Review
Sexual competition among females: What causes courtship-role reversal?

https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(91)90089-GGet rights and content

Abstract

In most animals, males are the competitive sex whereas females are typically non-competitive and choosy of mates. In a variety of taxa, certain species (or populations within species) show a reversal in these typical courtship roles. Recent research with these organisms supports a central tenet of sexual selection theory: that it is the relative investment of the sexes in offspring that controls the number of males and females available for mating, and thus is the main determinant of the degree of sexual competition in each sex.

References (49)

  • R.R. Warner

    Trends Ecol. Evol.

    (1988)
  • M.F. Willson

    Trends Ecol. Evol.

    (1990)
  • R.L. Smith

    Anim. Behav.

    (1979)
  • G. Rosenqvist

    Anim. Behav.

    (1990)
  • M.E. Hatziolos et al.

    Anim. Behav.

    (1983)
  • C. Darwin

    Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man

    (1874)
  • G.C. Williams

    Sex and Evolution

    (1975)
  • A. Berglund et al.

    Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.

    (1986)
  • R.L. Trivers
  • G.C. Williams

    Adaptation and Natural Selection

    (1966)
  • G.A. Parker et al.

    Ethology

    (1989)
  • B.S. Low

    Am. Nat.

    (1978)
  • D.T. Gwynne et al.

    Nature

    (1990)
  • S.T. Emlen et al.

    Science

    (1977)
  • W.S. Lawrence

    Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.

    (1986)
  • M.A. Colwell et al.

    Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.

    (1988)
  • R. Thornhill
  • A.J. Bateman

    Heredity

    (1948)
  • M. Petrie
  • N. Burley
  • M. Petrie

    Science

    (1983)
  • L.K. Johnson et al.

    Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.

    (1984)
  • P.L. Schwagmeyer et al.

    Nature

    (1990)
  • Cited by (164)

    • Ecological determinants of sex roles and female sexual selection

      2020, Advances in the Study of Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      Sex role reversal is characterized by choosy males and aggressive, competitive, and polygamous females (Andersson, 1994; Eens & Pinxten, 2000). The primary ecological driver of sex role reversal is a shift in the OSR in favor of females; this happens when males become the reproductively limiting resource, usually as a result of increased male reproductive investment, causing in turn a decrease in male PRR (Eens & Pinxten, 2000; Gwynne, 1991; Parker & Simmons, 1996). Among pipefishes (Syngnathidae), for example, whereas females furnish males with eggs but engage in no further reproductive investment, males brood developing embryos, exchange nutrients with offspring, and experience resource limitations of time and energy (Rosenqvist & Berglund, 2011).

    • Getting ready for mating: The importance of male touching as an accelerator of ovarian growth in a caridean shrimp

      2018, Zoology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In this context, inhibitory interactions may be a way to delay sexual maturity in juveniles and reduce intrasexual competition. However, information on whether juveniles grow up isolated or in contact with adults and on the operational sex ratio of the species in its natural environment would be necessary to confirm this (Gwynne, 1991; Kraus et al., 1999). The stimulatory effect of males and the inhibitory effect of females on ovarian maturation may be potentiated in nature by the nearby presence of other males or females, respectively, due to the gregarious behavior of N. davidi.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text