A classification of nursing and midwifery shift systems

https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7489(93)90093-AGet rights and content

Abstract

A classification of 122 shift systems worked by nurses and midwives in the larger general hospitals (400 + beds) in England and Wales was made. The systems were classified along two main dimensions: the degree of flexibility for shift rostering (either regular, irregular or flexible); and the speed of rotation between night and day work (either a permanent night shift or systems of fast or slow internal rotation). This resulted in nine possible categories of shift systems. The most common shift system was a flexible day shift with a permanent night shift. Other features of the systems are discussed, e.g. the start times and durations of shifts, and the relative influence of flexible rostering on these features. This classification is a prerequisite for a further research project aimed at identifying those features of shift systems which are likely to cause the least detrimental effects for the individual nurses concerned.

References (27)

  • A. Volger et al.

    Common free time of family members under different shift systems

    Appl. Ergonomics

    (1988)
  • J. Adams et al.

    Coping strategies used by nurses on night duty

    Ergonomics

    (1986)
  • T. Akerstedt

    Psychological and psychophysiological effects of shiftwork

    Scand. J. Work Environ. Health

    (1990)
  • T. Akerstedt et al.

    The circadian variation of experimentally displaced sleep

    Sleep

    (1981)
  • J. Barton et al.

    The response of day and night nurses to their work schedules

    J. Occupational Psychol.

    (1991)
  • J. Barton et al.

    Choice and Control: Implications for Shiftworkers

  • L.L. Beach

    Design and Implementation of a ten-hour work schedule for an ED nursing staff

    J. Emergency Nurs.

    (1986)
  • P. Bohle et al.

    The impact of night work on psychological well-being

    Ergonomics

    (1989)
  • C. Bowers Hutto et al.

    12-Hour shifts: panacea or problem?

    Nurs. Management

    (1989)
  • T.L. Elliot

    Cost analysis of alternative scheduling

    Nurs. Management

    (1989)
  • G. Ernst et al.

    The effects of different sleep patterns on the utility of time under different shift systems

  • S. Folkard

    Circadian performance rhythms: some practical and theoretical implications

    Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B

    (1990)
  • L. Keene

    Working day and night

    New Zealand Nurs. J.

    (1986)
  • Cited by (16)

    • A systematic review of the neurobehavioural and physiological effects of shiftwork systems

      2007, Sleep Medicine Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      One hundred and twelve studies were identified after the initial search as potentially being relevant to this review. Of these, 91 were excluded—32 were reviews,1,4,7–36 33 were cross-sectional studies,6,37–68 eight were before–after studies with considerable methodological shortcomings,69–76 and the remainder had other methodological problems, did not contain information on appropriate outcomes, or were not appropriate for other reasons.77–94 Twenty-one papers were judged to meet the study criteria.

    • Industrial shift systems

      1998, Applied Ergonomics
    • Fatigue management in the hospital

      2018, Fatigue Management: Principles and Practices for Improving Workplace Safety
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text