Main paperProduct evolution during rapid pyrolysis of Green River Formation oil shale
References (41)
- et al.
Fuel
(1986) - et al.
Fuel
(1984) - et al.
Fuel
(1986) - et al.
Fuel
(1982) - et al.
Fuel
(1981) - et al.
Fuel
(1983) - et al.
Fuel
(1983) - et al.
Fuel
(1984) - et al.
Fuel
(1982) - et al.
Fuel
(1985)
Fuel
Fuel
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Report UCRL-52619
Fuel
Am. Chem. Soc. Div. Fuel Chem. Preprints
Am. Chem. Soc. Div. Fuel Chem. Preprints
Am. Chem. Soc. Div. Fuel Chem. Preprints
In Situ
Cited by (21)
Artificial maturation of a Silurian hydrocarbon source rock: Effect of sample grain size and pyrolysis heating rate on oil generation and expulsion efficiency
2024, International Journal of Coal GeologySecondary cracking of volatile and its avoidance in infrared-heating pyrolysis reactor
2018, Carbon Resources ConversionCitation Excerpt :Therefore, the modification of heating method to the cross-direction with the flow of pyrolysis products contributed the suppression of secondary reactions and the yield increase of shale oil. Many literatures have reported that vacuum pyrolysis has a potential to increase shale oil yield due to the quick extraction of the volatile from the materials and the high temperature region of the reactor [27,28]. Therefore, the pyrolysis of oil shale should be conducted under reduced pyrolysis pressure, e.g. 0.6 atm, to investigate the pyrolysis behavior under the conditions with minimized secondary reactions.
Experimental investigation of the role of rock fabric in gas generation and expulsion during thermal maturation: Anhydrous closed-system pyrolysis of a bitumen-rich Eagle Ford Shale
2018, Organic GeochemistryCitation Excerpt :Carbon dioxide is commonly one of the most abundant gases generated from pyrolysis experiments, yet it is generally a trace component in produced natural gas (Andresen et al., 1994; Lewan, 1997; Kotarba et al., 2009; Kotarba and Lewan, 2013). Numerous studies have attempted to explain these observed differences between naturally and experimentally generated gas, and specific factors that have been examined include: open, semi-open, or closed-system pyrolysis techniques (Arneth and Matzigkeit, 1986; Andresen et al., 1993; Dieckmann et al., 2000; Michels et al., 2002), differences in heating procedures (Dieckmann et al., 2004) or confining pressures (Suuberg et al., 1987; Price and Wenger, 1992; Landais et al., 1994; Shuai et al., 2006; Tao et al., 2010), and the presence of various materials including: mineral matrices (Espitalié et al.,1980, 1984; Su et al., 2006; Pan et al., 2009; Holman et al., 2014), transition metals (Mango, 1992, 1996; Mango et al., 1994; Su et al., 2006; Lewan et al., 2008), and water (Hoering, 1984; Stalker et al., 1994; Lewan, 1997; Su et al., 2006; Pan et al., 2009). Another factor that has been shown to influence the products of pyrolysis experiments is the particle size of the rock sample.
Pyrolysis behavior of Indonesia oil sand by TG-FTIR and in a fixed bed reactor
2015, Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis
- ∗
Present address: ICI Polyurethanes, West Deptford, NJ, USA.