Elsevier

Vaccine

Volume 33, Issue 29, 26 June 2015, Pages 3422-3428
Vaccine

Final report on exposure during pregnancy from a pregnancy registry for quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.014Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

To better describe the safety profile of pregnancy exposures to the qHPV vaccine by acquiring and analyzing post-marketing data on pregnancy outcomes.

Methods

This is a voluntary, post-marketing prenatal vaccine exposure registry. Enrollment criteria included an identifiable patient and health care provider from the United States, France, or Canada and exposure within 1 month before the date of onset of the last menstrual period or at any time during pregnancy. Outcomes of interest were pregnancy outcomes and birth defects. Prospectively reported cases were used for rate calculations.

Results

For the 1752 prospective reports with known outcome, 1518 (86.6%) were live births, including ten twin pregnancies. Of 1527 neonates, 1444 (94.6%) had no congenital anomalies. The overall rate of spontaneous abortion was 6.7 per 100 outcomes (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.5–8.2). The prevalence of major birth defects was 2.4 per 100 live-born neonates (95% CI 1.7–3.3). There were 12 fetal deaths (0.8 per 100 outcomes, 95% CI 0.4–1.4).

Conclusion

Rates of spontaneous abortions and major birth defects were not greater than the general population rates. Although no adverse signals have been identified to date, the qHPV vaccine is not recommended for use in pregnant women.

Introduction

Human papillomavirus (HPV) causes premalignant and malignant lesions of the cervix [1], [2], vagina [3], [4], vulva [4], [5], anus [4], [6], penis [7] and oropharynx [8], as well as genital warts [9], [10]. The quadrivalent HPV vaccine (GARDASIL®/SILGARD®, Merck and Co., Inc.) was licensed in the United States in June 2006, and subsequently in many countries around the world.

The quadrivalent HPV vaccine (qHPV vaccine) is not recommended for use in pregnancy. However, as this vaccine is recommended to women of child-bearing age, it is likely that inadvertent exposure during pregnancy could occur in the general population. To collect further data regarding the safety profile of the qHPV vaccine, Merck and Co., Inc. established the “Pregnancy Registry for GARDASIL”, one of the largest registries of its kind. The goal of the registry was to acquire and analyze information on pregnancy outcomes (i.e., live births, abortions, fetal deaths, and congenital anomalies) to better describe the safety profile of pregnancy exposures.

Previous analysis and publication of registry data which covered the first 2 years after U.S. licensure (from June 1, 2006, through May 31, 2008) indicated that the rates of spontaneous abortions and major birth defects for qHPV vaccine-exposed pregnant women were not greater than the unexposed population rates [11]. Here, we provide an update of these data encompassing data from qHPV vaccine approval (June 1, 2006) through December 31, 2012.

Section snippets

Pregnancy registry

The pregnancy registry was a company-run registry whose purpose was to collect data regarding the safety profile of qHPV vaccine in pregnancy. Because the vaccine is not indicated in pregnancy, all pregnancy exposures are either inadvertent or due to off-label use. The registry was, therefore, based on voluntary post-marketing reports. The pregnancy registry was conducted in the United States, Canada, and France. However, regardless of the country of origin, all reports of exposure during

Results

Four thousand nine hundred and nineteen (4919) reports of exposure to qHPV vaccine during pregnancy were recorded from June 1, 2006 through December 31, 2012. One thousand nine hundred and seventy seven (1977) cases were not eligible for enrollment in the pregnancy registry due to failure to meet 1 or more of the enrollment criteria. Overall, 2942 patients with reports of exposure to qHPV vaccine during pregnancy were enrolled in the registry and are included in this analysis (Fig. 1). Of the

Discussion

The pregnancy registry for the qHPV vaccine was established at the time of licensure as part of a multifaceted approach to monitoring exposures to the vaccine during pregnancy. Potential limitations of such pregnancy registries should be recognized. Limitations of registry methodology include that there is no comparator group because the source of cases is spontaneous reporting. Other limitations include underreporting, differential reporting, underascertainment/differential ascertainment of

Acknowledgements

Registry personnel wish to convey their gratitude to the women and health care providers who have reported cases of use during pregnancy and have completed the registry questionnaires. Writing support was provided by Scott C Vuocolo, PhD.

Précis: Data collected in the pregnancy registry for the HPV6/11/16/18 vaccine do not support a relationship between vaccine exposure and adverse pregnancy or fetal outcomes.

Author contributions and disclosures: The authors are responsible for the work

References (29)

  • S.M. Garland et al.

    Natural history of genital warts: analysis of the placebo arm of 2 randomized phase III trials of a quadrivalent human papillomavirus (types 6, 11, 16, and 18) vaccine

    J Infect Dis

    (2009)
  • A. Dana et al.

    Pregnancy outcomes from the pregnancy registry of a human papillomavirus type 6/11/16/18 vaccine

    Obstet Gynecol

    (2009)
  • H.P. Lehman et al.

    A five-year evaluation of reports of overdose with indinavir sulfate

    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf

    (2003)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

    Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program. Surveillance procedure manual and guide to computerized anomaly record

    (1998)
  • Cited by (47)

    • Safety of 9-valent human papillomavirus vaccine administration among pregnant women: Adverse event reports in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2014–2017

      2019, Vaccine
      Citation Excerpt :

      The findings for 9vHPV are in line with prior studies assessing AEs following 4vHPV administration during pregnancy that have not revealed any concerning patterns of pregnancy-specific or infant/neonatal outcomes following vaccine administration [9–13]. An analysis of prospective reports of vaccine exposure during pregnancy from the United States, Canada, and France submitted to the vaccine manufacturer (Merck & Co., Inc.) registry did not find any concerning patterns of spontaneous abortions, fetal deaths, or birth defects following 4vHPV administration [10]. An analysis of data from the Danish Childhood Vaccine Database, Danish National Prescription Registry, and other Danish health and demographic registries did not indicate a statistically significant difference in risk of spontaneous abortion, preterm birth, major birth defects, small size for gestational age, or low birth weight between women who did and did not receive 4vHPV during pregnancy [11].

    • Adverse pregnancy outcomes and infant mortality after quadrivalent HPV vaccination during pregnancy

      2019, Vaccine
      Citation Excerpt :

      In addition, the risk of spontaneous abortion was virtually identical among women vaccinated four weeks before conception and women vaccinated after conception, and there was no apparent effect of the number of vaccine doses administered during pregnancy. Our study is in line with the findings in the two previous studies that investigated risk of spontaneous abortion following vaccination with the quadrivalent HPV vaccine during pregnancy [2,3]. In addition, we analyzed the effect of number of HPV vaccine doses for the risk of spontaneous abortion and thereby add valuable information to the existing knowledge.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Current address: Genentech/Roche, San Francisco, CA, USA.

    View full text