Frequency and the conference of referential validity

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(77)80012-1Get rights and content

Subjects rated how certain they were that each of 60 statements was true or false. The statements were sampled from areas of knowledge including politics, sports, and the arts, and were plausible but unlikely to be specifically known by most college students. Subjects gave ratings on three successive occasions at 2-week intervals. Embedded in the list were a critical set of statements that were either repeated across the sessions or were not repeated. For both true and false statements, there was a significant increase in the validity judgments for the repeated statements and no change in the validity judgments for the non-repeated statements. Frequency of occurrence is apparently a criterion used to establish the referential validity of plausible statements.

References (15)

  • BransfordJ.D. et al.

    The abstraction of linguistic ideas

    Cognitive Psychology

    (1971)
  • ShapiroB.J.

    The subjective estimate of relative word frequency

    Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior

    (1969)
  • AttneaveF.

    Psychological probability as a function of experienced frequency

    Journal of Experimental Psychology

    (1953)
  • EkstrandB.R. et al.

    A frequency theory of verbal-discrimination learning

    Psychological Review

    (1966)
  • EstesW.K.

    Probability learning

  • EstesW.K.

    The cognitive side of probability learning

    Psychological Review

    (1976)
  • GudeC. et al.

    Frequency judgments for the ‘gist’ of sentences

    American Journal of Psychology

    (1975)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text