Elsevier

Hearing Research

Volume 100, Issues 1–2, October 1996, Pages 192-200
Hearing Research

Research paper
Azimuthal sensitivity of rat pinna reflex: EMG recordings from cervicoauricular muscles

https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-5955(96)00119-0Get rights and content

Abstract

Electromyographic (EMG) responses of the cervicoauricular muscles (CAM) to free-field sounds were recorded in two groups of rats whose brainstems were dissected transversely either at a pretectal or transtectal level. After the rat recovered from anesthesia, wide-band noise pulses were presented and speaker positions were varied systematically in azimuth. Sound levels were set at 10–15 dB above empirically determined threshold for an EMG response to a sound from azimuth. In both animal groups, transient CAM EMGs with short latency were produced and three main types of azimuthal sensitivity of CAM EMG response were observed. (1) For the majority of the cases, an inverted ‘U’ type of azimuthal sensitivity was identified: the maximum activity occurred around 0° azimuth, but as the speaker was moved toward either the ipsilateral or contralateral fields, the sound-evoked activity declined systematically. This directional tuning is quite different from the passive pinna directionality which is very lateral in the resting positions used in this study. (2) In a small number of cases, the spatial sensitivity curves were not symmetrical about the midline (0° azimuth): the EMG response was vigorous in one hemifield and dropped off systematically as the speaker was moved toward extreme positions of the other hemifield. Regardless of shapes of EMG spatial tuning curves, obstruction of either the ipsilateral or contralateral meatus reduced the sound-elicited response dramatically and eliminated the spatial sensitivity. (3) Some cases exhibited an omnidirectional function: the EMG spike rate had no or minor systematical variation as the speaker position was changed in azimuth. The results of this study indicate that with either pretectal or transtectal decerebrate preparations, the acoustically evoked CAM EMG can exhibit an azimuthal sensitivity which is based on binaural processing.

References (65)

  • D.R.F. Irvine et al.

    Responses of neurons in the inferior colliculus of the rat to interaural time and intensity differences in transient stimuli: implications for the latency hypothesis

    Hear. Res.

    (1995)
  • K. Kandler et al.

    Auditory projections from the cochlear nucleus to pontine and mesencephalic reticular nuclei in the rat

    Brain Res.

    (1991)
  • D.S. Leitner et al.

    The neuronal substrate of the startle response

    Physiol. Behav.

    (1980)
  • M.J.D. Miserendino et al.

    NMDA and non-NMDA antagonists infused into the nucleus reticularis pontis caudalis depress the acoustic startle reflex

    Brain Res.

    (1993)
  • W.M. Panneton et al.

    Brainstem projections to the facial nucleus of the opossum: a study using axonal transport techniques

    Brain Res.

    (1983)
  • J. Pellet

    Neural organization in the brainstem circuit mediating the primary acoustic head startle: an electrophysiological study in the rat

    Physiol. Behav.

    (1990)
  • J. Pellet et al.

    Harmaline effects on the sensory-motor reactivity: modification of the acoustic startle pattern

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1983)
  • D.P. Phillips et al.

    Directionality of sound pressure transformation at the cat's pinna

    Hear. Res.

    (1982)
  • P.K.D. Pilz et al.

    Comparative threshold studies of the acoustic pinna, jaw and startle reflex in the rat

    Physiol. Behav.

    (1988)
  • G.D. Pollak

    Time is traded for intensity in the bat's auditory system

    Hear. Res.

    (1988)
  • Y. Takeuchi et al.

    Mesencephalic and pontine afferent fiber system to the facial nucleus in the cat: a study using the horseradish peroxidase and silver impregnation techniques

    Exp. Neurol.

    (1979)
  • M.F. Wu et al.

    Anatomical distribution and response patterns of reticular neurons active in relation to acoustic startle

    Brain Res.

    (1988)
  • J.S. Yeomans et al.

    Doublepulse stimulation of startle-like responses in rats: refractory periods and temporal summation

    Brain Res.

    (1989)
  • L.M. Aitkin et al.

    Responses of single units in cerebellar vermis of the cat to monaural and binaural stimuli

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1975)
  • N.M. Boulis et al.

    Footshock-induced sensitization of electrically elicited startle reflexes

    Behav. Neurosci.

