Elsevier

Brain Research

Volume 524, Issue 1, 30 July 1990, Pages 85-89
Brain Research

Identification and mapping of a mouse gene influencing cerebellar folial pattern

https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(90)90495-WGet rights and content

Abstract

Little is known about the role of inheritance in the pattern of cerebral cortical folding, or the causes of individual variation. Inouye and Oda (J. Comp. Neurol., 190 (1980) 357–362) found that the cerebellar folial pattern varies markedly between inbred strains of mice and between individuals in a closed (non-inbred) colony, but shows little variation between individuals within a given inbred strain. They concluded that strain-specific variation in cerebellar folial pattern is under genetic control. In the present study, the folial pattern was examined in crosses between the C57BL/6J and DBA/2J inbred strains of mice, which differ in the presence or a single cerebellar fissure, and in recombinant inbred strains derived from a cross between the same strains. We found that variation is discrete, that neither phenotype is dominant, and that the strain difference is due predominantly to allelic differences at a single locus (Cfp-1) on chromosome 4. Incomplete penetrance of the simpler pattern suggests that this genetic locus interacts in a probabilistic manner with epigenetic mechanisms involved in morphogenesis of the cerebellum.

References (32)

  • BaileyD.W.

    Genes that effect the shape of the murine mandible: recombinant-inbred strain analysis

    J. Hered.

    (1986)
  • BaileyD.W.

    Mandibular-morphogenesis gene linked to the H-2 complex in mice

    J. Craniofac. Genet. Dev. Biol.

    (1986)
  • BaileyP. et al.

    The Isocortex of Man

    (1951)
  • BarronD.H.

    An experimental analysis of some factors involved in the development of the fissure pattern of the cerebral cortex

    J. Exp. Zool.

    (1950)
  • BlattC. et al.

    Chromosomal mapping of the mink cell focus-inducing and xenotropic env gene family in the mouse

  • CarpenterM.B. et al.

    Human Neuroanatomy

    (1983)
  • Cited by (28)

    • Spontaneous malformations of the cerebellar vermis: Prevalence, inheritance, and relationship to lobule/fissure organization in the C57BL/6 lineage

      2015, Neuroscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      As shown in Fig. 1C, D, the organization of the cerebellar vermis varies substantially, with some strains having as many as 13 lobules and 11 fissures (Fig. 1A, B). For example, approximately 10% of C57BL/6J mice display the presence of an additional cerebellar fissure known as the ICF Inouye and Oda, 1980) and a genetic locus responsible for this trait has been mapped to chromosome 4 (Neumann et al., 1990; Garretson and Neumann, 1993). In contrast, 100% of DBA/2J inbred mice were previously shown to exhibit an ICF (Neumann et al., 1990).

    • Segmentation of the C57BL/6J mouse cerebellum in magnetic resonance images

      2012, NeuroImage
      Citation Excerpt :

      This review presents the gross anatomy, lobular organization, and histology of the cerebellum, and the authors summarize the distinctive features of the C57BL/6J cerebellum compared to that of other mouse strains. For example, when compared with the DBA/2T mouse, the C57BL/6J lacks an interculminate fissure, which results in incomplete separation of lobules 4 and 5, and, in addition, the boundary between lobules 1 and 2 is difficult to define (Neumann et al., 1990; Neumann et al., 1993). The proposed protocol for the segmentation of the cerebellum aims to support a consistent approach to quantitative studies of regional volumes in the cerebellum.

    • Cerebellum

      2012, The Mouse Nervous System
    • Cerebellum

      2011, The Mouse Nervous System
    • How Many Ways Can Mouse Behavioral Experiments Go Wrong? Confounding Variables in Mouse Models of Neurodegenerative Diseases and How to Control Them

      2010, Advances in the Study of Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      In this way, the genetic regulation of the neural bases of behavior can be examined (Havekes and Abel, 2009; Luo et al., 2008). A number of effects of genetic manipulation have been demonstrated in the brains of mice, including changes in the size and weight of the neocortex (Eleftheriou et al., 1975; Shimada, 1999), the cerebellum (Neumann et al., 1990; Wahlsten et al., 2003a), the hippocampus (Peirce et al., 2003; Thompson et al., 2008; Wahlsten et al., 2003a), the corpus callosum (Kusek et al., 2007; Wahlsten, 1982a; Wahlsten et al., 2003a), and the medial preoptic-anterior hypothalamus (A.E. Brown et al., 1999; Mathieson et al., 2000). There are also genetic influences on neurotransmitter activity (Ebel et al., 1987), the receptors for neurotransmitters (Ng et al., 1994), neurosteroid levels (Tagawa et al., 2006), neuropeptide distribution (Mathieson et al., 2000; Weitemier et al., 2005), and neuroendocrine function (Lee et al., 2007).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text