Elsevier

Animal Behaviour

Volume 84, Issue 2, August 2012, Pages 369-376
Animal Behaviour

Learning individual signatures: rove beetle males discriminate unreceptive females by cuticular hydrocarbon patterns

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.05.003Get rights and content

Pheromones elicit a species-wide, class-specific and stereotyped reaction. By learning class- or individual-specific cues in association with pheromones and subsequently using the cues alone for discrimination, a receiver may react more effectively to its social environment than if its only reaction to pheromones was stereotyped. In the rove beetle Aleochara curtula, recently mated females are inappropriate mating partners; nevertheless they elicit male sexual reactions owing to olfactory excitation by the female sex pheromone. During physical contact, mated females can be discerned by gustatory perception of an antiaphrodisiac pheromone via the clasper-like parameres of the male genitalia. Males transfer the antiaphrodisiac pheromone during copulation, together with the spermatophore, onto their mate. Our experiments showed that in association with antiaphrodisiac pheromone perception, males learned the scent of a mated female and relied on this chemical signature to refrain from sexual grasping responses in subsequent encounters. Habituation–dishabituation experiments further showed that the learned patterns were individual specific. The application of cuticular extracts to alter the scent of females, and the resulting inability of males to discriminate between similar-smelling females, demonstrated that males relied on cuticular hydrocarbons for individual discrimination. Chemical analysis of the cuticular profiles revealed higher variation in female than in male patterns. Learning the scent of mated females in association with the antiaphrodisiac pheromone allows males to reduce the time and energy spent on sexual reactions towards inappropriate mating partners and hence gives them more time to search for a receptive female at the mating site.

Highlights

► Male rove beetles Aleochara curtula learn the individual-specific scent of mated females. ► The scent of females is only learned in association with the antiaphrodisiac pheromone. ► The scent cues are provided by the cuticular hydrocarbons of females. ► Males refrain from sexual grasping response when perceiving the scent of a learned female.

Section snippets

Beetle culture

Aleochara curtula individuals were baited with rabbit carcasses in the surroundings of Freiburg i.Br., Germany and reared in the laboratory according to Fuldner (1968) and Peschke (1986, 1987a). Immediately after emergence, sexes were separated; males were kept in groups of 10 individuals (in plastic boxes 10 × 10 cm and 7 cm high) and females in groups of 30 individuals (in plastic boxes 20 × 10 cm and 7 cm high). All beetles were kept at 22 °C and 65% relative humidity and fed ad libitum with

Sexual attractiveness of females

In a first encounter, nearly all males displayed a grasping response towards the female dummies, irrespective of the female's mating status (Fig. 1). In the subsequent presentations, however, the male's behaviour differed significantly. While virgin females constantly induced male grasping responses throughout the 10 presentations (median: 10), the mated females elicited a sexual reaction increasingly rarely after the initial grasping response (median: 5; Kolmogorov–Smirnov test: D = 0.9, N1 = 10, N

Discussion

The suitability of females as mating partners may vary with their mating status or their recent mating history (Bonduriansky 2001; Thomas 2011). In A. curtula, recently mated females represent inappropriate mating partners for males because the spermatophore, as the primary guarding device, physically blocks the female's genital chamber, and after removal of the spermatophore, females repel male mating attempts by oscillating their abdomen (Peschke 1987b). However, males are sexually attracted

Acknowledgments

We thank Marc Spelleken for assistance with the beetle culture, Josef Müller and two anonymous referees for valuable comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by the Fonds National de la Recherche, Luxembourg (EXT-BFR-04/023 to JS-H).

References (45)

  • J. Andersson et al.

    Anti-aphrodisiacs in pierid butterflies: a theme with variation!

    Journal of Chemical Ecology

    (2003)
  • G.J. Blomquist et al.

    Insect Hydrocarbons

    (2010)
  • R. Bonduriansky

    The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence

    Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society

    (2001)
  • D.A. Dewsbury

    The Coolidge effect in northern grasshopper mice (Onychomys leucogaster)

    The Southwestern Naturalist

    (1981)
  • C. Estrada et al.

    Sexual selection drives the evolution of antiaphrodisiac pheromones in butterflies

    Evolution

    (2011)
  • C. Everaerts et al.

    Drosophila cuticular hydrocarbons revisited: mating status alters cuticular profiles

    PloS One

    (2010)
  • D. Fuldner

    Experimentelle Analyse des Orientierungsverhaltens der Eilarve von Aleochara curtula Goeze (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) am Wirt

    Journal of Comparative Physiology A: Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology

    (1968)
  • C. Gillott

    Male accessory gland secretions: modulators of female reproductive physiology and behavior

    Annual Review of Entomology

    (2003)
  • R.W. Howard et al.

    Ecological, behavioral, and biochemical aspects of insect hydrocarbons

    Annual Review of Entomology

    (2005)
  • J.L. Hurst et al.

    Scent wars: the chemobiology of competitive signalling in mice

    BioEssays: News and Reviews in Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology

    (2004)
  • M. Jacobson

    Insect Sex Pheromones

    (1972)
  • B.G. Johansson et al.

    The role of chemical communication in mate choice

    Biological Reviews

    (2007)
  • Cited by (7)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text