ArticleWomen's experiences with battering: A conceptualization from qualitative research
References (36)
The Commonwealth Fund survey of women's health
(1993)- et al.
Violence in marriage
- et al.
Power and control: tactics of men who batter
(1986) Rape in marriage
(1982)- et al.
A population-based study of injuries in innercity women
Am J Epidemiol
(1991) - et al.
MMPI-2 profiles of battered women in transition
J Pers Assess
(1993) - et al.
Victims of violence and psychiatry illness
Am J Psychiatry
(1984) Mental disorders in battered women: an empirical study
Violence Victims
(1993)- et al.
Posttraumaric stress disorder among battered women: risk and resiliency factors
Violence Victims
(1993) - et al.
Prior physical and sexual abuse in women with chronic headache: clinical correlates
Headache
(1987)
Sexual and physical abuse in women with functional or organic gastrointestinal disorders
Ann Intern Med
Alcohol use in male spouse abusers and their female partners
Fam Violence
Violence during pregnancy and substance abuse
Am J Public Health
Medicine and patriarchal violence: the social construction of a private event
Int J Health Serv
Violence among spouses in the United States 1976–1985
Am J Public Health
Spousal homicide risk and estrangement
Violence Victims
The myth of sexual symmetry in marital violence
Soc Problems
How women experience battering: the process of victim-ization
Soc Problems
Cited by (122)
REPRINT OF: Physical and Mental Health Effects of Intimate Partner Violence for Men and Women
2021, American Journal of Preventive MedicineCitation Excerpt :Screening for IPV victimization among women has been recommended practice for several years now.68–77 Our data support the growing body of research suggesting that we need to extend screening to include physical and sexual abuse,8,25,44,78,79 as well as psychological abuse or battering.44,80–82 The screening recommendations for men victims of IPV are more complicated.
Coercive control in intimate partner violence
2017, Aggression and Violent BehaviorCitation Excerpt :Despite its widespread invocation by IPV researchers and advocates, coercive control has been inconsistently defined and measured. Perhaps similar to the construct of battering (Smith, Tessaro, & Earp, 1996) or intimate terrorism (Johnson, 2010), coercive control has been used to demarcate relationships in which an imbalance of power renders one partner subservient to the other. Such a dynamic has been offered as a counterpoint to what Johnson (1995) has termed “common couple violence,” where physical aggression by both parties does not translate into a pattern of fear, control and loss of autonomy.
Patterns of Intimate Partner Violence and the Harsh Parenting of Children
2023, Journal of Interpersonal ViolenceImpacts of male intimate partner violence on women: A life course perspective
2021, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public HealthExpected years lived with intimate partner violence: a new approach for public health
2021, Global Health Action