Elsevier

Physiology & Behavior

Volume 54, Issue 3, September 1993, Pages 415-422
Physiology & Behavior

Article
Effects of caffeine and gender on physiology and performance: Further tests of a biobehavioral model

https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(93)90229-9Get rights and content

Abstract

The present study extended testing of our biobehavioral model describing the effects of arousal and caffeine to include an examination of gender differences and their interactions with habitual and acute caffeine ingestion. Males and females selected as high or low habitual caffeine users were randomly assigned to receive either caffeine or a placebo and exposed to novel and repetitive recall tasks and to simple auditory stimuli. Electrodermal activity and recall task performance were recorded. The four major factors examined, including habitual caffeine use, acute ingestion, gender, and stimulus novelty, affected behavior, physiology, or both. Results showed that habitual caffeine usage systematically affected tonic arousal (skin conductance level) and improved recall task performance. Acute caffeine ingestion increased phasic arousal (skin conductance response amplitude) and reduced habituation rates. Gender interacted with other factors to significantly affect both tonic and phasic arousal, and females performed better than males on the recall tasks. These results were partially supportive of the theoretical model, and further work is needed to examine the interactions of acute and chronic caffeine intake with gender and novelty.

References (51)

  • B.D. Smith et al.

    Regression and criterion measures of habituation: A comparative analysis in extraverts and introverts

    J. Pers. Res.

    (1990)
  • B.D. Smith et al.

    Sensation-seeking: Electrodermal and behavioral effects of stimulus content and intensity

    Int. J. Psychophysiol.

    (1990)
  • B.D. Smith et al.

    Lateralized cortical/cognitive processing and bilateral electrodermal activity: Effects of sensory mode and sex

    Biol. Psychol.

    (1982)
  • B.D. Smith et al.

    Sensation seeking: Differential effects of relevant, novel stimulation on electrodermal activity

    Pers. Indiv. Differ.

    (1986)
  • B.D. Smith et al.

    Dishabituation and spontaneous recovery of the electrodermal orienting response: Effects of extraversion, impulsivity, sociability and caffeine

    J. Res. Pers.

    (1981)
  • B.D. Smith et al.

    Electrodermal activity and extraversion: Caffeine, preparatory signal and stimulus intensity effects

    Pers. Indiv. Differ.

    (1984)
  • T.P. Zahn et al.

    Autonomic nervous system effects of acute doses of caffeine in caffeine users and abstainers

    Int. J. Psychophysiol.

    (1987)
  • R.G. Borland et al.

    Performance in shift workers operating a day-night schedule

    Aviation, Space, Environ. Med.

    (1986)
  • P.A. Bowyer et al.

    Arousal and recognition memory. The effects of impulsivity, caffeine and time on task

    Person. Individ. Diff.

    (1985)
  • G.M. Boyd et al.

    Bilateral asymmetry of skin conductance responses during auditory and visual tasks

    Psychophysiology

    (1983)
  • M. Bruce et al.

    The psychopharmacological and electrophysiological effects of a single dose of caffeine in healthy human subjects

    Br. J. Clin. Pharm.

    (1986)
  • A. Chaponis et al.

    Short-term memory for numbers

    Hum. Factors

    (1990)
  • R.A. Davidson et al.

    Arousal and habituation: Differential effects of caffeine, sensation seeking and task difficulty

    Pers. Indiv. Differ.

    (1990)
  • C. Eisdorfer et al.

    Electrodermal reactivity: An analysis by age and sex

    J. Hum. Stress

    (1980)
  • R.M. Gilbert

    Caffeine consumption

  • Cited by (18)

    • The impact of caffeine use across the lifespan on cognitive performance in elderly women

      2016, Appetite
      Citation Excerpt :

      Previous work has included sample sizes well in excess of 500 participants (Hameleers et al., 2000; Jarvis, 1993; Johnson-Kozlow et al., 2002; Ritchie et al., 2007; van Boxtel et al., 2003; van Gelder et al., 2007). The current sample size was chosen with the anticipation that effects would be robust enough within a sample set particularly susceptible to caffeine, namely women (Johnson-Kozlow et al., 2002; Ritchie et al., 2007; Smith, D., Davidson, & Green, 1993; Stonehouse, Adachi, Walcott, & Jones, 2003). Yet it is possible that the direct effect of caffeine is relatively weak in comparison to other factors and may, in part, explain the variability in findings across studies.

    • Hostility and caffeine: Cardiovascular effects during stress and recovery

      2001, Personality and Individual Differences
      Citation Excerpt :

      Equal numbers of HH and LH subjects were randomly assigned to the caffeine and placebo conditions. Following informed consent, subjects completed screening questionnaires assessing health factors, caffeine sensitivity, and recent drug usage (Smith, Davidson & Green, 1993). Two subjects were dropped, one due to reported lack of sleep, the other due to reported caffeine sensitivity, and randomly replaced.

    • Caffeine and arousal: A biobehavioral theory of physiological, behavioral, and emotional effects

      2020, Caffeine and Behavior: Current Views & Research Trends: Current Views and Research Trends
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text