Rudimentary determinants of attitudes: Classical conditioning is more effective when prior knowledge about the attitude stimulus is low than high

https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(92)90053-MGet rights and content

Abstract

Petty and Cacioppo's (1981, 1986) elaboration likelihood model of persuasion predicts that the classical conditioning of human attitudes is similar to other peripheral attitude change mechanisms in that conditioning should be more powerful when preexposure to and prior knowledge about the conditioned stimulus is low rather than high. To test this hypothesis, neutral words (high prior knowledge) and pronounceable nonwords (low prior knowledge) were matched in terms of subjects' prior attitudes and served as the conditioned stimuli. Forty-three subjects participated in a 2 (Gender: male, female) × 3 (CS-US contingency: word followed by electric shock, nonword followed by electric shock, word and nonword paired randomly with electric shock) × 2 (Experimental Stimulus: word, nonword) mixed-model factorial design. As predicted, the classical conditioning of human attitudes was more effective when nonwords than when words were followed by electric shock. Experiment 2 was a simulation experiment in which 22 students from the same subject pool read descriptions of the experimental conditions used in Experiment 1 and responded to questions about (a) subjects' attitudes toward the stimuli following the various CS-US contingencies, and (b) how the experimenter wanted the subjects to rate the stimuli. Results revealed that subjects expected (and believed the experimenter anticipated) simply that whatever stimulus was associated with shock would also become disliked.

References (82)

  • D. Axsom et al.

    Audience response as a heuristic cue in persuasion

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1987)
  • J.J.B. Ayres et al.

    Systematic manipulation of individual events in a truly random control in rats

    Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology

    (1975)
  • R.S. Baron et al.

    The relation between distraction and persuasion

    Psychological Bulletin

    (1973)
  • L. Berkowitz et al.

    Label-mediated hostility generalization

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1969)
  • S.J. Breckler et al.

    On defining attitude theory: Once more with feeling

  • D. Byrne et al.

    A reinforcement model of evaluative responses

    Personality: An International Journal

    (1970)
  • J.T. Cacioppo et al.

    The need for cognition: Relationships to attitudinal processes

  • J.T. Cacioppo et al.

    Persuasion

  • J.T. Cacioppo et al.

    Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: An individual difference perspective

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1986)
  • J.T. Cacioppo et al.

    The concept of attitudes: A psychophysiological analysis

  • S. Chaiken

    Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1980)
  • S. Chaiken et al.

    Attitudes and attitude change

    Annual Review of Psychology

    (1987)
  • R.B. Cialdini et al.

    Attitude and attitude change

    Annual Review of Psychology

    (1981)
  • J. Cooper et al.

    Attitudes and attitude change

    Annual Review of Psychology

    (1984)
  • M.E. Dawson et al.

    Allocation of cognitive processing capacity during human autonomic classical conditioning

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

    (1982)
  • M. Fishbein

    A theory of reasoned action: Some applications and implications

  • M.S. Gazzaniga

    The social brain: Discovering the networks of the mind

    (1985)
  • I. Gormezano

    Classical conditioning

  • I. Gormezano et al.

    Classical conditioning: Some methodological-conceptual issues

  • G.J. Gorn

    The effects of music in advertising on choice behavior: A classical conditioning approach

    Journal of Marketing

    (1982)
  • C.A. Insko et al.

    The role of assumed reciprocation of sentiment and assumed similarity in the production of attraction and agreement effects in p-o-x triads

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1979)
  • C.A. Insko et al.

    Awareness and the conditioning of attitudes

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1966)
  • D. Katz

    The functional approach to the study of attitudes

    Public Opinion Quarterly

    (1960)
  • C.A. Kiesler et al.

    The distraction hypothesis in attitude change

    Psychological Reports

    (1968)
  • H. Kucera et al.

    Computational analysis of present-day American English

    (1967)
  • W.R. Kunst-Wilson et al.

    Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized

    Science

    (1980)
  • J.E. LeDoux et al.

    Different projections of the central amygdaloid nucleus mediate autonomic and behavioral correlates of conditioned fear

    Journal of Neuroscience

    (1988)
  • J.E. LeDoux et al.

    Indelibility of subcortical emotional memories

    Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

    (1989)
  • R.E. Lubow

    Latent inhibition

    Psychological Bulletin

    (1973)
  • G. Lynch et al.

    Cortical encoding of memory: Hypotheses derived from analysis and simulation of physiological learning rules in anatomical structures

  • M.C. Macklin

    Classical conditioning effects in product/character pairings presented to children

    Advances in Consumer Psychology

    (1985)
  • Cited by (125)

    • Frontal ERP slow waves during memory encoding are associated with affective attitude formation

      2020, International Journal of Psychophysiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Most of our likes and dislikes are derived from experience with the environment, that is, they are learned (Hughes et al., 2016; Rozin and Millman, 1987). Indeed, a substantial body of research has shown that attitudes can be formed through associative learning procedures that consist of stimulus-stimulus or stimulus-response contingencies, such as classical (Cacioppo et al., 1992; De Houwer et al., 2001) or operant (Hildum and Brown, 1956; Insko, 1965) conditioning. The most prominent approach to studying attitude formation, however, is referred to as evaluative conditioning.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This research was supported by National Science Foundation Grants BNS-8706156 and BNS-8818557.

    View full text