The impact of jitter on separation discrimination: Combination of monocular inputs

doi:10.1016/0042-6989(91)90115-L

Vision Research

Volume 31, Issue 2, 1991, Pages 247-252

https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(91)90115-L Get rights and content

Abstract

The eyes are in continuous motion. A robust system required to make spatial separation judgments should be resistant to the positional noise produced by such movements. Two parallel lines have been jittered horizontally in order to assess the impact of stimulus movement on the retina. Jitter that maintains the separation between the two lines has minimal effect on separation discrimination thresholds, regardless of whether the targets in the two eyes jitter in a positively correlated, negatively correlated or uncorrelated manner. Presenting both eyes with line pairs but only altering the separation in one eye in the second interval yields poorer performance. However, if one eye receives a change in separation while the other views a dark screen then that monocular threshold is very similar to the binocular threshold. These results are most simply explained by procedures which average the monocular separation estimates.

References (23)

BadcockD.R. et al.
Detecting the displacements of spatial beats: A monocular capability
Vision Research
(1987)
BadcockD.R. et al.
The sensitivity of separation discrimination to spatiotemporal jitter
Vision Research
(1990)
FahleM.
Psychophysical measurement of eye drifts and tremor by dichoptic or monocular vernier acuity
Vision Research
(1991)
LeggeG.E.
Binocular contrast summation—II. Quadratic summation
Vision Research
(1984)
LeggeG.E. et al.
Stereopsis and contrast
Vision Research
(1989)
WestheimerG. et al.
Spatial configurations for visual hyperacuity
Vision Research
(1977)
ArditiA.
Binocular vision
BadcockD.R. et al.
Resistance to positional noise in human vision
Nature, London
(1990)
BlakeR. et al.
The psychophysical inquiry into binocular summation
Perception and Psychophysics
(1973)
BlakeR. et al.
Further developments in binocular summation
Perception and Psychophysics
(1981)

DitchburnR.W.

Eye-movements and visual perception

(1973)

Cited by (4)

Modelling the effect of microsaccades on retinal responses to stationary contrast patterns
2007, Vision Research
We have modelled the effect of microsaccades on retinal responses to achromatic borders and lines using physiologically realistic parameters. Typical microsaccade movement sequences were applied to the retinal image of stationary spatial contrast patterns as projected on the foveal cone mosaic after being passed through the optical transfer function of the eye. The resulting temporal contrast modulation over a cone receptive field was convolved with an analytical expression for the response waveform of primate cones (photocurrent: [Schnapf, J. L., Nunn, B. J., Meister, M. & Baylor, D. A. (1990). Visual transduction in cones of the monkey Macaca fascicularis. Journal of Physiology, 427, 681–713]; photovoltage: [Schneeweis, D. M. & Schnapf, J. L. (1999). The photovoltage of macaque cone photoreceptors: Adaptation, noise, and kinetics. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 1203–1216]). The input to the ganglion cell was derived from the cone responses by the difference-of-Gaussians receptive field model of Donner and Hemilä [Donner, K. & Hemilä, S. (1996). Modelling the spatio-temporal modulation response of ganglion cells with difference-of-Gaussians receptive fields: Relation to photoreceptor response kinetics. Visual Neuroscience, 13, 173–186]. The modelled response waveforms suggest that microsaccades may significantly enhance sensitivity to edges, “re-sharpen” the image and, most interestingly, improve resolution of two closely spaced lines. The reason is that fine spatial structure of the retinal image when moving at suitable velocities is translated into a correlated temporal structure of responses of single cones and ganglion cells. The information content of the signal is not strongly dependent on positional accuracy and the effect is thus distinct from the presumed retinal basis of vernier acuity. Other eye movements (drift) with velocity distributions similar to that of the microsaccade’s slow return phase might be similarly useful, although the microsaccade has some distinguishing features that could be functionally significant, e.g., the neural motor control and the biphasic movement pattern.
Vernier in motion: What accounts for the threshold elevation?
1996, Vision Research
Vernier acuity is susceptible to degradation by image motion. The purpose of this study was to determine to what extent vernier thresholds are elevated in the presence of image motion because of reduced stimulus visibility, due to contrast smearing, or to a shift in the spatial scale of analysis. To test the visibility hypothesis, we measured vernier thresholds as a function of stimulus velocity (0–6 deg/sec), for various levels of stimulus visibility, each normalized to the detection threshold at the respective velocity. Contrary to the prediction of the visibility hypothesis, vernier thresholds worsen as the velocity increases, even when the stimuli are equally visible. To test the shift in spatial scale hypothesis, we determined spatial frequency tuning functions for vernier discrimination and line detection tasks, using a masking paradigm. We measured vernier and line detection thresholds as a function of spatial frequency of a sine-wave mask (0.5-32 c/deg), and for stimulus and mask velocities ranging from 0 to 4 deg/sec. Peak masking for both vernier discrimination and line detection, which indicates the most sensitive band of spatial frequencies for each task, shifts systematically toward lower spatial frequencies as the velocity increases. The progressive increase in spatial scale largely accounts for the worsening of vernier thresholds for moving stimuli. Differences between peak masking for vernier discrimination and line detection were found at 0 and 1 deg/sec, suggesting that different mechanisms mediate the two tasks, at least at low velocities. The masking results are consistent with previous findings that directionally selective motion detectors mediate detection of moving stimuli, but suggest that these detectors do not analyze vernier offsets. We conclude that the elevation of vernier threshold for a moving stimulus is accounted for primarily by a shift of sensitivity to mechanisms of lower spatial frequency, and not by decreased stimulus visibility. Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd.
Slow and fast visual motion channels have independent binocular-rivalry stages
2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Perception of a border defined by rapidly reversing luminance contrast
1997, Perceptual and Motor Skills

View full text

The impact of jitter on separation discrimination: Combination of monocular inputs

Abstract

Vision Research

Vision Research

Vision Research

Vision Research

Vision Research

Vision Research

Binocular vision

Resistance to positional noise in human vision

Nature, London

The psychophysical inquiry into binocular summation

Perception and Psychophysics

Further developments in binocular summation

Perception and Psychophysics

Eye-movements and visual perception