Is edge information for stereoacuity spatially channeled?

https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(89)90045-XGet rights and content

Abstract

Models of stereopsis generally assume that binocular correspondence is achieved through alignment of luminance edges in the two eyes. Yet the stimulus properties which constitute edge information for stereopsis have not been defined. Three experiments explored the nature of these stimulus properties. The first two experiments tested whether local luminance gradient and the relative phase of spatial components supply information about the position of edges which influences stereosensitivity. In Expt 1, stereothresholds were reduced with increased spatial frequency or contrast of sinusoidal luminance gratings, but no simple relationship between target luminance gradient and stereosensitivity was found. In Expt 2, stereothresholds were equivalent for targets having identical spatial frequency components, but differing in maximum luminance gradient and the relative spatial phase of their components. In addition, stereothresholds were lower for the target having the higher contrast in pairs of unequal-contrast targets having equal maximum luminance gradients. These results suggest that the properties of luminance gradient and relative spatial phase do not influence stereosensitivity independently of spatial frequency and contrast. Experiment 3 directly tested whether stereosensitivity depends on edge information whose disparity is detected independently at different spatial scales. Stereothresholds for IF + 5F compound targets were found to be equivalent to thresholds obtained separately with the more sensitive of the two components. Taken together with a compressive nonlinearity in the relationship between contrast and stereothreshold obtained by others (Halpern and Blake, 1989; Legge and Gu, 1989) and replicated in Expt 1, the results of Expt 3 indicate that, whatever the exact nature of the luminance discontinuity information utilized in disparity detection, it is processed independently at different spatial scales.

References (39)

  • BishopP.O. et al.

    Binocular interaction fields of single units in the cat striate cortex

    J. Psychol., Lond.

    (1971)
  • BlakemoreC. et al.

    On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images

    J. Psychol., Lond.

    (1969)
  • BlakemoreC. et al.

    Evidence for disparity detecting neurones in the human visual system

    J. Psychol., Lond.

    (1972)
  • FeltonB. et al.

    Disparity processing of spatial frequencies in man

    J. Psychol., Lond.

    (1972)
  • FersterD.

    A comparison of binocular depth mechanisms in areas 17 and 18 of the cat visual cortex

    J. Psychol., Lond.

    (1981)
  • FrisbyJ.P. et al.

    Global processes in stereopsis: some comments on Ramachandran and Nelson (1976)

    Perception

    (1977)
  • FrisbyJ.P. et al.

    Contrast sensitivity function for stereopsis

    Perception

    (1978)
  • FrisbyJ.P. et al.

    Spatial frequency tuned channels: implications for structure and function from psychophysical and computational studies of stereopsis

    Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B

    (1980)
  • HalpernD.L. et al.

    Stereoacuity is a power function of contrast

    Perception

    (1989)
  • Cited by (49)

    • A gain-control disparity energy model for perceived depth from disparity

      2021, Vision Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, it is known that luminance contrast does affect depth perception in various ways. A decrease in luminance contrast increases the apparent distance of a target (Fry, Bridgman, & Ellerbrock, 1949; Rohaly & Wilson, 1999) and reduces the stereo acuity according to a power law function (Halpern & Blake, 1988; Heckmann & Schor, 1989; Legge & Gu, 1989; Cormack, Stevenson, & Schor, 1991). Luminance contrast also affects the peak-to-trough difference in perceived depth.

    • Impact of intraocular scatter on stereopsis

      2018, Vision Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      A number of attempts have been made to investigate the effect of contrast on stereopsis. Heckmann and Schor (Heckmann & Schor, 1989) measured stereo thresholds for sinusoidal luminance gratings with four sets of contrast. They found that stereo thresholds were reduced with increased contrast in the sinusoidal luminance gratings.

    • Research on medical applications of contrast sensitivity function to red–green gratings in 3D space

      2017, Neurocomputing
      Citation Excerpt :

      Besides, human color CSF also achieved great applications in image compression [43,44]. Recently, with the development of 3D technology [45,46], the effect of luminance contrast on stereo acuity has been investigated in a number of researches and indicated that perceivable disparity thresholds decreased with increasing luminance contrast magnitude [47,48]. Similar results were obtained for narrow-band-filtered random-dot stereograms by Cormack et al. [49].

    • Size matters: Perceived depth magnitude varies with stimulus height

      2016, Vision Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      It is well-documented that several aspects of stereoscopic depth perception vary with the scale of the stimulus. Schor and Badcock (1985) and Heckmann and Schor (1989) showed that stereoacuity decreased with decreasing spatial frequency of difference of Gaussians or sinusoidal luminance gratings. Using bars of different widths and the same height, Richards and Kaye (1974) showed that the maximum disparity that resulted in depth perception, and the disparity that produced the greatest depth percept, increased with increasing line width.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    *

    Present address: Human Performance Laboratory, Institute for Space and Terrestrial Science, York University, North York, Ontario, Canada M3J IP3.

    View full text