Auditory stimulus intensity effects on components of the late positive complexEffet de l'intensité du stimulus auditif sur les composantes du complexe positif tardif☆
References (34)
- et al.
Stimulus novelty, task relevance and the visual evoked potential in man
Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.
(1975) - et al.
Cognitive psychophysiology: the endogenous components of the ERP
- et al.
The effect of repetition of infrequent familiar and unfamiliar visual patterns on components of the event-related brain potential
Biol. Psychol.
(1980) - et al.
Late slow wave components of auditory evoked potentials: thier cognitive significance and interaction
Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.
(1981) - et al.
Cephalic skin potentials in electroencephalography
Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.
(1972) - et al.
The component structure of the human event-related potentials
- et al.
Human auditory evoked potentials. I. Evaluation of components
Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.
(1974) - et al.
Orienting and habituation to auditory stimuli: a study of short-term changes in average evoked response
Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.
(1968) - et al.
Cortical slow negative waves following non-paired stimuli: effects of task factors
Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.
(1978) - et al.
Effects of stimulus intensity on P300
The relationship between autonomic variables and P300 in a habituation paradigm
Emitted P300 and slow wave event-related potentials in guessing and detection tasks
Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.
Slow wave and P300 in signal detection
Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.
On the influence of task relevence and stimulus probability on event-related potential components
Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.
Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man
Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.
Differential contributions of blinks and vertical eye movements as artifacts in EEG recording
Psychophysiology
Prevalence and methods of control of the cephalic skin potential artifact
Psychophysiology
Cited by (78)
Stimulus intensity effects and sequential processing in the passive auditory ERP
2022, International Journal of PsychophysiologyCitation Excerpt :A small SW1 component showed no intensity effects either globally, or in its defining topography. Finally, a SW2 component similar to the Classic SW with frontal negativity and parietal positivity (see Donchin et al., 1975; Friedman et al., 1981; García-Larrea and Cézanne-Bert, 1998; Loveless et al., 1987; Picton and Stuss, 1980; Roth et al., 1978, 1982, 1984; Ruchkin and Sutton, 1983; Ruchkin et al., 1980a, 1980b; Spencer et al., 2001; Squires et al., 1975), and similar to SW2 in Study 1, showed no significant change in its defining topography with stimulus intensity. The most surprising of these results are the near-significant decrease in global P1 and significant decrease in global nP3 with increased stimulus intensity (see corresponding statistics and shading in Table 3), and the lack of significant response increases in N2 (p = .648, two-tailed), P3b (p = .327, one-tailed), SW1 (p = .151, two-tailed), and SW2 (p = .579, two-tailed), contrary to the general expectation of component increase with increased intensity; this will be returned to later.
Event-related potentials associated with auditory attention capture in younger and older adults
2019, Neurobiology of AgingTrials and intensity effects in single-trial ERP components and autonomic responses in a dishabituation paradigm with very long ISIs
2015, International Journal of PsychophysiologyCitation Excerpt :The HabP3 should decrement with trials (Barry et al., 2011; MacDonald and Barry, 2014; Rushby et al., 2005; Rushby and Barry, 2009; but not Barry et al., 2013), show recovery independent of intensity (MacDonald and Barry, 2014; Rushby et al., 2005), and possibly dishabituation (MacDonald and Barry, 2014; Rushby et al., 2005). The SW has been associated with the OR (Loveless and Sandford, 1974), so consequently should demonstrate trial effects (MacDonald and Barry, 2014; Rushby et al., 2005; Zimmer and Demmel, 2000; but not Barry et al., 2011, 2013), but no response recovery is expected at these very long ISIs (MacDonald and Barry, 2014), nor intensity effects (Roth et al., 1982, 1984; Rushby et al., 2005). The present study consolidates and logically extends the investigation of novelty in the OR context by MacDonald and Barry (2014) and Barry et al. (2013) where novelty and intensity were manipulated in a habituation paradigm; as well as addressing the paucity of studies employing ‘genuine’ dishabituation paradigms.
Trial effects in single-trial ERP components and autonomic responses at very long ISIs
2014, International Journal of PsychophysiologyCitation Excerpt :The temporal PCA decomposition in this investigation derived a similar factor with a frontal topography and latency 170 ms; no trial decrement was observed, and that differed significantly from the SCR pattern, suggesting engagement of an early attention-switching process with repeated stimuli. The P2 in early studies was derived as the N1/P2 complex rather than a separate peak, but the use of PCA has isolated the central P2 (Roth et al., 1982). Functionally the P2 has been linked to difficulties in withdrawing attentional resources from a stimulus (Crowley and Colrain, 2004).
N4 component responses to pre-pulse startle stimuli in young adults: Relationship to alcohol dependence
2011, Psychiatry ResearchCitation Excerpt :Startle stimuli not only elicit a behavioral response but also generate a series of electrophysiological responses that can be averaged from the EEG and may be useful in the understanding of the cognitive responses to startle stimuli and its potential relationship to alcohol dependence. A number of studies have described startle ERP paradigms in humans that have been reported to generate N1, P2 and P3 and late wave components using scalp electrodes (see Roth et al., 1982, 1984; Putnam and Roth, 1990; Ford et al., 1999; Ornitz et al., 2001). Most studies have focused on the P300 component of the startle elicited ERP.
Visual verbal working memory processing may be interfered by previously seen faces
2007, International Journal of Psychophysiology
- ☆
This research was supported by the Medical Research Service of the Veterans Administration.
- †
We thank Ray Johnson, Jr., Connie C. Duncan-Johnson, Judith M. Ford and Adolf Pfefferbaum for their suggestions in designing these experiments. Margaret J. Rosenbloom has made helpful comments on a draft of this paper. Karen S. Haney, Andrew F. Kelly and David S. Theis helped in the data analysis.
- 2
Present address: Department of Psychology, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.