Chapter Five - Quantifying and Identifying the Active and Damaged Subsets of Indigenous Microbial Communities

https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407863-5.00005-8Get rights and content

Abstract

Flow cytometry and fluorescent dyes represent valuable experimental tools for studying complex microbial communities, enabling the quantification and sorting of cells with distinct levels of activity or damage, and providing information that can be difficult to infer from metagenomic sequencing alone. Despite this potential, these single-cell methods have seldom been applied to the study of host-associated microbial communities. Here, we present our recently developed protocols utilizing four distinct fluorescent dyes that label cells based on nucleic acid content, respiratory activity, and membrane damage. These methods have been successfully applied to study the trillions of microorganisms inhabiting the human gastrointestinal tract (the gut microbiota), in addition to a collection of isolates from five common gut-associated bacterial phyla. By merging these protocols with fluorescence-activated cell sorting and downstream multiplex 16S rRNA gene sequencing, it is possible to rapidly assess the taxonomic composition of each physiological category. These methods provide an initial step toward a robust toolkit allowing a rapid, culture-independent, and comprehensive assessment of the physiology and metabolic activity of host-associated microbial communities.

Introduction

The human body is home to trillions of microbial cells representing thousands of species (Turnbaugh et al., 2009, Qin et al., 2010) that have a profound effect on human physiology (Dutton and Turnbaugh, 2012, Haiser and Turnbaugh, 2012). These microorganisms are widely distributed among different body habitats and densely colonize the gastrointestinal tract (referred to as the gut microbiota) (Costello et al., 2009, Maurice and Turnbaugh, 2011). Recent metagenomic surveys have extensively described the structure and dynamics of the gut microbiota and its vast array of genes, the gut microbiome, in states of health and disease (Human Microbiome Project Consortium, 2012, Turnbaugh et al., 2009, Qin et al., 2010, Yatsunenko et al., 2012). However, these techniques provide limited information about metabolic activity, necessitating other methods for the quantification and identification of the active or damaged cells within host-associated microbial communities.

Flow cytometry (FCM) and cell sorting have been used in a variety of ecosystems to access the physiology of cells within complex microbial communities (Del Giorgio and Gasol, 2008, Shapiro, 2000). Combined with appropriate fluorescent dyes, FCM allows the quantification of cells with distinct levels of activity or damage, using the individual cell fluorescence and light scatter signals. In addition, the stained cells of interest can also be sorted and identified by sequencing the appropriate marker genes.

Here, we present an optimized protocol for the single-cell analysis of the human gut microbiota, validated with bacterial isolates and the intact fecal microbiota. First, we provide general information about the use of FCM and the fluorescent dyes available. We then detail our optimized protocols for characterizing the physiology of microbial cells from human fecal samples, as well as methods for the sorting and downstream 16S rRNA gene sequencing, referred to here as FACS-Seq. Finally, we discuss various experimental considerations and troubleshooting options.

Section snippets

Viewing microbial communities with flow cytometry

The main benefits of FCM include speed, hundreds of thousands of events processed allowing for robust statistical analyses, information about general cellular features, and physiological information (for more information, see the excellent review by Shapiro, 1995). Briefly, microbial cells in suspension are exposed to a laser and the resulting light scatter and fluorescence emission signals for each cell are acquired (Shapiro, 1995). Thousands of events per second are recorded and

Sample preparation

Reagents and equipment

  1. Reduced 1 × PBS (rPBS: 80 g l 1 NaCl, 2 g l 1 KCl, 14.4 g l 1 Na2HPO4, 2.4 g l 1 KH2PO4) containing l-cysteine (final concentration 1 mg ml 1) and the oxygen indicator resazurin (final concentration 1 μg ml 1). Filter (0.2 μm) and store anaerobically. Once the rPBS is clear again, it is oxygen free and ready to use.

  2. A monitored anaerobic chamber (e.g., Coy Laboratory).

  3. A tabletop centrifuge, with a swing-bucket or fixed-angle rotor adapted to volumes ≥ 10 ml.

  4. Fresh human fecal samples with limited oxygen exposure.

Optimizing single-cell methods with isolates and fecal samples

For each dye, we used unstained, stained, heat, and/or ethanol-treated samples to determine the optimal dye concentration. Cells were discriminated from noise or unstained cells using 2-parameter scatter plots of light scatter signals (SSC) and the appropriate emission filter channel (FL1 or FL3) (Fig. 5.2A).

We validated our experimental approach with representative strains from the five major phyla found in the human gut: Eggerthella lenta (Actinobacteria), Bacteroides fragilis

Sample handling issues: Storage and oxygen exposure

In order to ensure representative measurements of bacterial physiology, it is essential to minimize sample handling prior to analysis. We tested the effect of sample storage by comparing fresh samples to those maintained at − 80 °C for < 3 months, from the same three unrelated individuals (Fig. 5.2B, left panel). Freezing significantly increased the proportions of all physiological categories (ANOVA, p < 0.0001), and we therefore recommend using fresh fecal samples.

We also tested the effects of both

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (P50 GM068763).

References (31)

  • P.A. Del Giorgio et al.

    Physiological structure and single-cell activity in marine bacterioplankton

  • R.J. Dutton et al.

    Taking a metagenomic view of human nutrition

    Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care

    (2012)
  • H.J. Haiser et al.

    Is it time for a metagenomic basis of therapeutics?

    Science

    (2012)
  • R.P. Haugland

    The handbook: A guide to fluorescent probes and labeling technologies

    (2005)
  • Human Microbiome Project Consortium

    Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome

    Nature

    (2012)
  • Cited by (11)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text