    (1989)
  • J.F. Brugge et al.

    Sensitivity of single neurons in auditory cortex of cat to binaural tonal stimulation: effects of varying interaural time and intensity

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1969)
  • M. Caeser et al.

    Startle responses measured in muscles innervated by facial and trigeminal nerves show common modulation

    Behav. Neurosci.

    (1989)
  • D. Caird et al.

    Process of interaural time and intensity differences in the cat inferior colliculus

    Exp. Brain Res.

    (1987)
  • J.V. Cassella et al.

    Habituation, prepulse inhibition, fear conditioning, and drug modulation of the acoustically elicited pinna reflex in rats

    Behav. Neurosci.

    (1986)
  • Q.C. Chen et al.

    Sound pressure transformation at the pinna of Mus domesticus

    J. Exp. Biol.

    (1995)
  • M. Davis et al.

    Conditioned fear and startle magnitude: effects of different footshock or backshock intensities used in training

    J. Exp. Psychol. (Anim. Behav.)

    (1978)
  • M. Davis et al.

    Plasticity of the acoustic startle response in the acutely decerebrate rat

    J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol.

    (1977)
  • Cited by (22)

    • The medial agranular cortex mediates attentional enhancement of prepulse inhibition of the startle reflex

      2020, Behavioural Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      The startle reflex is a type of systemic and rapid whole-body reflective response in mammals. It can be triggered by a sudden burst of intense sensory stimulus, and serves as an important protective mechanism for survival with a wide range of inter-species commonalities [1–4]. The neural circuitry mediating the startle reflex includes the cochlear nucleus, vestibular, trigeminal nuclei, the caudal pontine reticular nucleus, and the spinal motor neurons [4–7], and is able to summate signals from different sensory modalities.

    • The role of the deeper layers of the superior colliculus in attentional modulations of prepulse inhibition

      2019, Behavioural Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      The startle reflex is a strong whole-body reflexive response that can be effectively elicited by sudden and intense sensory stimuli [1–3].

    • Gap-induced reductions of evoked potentials in the auditory cortex: A possible objective marker for the presence of tinnitus in animals

      2018, Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Despite potential workarounds to avoid possible pitfalls of the test (e.g. Longenecker and Galazyuk, 2012; Lobarinas et al., 2015), a more direct neural marker of tinnitus in animals would be a useful addition to the pre-existing tests. Perhaps more importantly, the reflex-based tests are likely mediated by brainstem circuits which may not directly involve the auditory cortex (Li and Frost, 1996; Gomez-Nieto et al., 2014). If auditory cortex is essential for the perception of tinnitus, behavioural deficits in a reflex-based task which does not require cortical activation may not directly reflect changes in cortical activity relating to the presence of tinnitus (Eggermont, 2013), although it should be noted that at commonly used gap durations (<50 ms) behavioural performance is still subject to descending cortical modulation (Ison et al., 1991; Threlkeld et al., 2008).

    • Perceived location specificity in perceptual separation-induced but not fear conditioning-induced enhancement of prepulse inhibition in rats

      2014, Behavioural Brain Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Since PPI can reduce the behavioral responses to disruptive stimuli by regulating the motor/premotor system, it has been widely used as an operational measure of sensorimotor gating. The primary neural circuitry mediating PPI is located in the brainstem ([6,7], for review see [8]), indicating that PPI is mainly an automatic process at pre-attentive stages. However, PPI can be modulated by attention to the prepulse in both humans and rats [9–20].

    • A novel behavioural approach to detecting tinnitus in the guinea pig

      2013, Journal of Neuroscience Methods
      Citation Excerpt :

      Like the WBS, the auditory-evoked pinna or Preyer reflex is an unconscious response (Bohmer, 1988). The neural circuitry mediating the Preyer reflex has also been defined; the cochlear nucleus (CN), superior olivary complex, and the inferior colliculus (IC) all play a role, as well as regions of the reticular nucleus and facial motor nuclei (Li and Frost, 1996). Furthermore, the variables that can change the reflex are well-understood, e.g., the length of the gap, delay between gap and startle stimulus, or drug intervention (Davis et al., 1993; Leitner et al., 1993; Swerdlow et al., 2001).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text