The evolution of ecodesign
Reference (40)
Fluctuations in innovations over time
Futures
(August 1981)Technological paradigms and technological trajectories
Research Policy
(1982)The role of passenger transport in CO2 reduction strategies
Energy Policy
(March 1991)- et al.
The greening of technological progress: an evolutionary perspective
Futures
(June 1992) Green Design: Design for the Environment
(1991)Industry and the Environment: A Strategic Overview
(1991)- K. Green, A. Irwin and M. McMeekin, Technological trajectories for environmental innovation in UK firms. ‘The Greening...
- et al.
Ecodesign management: a comparative study of companies in Europe and the USA
(Re)designing cleaner products: factors affecting the ecodesign of manufactured products and some implications for the UNEP cleaner production program
(October 1992)Green-ness is good for you
Design
(April 1994)
Changing Course: a Global Business Perspective on Environment and Development
Green Products by Design
The design and commercial success of ‘green’ products in small firms
Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: a cyclical model of technological change
Administrative Science Quarterly
The Evolution of Technology
Patterns of industrial innovation
Technology Review
Robust and lean designs with state of the art automobile and aircraft examples
In search of a useful theory of innovation
Research Policy
Post-innovation Performance: Technological Development and Competition
Innovation: the Attacker's Advantage
Cited by (21)
The environmental impacts of clothing: Evidence from United States and three European countries
2021, Sustainable Production and ConsumptionCitation Excerpt :If the environmental impacts of the use phase are to be mitigated, then consumers must prolong wear time to reduce washing frequency and avoid or reduce dryer usage. At the same time, because many consumers may not be using the newest, most energy-efficient appliances, initiatives to encourage them to update their appliances to efficient models when replacement is necessary (Dietz et al., 2009; Roy, 1994) could also significantly reduce environmental impacts (see our sensitivity analysis in Supplementary Material). Despite its numerous strengths, our study is still subject to certain limitations, which can nonetheless open useful avenues for future research.
“Eco-tool-seeker”A new and unique business guide for choosing ecodesign tools
2017, Journal of Cleaner ProductionCitation Excerpt :Thereupon it is becoming crucial to provide ways and techniques to allow every company to develop new behaviors which are more respectful and less destructive of the environment. One solution is called ecodesign or design for environment, which has been evolving since the 1990s in Europe (Roy, 1994; Van Hemel and Brezet, 1997). Indeed, the idea of thinking about a product and its whole life cycle from design to destruction, focusing on reducing its impacts on the environment, is well accepted and even recognized and prescribed by European regulations (European Communities, 2001).
Eco-design analysis for innovative bio-product from forest biomass assessment
2017, Energy ProcediaEnvironmental responsibility in building design: An Italian regional study
2016, Journal of Cleaner ProductionCitation Excerpt :These aspects are described in detail in Table 1. Several studies have identified a number of factors for the successful integration of Eco-design in product development (Roy, 1994; Handfield et al., 2001; Johansson, 2002; Lindahl, 2003; Boks, 2006) which can be associated to the implementation of Eco-design in the B&C sector. One of most frequently mentioned factor is management commitment and support which refers to aspects such as the establishment of clear environmental goals, not only for organizations, but also for individual product development projects (Ehrenfeld and Lenox, 1997; Ritzén, 2000).
Identifying the underpin of green and low carbon technology innovation research: A literature review from 1994 to 2010
2013, Technological Forecasting and Social ChangeCitation Excerpt :Lande and Leifer [125] stated their opinion from the people concept and thought that the design engineers should have design thinking and engineering thinking under the green environmental movement and the conception of sustainability, their result was based on the case practice among the mechanical students in Stanford University. From another perspective, Roy [126] presented a concept of eco-design evolution and argued that green products would have to evolve from experimental designs into mature products, and outlined some of the factors affecting the rate and extent of eco-design evolution. The design method innovation is also a critical research theme in technology.
U-turn: the rise and demise of the automobile industry
2007, Journal of Cleaner ProductionCitation Excerpt :In terms of environmental efficiency, today's automobile is in its infancy. Although the internal combustion engine is remarkably efficient in terms of its genesis as a technology system [18], gasoline-powered vehicles are extremely inefficient in terms of the extent to which they convert resources into appropriate energy [50,51]. The ‘hypercar’ concept advanced by Lovins requires radical changes not only in the design of cars but also in the overall structure of the industry.