Elsevier

Addictive Behaviors

Volume 33, Issue 11, November 2008, Pages 1454-1462
Addictive Behaviors

Trauma exposure influences cue elicited affective responses among smokers with and without a history of major depression

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2008.04.008Get rights and content

Abstract

The current study tested the emotional reactivity of smokers with and without histories of major depression (MDD Hx) and trauma exposure (TE). Four counterbalanced conditions nested negative (e.g., dysphoric) or neutral mood inductions with in vivo versus control smoking paraphernalia cues (Neutral+Control; Neutral+Cigarette; Neg+Control; Neg+Cigarette). Mixed model analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) tested between and within subjects differences in negative affective symptoms pre- to post-exposure across four groups (TE+MDD Hx; TE only; MDD Hx only; no history). Results produced two notable effects. First, TE only individuals endorsed the greatest increase in depressive symptoms across both negative mood induction conditions (regardless of smoking paraphernalia) compared with other groups. Second, dual history participants (TE+MDD Hx) show a potentiated depressive response to the Neg+Cigarette condition compared with the Neg+Control condition. Implications to a depression-specific negative affective vulnerability among TE only smokers that is independent of MDD Hx and greater than smokers with a MDD Hx are discussed.

Introduction

In most studies (Boscarino et al., 2002, Boyd et al., 1997, Breslau, 2002, Brown et al., 2000, Creamer et al., 2005, Galea et al., 2002, Shalev et al., 1998), but not all (Breslau, Davis, Peterson, & Schultz, 2000), exposure to traumatic life events (TE) has been associated with the development of or the co-occurrence with severe psychopathology, such as Major Depressive Disorder histories (MDD Hx) and/or Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Such TE-related disorders also influence the onset of cigarette smoking behavior (e.g., Koenen et al., 2005, Koenen et al., 2006, Rauch et al., 2006) and are associated with greater smoking prevalence rates (e.g., Acierno et al., 1996, Acierno et al., 2000) compared with the general population (Centers for Disease Control, 2005). Despite this evidence, most research is focused on PTSD-related cigarette smoking (Feldner et al., 2007, Fu et al., 2007) with very little attention placed on other psychological sequelae, such as TE-related MDD Hx. Given that approximately 77% of the TE population does not develop PTSD (Breslau, Davis, Andreski & Peterson, 1991), broadening knowledge of health risk behavior among subgroups of non-PTSD smokers with a TE history (TE only) would provide important information for the study of trauma on smoking behavior.

Research suggests that lifetime violent assault status with a MDD Hx predicts 45% of current smokers compared with TE only (non-PTSD) individuals without a history of MDD (30%) and non-vulnerable individuals (23%; Acierno et al., 1996). TE only and MDD Hx also produce independent additive effects on smoking-related health risks (Benyamini and Solomon, 2005, Kramer et al., 2003, Links and Comstock, 1990, Spertus et al., 2003) and on health care utilization (Adams et al., 2006, Kates and Mach, 2007, Kramer et al., 2003). Little is unknown about biobehavioral mechanisms that may uniquely influence such dually vulnerable (TE + MDD Hx) compared with singularly vulnerable (e.g., MDD Hx without TE or TE only) and non-vulnerable smokers.

One mechanism that may help differentiate dually vulnerable smokers from singularly vulnerable and non-vulnerable smokers is a selective susceptibility to negative affective states (i.e., increased vulnerability to experience negative affective states). Selective emotional responsiveness, particularly among subgroups of depression-prone smokers, may increase a person's drive to smoke to dispel these distressing emotional states (Spring et al., 2007). Most research exploring affective processing among TE only populations have shown that TE only veterans have greater negative affective reactions to trauma-related and non-trauma-related stressor scripts compared with neutral scripts (Beckham et al., 2007). After controlling for nicotine dependence and current MDD, trauma-related scripts compared with neutral scripts also were shown to shorten cigarette smoking puff onset intervals (McClernon et al., 2005). Lastly, TE only and MDD Hx individuals, independently, self-report smoking for negative affect reduction reasons (Beckham et al., 2004, Feldner et al., 2007, Feldner et al., 2007, Haaga et al., 2004, McChargue et al., 2004).

Despite suggestions that individuals with TE only or a MDD Hx may smoke for negative affective reasons (e.g., Feldner et al., 2007, Feldner et al., 2007, McChargue et al., 2004) and that, at least, TE only smokers show the expected negative affect reactivity to trauma-related stressors (e.g., Beckham et al., 2007), laboratory studies have yet to show that smokers with this dual vulnerability are disproportionately prone to negative affect compared with singularly vulnerable (i.e., those with TE only or MDD Hx only) and non-vulnerable smokers. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to address gaps in extant literature by testing for interactive effects of TE only and MDD Hx on affective reactivity among smokers. Our general linear hypothesis is that negative affective elevations resulting from non-trauma-related stressors compared with neutral emotional stimuli would be the greatest in the dually vulnerable group followed, respectively, by the singularly vulnerable and non-vulnerable groups. Given that environmental smoking cues may increase negative affective substrates associated with use (e.g., Doran et al., in press, Drobes et al., 2006), emotional manipulations (stressor vs. neutral) were stratified across in vivo cigarette cue and neutral environmental cue exposure to explore for possible potentiated negative affect reactivity that results from the combination of negative mood induction with the presence of an environmental smoking cue. This was done because, for some, environmental smoking cues appear to be needed to selectively prime internal drives (negative mood) associated with use during stressful situations (Doran et al., in press).

