Conflict resolution in cooperative design

https://doi.org/10.1016/0954-1810(89)90013-7Get rights and content

Abstract

Complex modern-day artifacts are designed by groups of experts, each with their own areas of expertise. Current approaches to group design are often serial and iterative in nature, which can be time-consuming as well as leading to poor designs that are expensive to realize. New models for cooperative group design, which emphasize the parallel interaction of the design experts involved, are needed. A central issue in cooperative group design concerns how conflicts among different experts can be resolved as the design is being produced. This paper proposes a model for how such conflict resolution can take place, and describes the results of a study aimed at verifying and instantiating this model by examining conflict resolution among human experts in the domain of architectural design. The study yielded four main conclusions: (1) conflict resolution plays a central role in cooperative design, (2) a rich collection of domain-independent conflict resolution expertise can be identified, (3) we need to represent the design rationale to support conflict resolution, and (4) knowledge acquisition in cooperative design presents special challenges and requires special techniques. We include a description of the conflict resolution expertise we uncovered.

References (25)

  • Chandrasekaran et al.

    Deep versus compiled knowledge approaches to diagnostic problem solving

    International Journal of Man-Machine Studies

    (1983)
  • Bezem

    Consistency of rule-based expert systems

  • Brown

    Failure handling in a design expert system

    Computer Aided Design

    (November 1985)
  • Chan, W. T. and Paulson, B. C. Exploratory Design Usirud Constraints. AI EDAM. 1(1),...
  • C.H. Coombs et al.

    The structure of conflict

    (1988)
  • Kleer de

    An assumption-based TMS

    Artificial Intelligence

    (1986)
  • Descotte et al.

    Making compromises among antagonistic constraints in a planner

    Artificial Intelligence

    (1985)
  • J. Doyle et al.

    A selected descriptor-indexed bibliography to the literature on belief revision

    ACM SIGART

    (1980)
  • Duda et al.

    Model design in the prospector consultant system for mineral exploitation

  • D. Feldman

    A taxonomy of intergroup conflict resolution strategies

  • R. Fisher et al.

    Getting to Yes: negotiating agreement without giving in

    (1981)
  • Fox et al.

    ISIS - a knowledge-based system for factory scheduling

    Expert Systems

    (1984)
  • Cited by (69)

    • Integrating viewpoints in the development of mechatronic products

      2014, Mechatronics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Conflict resolution in engineering design is a research subject on its own. Some of the related work in this area is based on design rationale capture [75] and through consensus modeling [76]. However, in this paper we do not explicitly deal with conflict resolution per se.

    • Towards a generic distributed and collaborative digital manufacturing

      2007, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text