4D Bioprinting for Neural Tissue Regeneration

      2022, 3D Bioprinting and Nanotechnology in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text