Section snippets

Participants

The current study was a secondary analysis of a larger study featuring smokers with and without a MDD Hx. Given the high comorbidity with this population and those with a history of trauma (Brady et al., 2000, Maes et al., 2000, Pfefferbaum et al., 2002), it was deemed a suitable sample in which to assess the study question after controlling for nicotine and depression-related variables. Participant recruitment was accomplished by distributing flyers and newspaper advertisements in a large

Preliminary analysis

Initially, univariate statistics from individuals who completed the study versus individuals who were originally found eligible before the telephone screening and subsequent screening session were compared. Independent samples t-tests revealed no differences between demographic variables including age, ethnicity, gender (ps > .12) as well as smoking-related variables including FTND and cigarettes smoked per day (ps > .36). Additionally, while no significant differences were found in

Discussion

The overall study results produced expected and unexpected effects. Most notably, individuals with TE only histories showed the greatest elevations in negative mood-induced depressive symptoms compared with all other groups (i.e., non-vulnerable, MDD Hx only, dually vulnerable). This global depression reaction was also independent of cigarette cues. The MDD Hx group had similar global changes in depressive symptoms following both negative mood induction conditions, but to a lesser magnitude.

Acknowledgment

This project was partially supported by NIH (DA00467) and VA Merit Review Entry Program grants to Dr. McChargue.

References (65)

  • CreamerM. et al.

    Psychopathology following trauma: The role of subjective experience

    Journal of Affective Disorders

    (2005)
  • FeldnerM.T. et al.

    Smoking, traumatic event exposure, and post-traumatic stress: A critical review of the empirical literature

    Clinical Psychology Review

    (2007)
  • FeldnerM.T. et al.

    Posttraumatic stress symptoms and smoking to reduce negative affect: An investigation of trauma-exposed daily smokers

    Addictive Behaviors

    (2007)
  • HaagaD.A.F. et al.

    Addictive Behaviors

    (2004)
  • KashdanT.B. et al.

    Anhedonia and emotional numbing in combat veterans with PTSD

    Behavior Research and Therapy

    (2006)
  • LittM.D. et al.

    Reactivity to alcohol cues and induced moods in alcoholics

    Addictive Behaviors

    (1990)
  • McChargueD.E. et al.

    Reinforcement expectations explain the relationship between depressive history and smoking status in college students

    Addictive Behaviors

    (2004)
  • McClernonF.J. et al.

    The effects of trauma recall on smoking topography in posttraumatic stress disorder and non-posttraumatic stress disorder trauma survivors

    Addictive Behaviors

    (2005)
  • RauchS.A.M. et al.

    Posttraumatic stress, depression, and health among older adults in primary care

    American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

    (2006)
  • SegalD.L. et al.

    Reliability of the structured clinical interview for DSM-III-R: An evaluative review

    Comprehensive Psychiatry

    (1994)
  • SpertusI.L. et al.

    Childhood emotional abuse and neglect as predictors of psychological and physical symptoms in women presenting to a primary care practice

    Child Abuse & Neglect

    (2003)
  • StrongD.R. et al.

    Depression proneness in treatment-seeking smokers: A taxometric analysis

    Personality and Individual Differences

    (2004)
  • TiffanyS.T. et al.

    Imagery and smoking urges: The manipulation of affective content

    Addictive Behaviors

    (1990)
  • TiffanyS.T. et al.

    The production of smoking urges through an imagery manipulation: Psychophysiological and verbal manifestations

    Addictive Behaviors

    (1991)
  • AciernoR. et al.

    Assault, PTSD, family substance use, and depression as risk factors for cigarette use in youth: Findings from the national survey of adolescents

    Journal of Traumatic Stress

    (2000)
  • AciernoR. et al.

    Violent assault, posttraumatic stress disorder, and depression: Risk factors for cigarette use among adult women

    Behavior Modification

    (1996)
  • BeckA.T. et al.

    Factor analysis of the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale in a clinical population

    Psychological Assessment

    (1991)
  • BoydC. et al.

    Sexual trauma and depression in African-American women who smoke crack cocaine

    Substance Abuse

    (1997)
  • BradyK.T. et al.

    Comorbidity of psychiatric disorders and posttraumatic stress disorder

    Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

    (2000)
  • BreslauN.

    Epidemiologic studies of trauma, posttraumatic stress disorder, and other psychiatric disorders

    Canadian Journal of Psychiatry

    (2002)
  • BreslauN. et al.

    Traumatic events and postraumatic stress disorder in an urban population of young adults

    Archives of General Psychiatry

    (1991)
  • Centers for Disease Control

    Cigarette smoking among adults—United States, 2004

    Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report

    (2005)
  • View full text