TARGET ARTICLEAcceptance and Commitment Therapy and Contextual Behavioral Science: Examining the Progress of a Distinctive Model of Behavioral and Cognitive Therapy
Highlights
► ACT is following a distinct contextual behavioral science (CBS) development strategy. ► The ACT/RFT model, its core features, and relevant research are described. ► The CBS strategy seems to be reasonably progressive. ► ACT should be evaluated, in part, based on its own scientific strategy and goals. ► The field should examine the progressivity of the scientific strategies it uses.
Section snippets
The CBT Tradition and the Origins of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy
Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT, said as one word, not initials; Hayes, Strosahl, & Wilson, 1999) is sometimes placed outside of or opposed to CBT (e.g., Hofmann & Asmundson, 2008), but ACT is part of the larger family of behavioral and cognitive therapies (Forman & Herbert, 2009) and has always been said to be so (e.g., Hayes, Strosahl, et al., 1999, p. 79). ACT is an overarching model of key intervention and change processes, linked to a research program on the nature of language and
ACT: A CBS Approach
CBS is a principle-focused, inductive strategy of psychological system building that emphasizes developing interventions based on theoretical models tightly linked to basic principles that are themselves constantly upgraded and evaluated. The strategy has been abstracted and extended from traditional behavior analysis. Only an outline can be presented here because the issues it raises (e.g., induction vs. deduction, pragmatic vs. correspondence theories of truth, the nature of theory) are
The Scientific Development Strategy of Empirical Clinical Psychology
Empirical clinical psychology needs to attend more to its development strategy. In the usual approach, philosophical assumptions are not explicated, basic processes are all too often an afterthought, and if they exist at all theories are generally narrowly focused, vague, expressed in commonsense terms, and at times wholy untested. The idea seems to be that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) style of medication validation can be used to build a progressive field based on manualized
Conclusion
The scientific progress of empirical clinical psychology seems mixed—no one claims that either paradise or failure has been achieved. Some see the glass as half full and say that the dominant strategy is working; others see it half empty and lobby for strategic change. Frankly, that argument will not be decided by established researchers—it will be decided sociologically by junior researchers, theorists, and students choosing where to invest their life energy.
It seems clear that the field is
References (102)
- et al.
Should the behavioral sciences become more pragmatic? The case for functional contextualism in research on human behavior
Applied and Preventive Psychology: Current Scientific Perspectives
(1996) - et al.
Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire – II: A revised measure of psychological flexibility and acceptance
Behavior Therapy
(2011) - et al.
The effects of acceptance versus control contexts on avoidance of panic-related symptoms
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
(2003) - et al.
A comparison of acceptance- and control-based strategies for coping with food cravings: An analog study
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(2007) - et al.
Acceptance theory-based treatment for smoking cessation: An initial trial of acceptance and commitment therapy
Behavior Therapy
(2004) Falsification and the protective belt surrounding entity postulating theories
Journal of Applied and Preventive Psychology
(2004)- et al.
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: Model, processes and outcomes
Behavior Research and Therapy
(2006) - et al.
Acceptance and mindfulness-based therapy: New wave or old hat?
Clinical Psychology Review
(2008) - et al.
The effects of acceptance versus suppression of emotion on subjective and psychophysiological response to carbon dioxide challenge in patients with panic disorder
Behavior Therapy
(2004) - et al.
A comparison of thought suppression to an acceptance-based technique in the management of personal intrusive thoughts: A controlled evaluation
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(2005)