Capacity limits of information processing in the brain

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.04.010Get rights and content

Despite the impressive complexity and processing power of the human brain, it is severely capacity limited. Behavioral research has highlighted three major bottlenecks of information processing that can cripple our ability to consciously perceive, hold in mind, and act upon the visual world, illustrated by the attentional blink (AB), visual short-term memory (VSTM), and psychological refractory period (PRP) phenomena, respectively. A review of the neurobiological literature suggests that the capacity limit of VSTM storage is primarily localized to the posterior parietal and occipital cortex, whereas the AB and PRP are associated with partly overlapping fronto-parietal networks. The convergence of these two networks in the lateral frontal cortex points to this brain region as a putative neural locus of a common processing bottleneck for perception and action.

Section snippets

Capacity limit in explicit visual event detection: the attentional blink

Virtually all models of visual cognition distinguish between capacity–unlimited and capacity-limited stages of information processing (e.g. 3, 4). In these two-stage models, an early stage permits the rapid, initial evaluation of the visual world, whereas later attention-demanding, capacity-limited stages are necessary for the conscious report of the stimuli. The dual nature of visual cognition is well illustrated by the attentional blink (AB) paradigm: when subjects attempt to identify two

The neural basis of the AB bottleneck

Two-stage models of the AB have received considerable support from event-related potential (ERP) studies. T2 target words that are not explicitly perceived in an AB paradigm nonetheless elicit an N400, an electrophysiological marker of semantic processing [15], whereas successful detection of T2 elicits a P300 [9], an electrophysiological marker of working memory updating. Thus, T2 targets that fail to reach working memory are nevertheless processed up to the semantic level.

Functional magnetic

Capacity limits of visual short term memory (VSTM)

Our visual cognition is not only limited by the rate at which information can be attended or consolidated into VSTM, it is also limited by the amount of information that can be stored in VSTM. Although the capacity of VSTM is generally estimated to be about 4 items 28, 29, 30, it is set not only by the number of objects but also by the complexity of each object [31]. This capacity limit has significant behavioral consequences. For instance, VSTM storage capacity is thought to be at least partly

The neural basis of VSTM storage capacity limits

Visual working memory is mediated by a network of brain regions distributed across the cerebral cortex 41, 42, 43. This network can be loosely divided into regions that contribute to Baddeley's [34] central executive system, and regions involved in maintaining the information in working memory (i.e. VSTM). Executive processes, such as encoding, manipulation and retrieval of information from working memory, have been primarily associated with the frontal/prefrontal cortex 44, 45. By contrast,

The limits of response selection: the psychological refractory period

A third major bottleneck of information processing takes place when an appropriate action has to be selected in response to a stimulus. This is evidenced by the psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm [55]: when subjects are required to perform two sensorimotor tasks in rapid succession, the response to the second task is increasingly delayed as the stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between the two tasks decrease (Figure 3a). This occurs even when sensory and motor modalities are distinct

Neural correlates of the psychological refractory period

Electrophysiological studies of the PRP have established the temporal boundary of the PRP bottleneck to a stage between stimulus consolidation in working memory and motor preparation 66, 67, and split-brain patient studies implicate a sub-cortical component to the PRP 68, 69. By contrast, imaging studies have primarily aimed at localizing the cortical substrates of the PRP. Although the neural basis of dual-task interference has received considerable attention over the past 10 years [70], only

Convergence of processing limitations?

This review has so far discussed capacity limits in encoding visual information in working memory (AB), in maintaining and monitoring that information (VSTM and MOT), and in selecting an appropriate response for it (PRP), as if these tapped into strictly independent stages of information processing. Indeed, perceptual and response limitations have traditionally been viewed as such [55]. However, this view has been challenged by findings that the AB and PRP partly share a common capacity-limited

The functional neuroanatomy of processing bottlenecks: a synthesis

Another approach to assessing the relationship between processing bottlenecks is to determine whether they engage similar neural substrates. Although demonstrating that two cognitive processes activate similar brain regions does not necessarily imply that these processes overlap at the cellular level, the failure to find such common foci of activation would rule out the possibility that these processes affect each other through a common neural substrate. Figure 4 shows the brain regions

Conclusion

This review of the literature supports the view that the neural substrates of VSTM storage capacity are primarily localized to posterior cortical regions, and predicts that distinct regions of visual cortex may contribute to separate forms of VSTM storage capacity. By contrast, the AB and PRP bottlenecks are most likely to result from the interaction between foci of a distributed fronto-parietal – and probably visual – cortical network, with individual nodes of the network (e.g. lateral frontal

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from NSF and NIMH to R.M. and from CICN and NSERC (Canada) to J.I.

References (90)

  • E. Awh et al.

    Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory

    Trends Cogn. Sci.

    (2001)
  • D.E. Linden

    Cortical capacity constraints for visual working memory: dissociation of fMRI load effects in a fronto-parietal network

    Neuroimage

    (2003)
  • L. Pessoa

    Neural correlates of visual working memory: fMRI amplitude predicts task performance

    Neuron

    (2002)
  • D. Passingham et al.

    The prefrontal cortex and working memory: physiology and brain imaging

    Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.

    (2004)
  • C.E. Curtis et al.

    Persistent activity in the prefrontal cortex during working memory

    Trends Cogn. Sci.

    (2003)
  • J.C. Culham

    Attention response functions: characterizing brain areas using fMRI activation during parametric variations of attentional load

    Neuron

    (2001)
  • D. Navon et al.

    Queuing or sharing? A critical evaluation of the single-bottleneck notion

    Cogn. Psychol.

    (2002)
  • T. Schubert et al.

    Functional neuroanatomy of interference in overlapping dual tasks: an fMRI study

    Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res.

    (2003)
  • Y. Jiang

    Resolving dual-task interference: an fMRI study

    Neuroimage

    (2004)
  • K.M. Arnell et al.

    Separate and shared sources of dual-task cost in stimulus identification and response selection

    Cogn. Psychol.

    (2002)
  • E. Wojciulik et al.

    The generality of parietal involvement in visual attention

    Neuron

    (1999)
  • J. Von Neumann

    The Computer and The Brain

    (1958)
  • M.M. Chun et al.

    A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation

    J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.

    (1995)
  • J.E. Raymond

    Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink?

    J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.

    (1992)
  • J. Duncan

    Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision

    Nature

    (1994)
  • J. Kawahara

    Task switching mediates the attentional blink even without backward masking

    Percept. Psychophys.

    (2003)
  • P. Jolicoeur

    Modulation of the attentional blink by on-line response selection: evidence from speeded and unspeeded Task-sub-1 decisions

    Mem. Cogn.

    (1998)
  • E.K. Vogel

    Electrophysiological evidence for a postperceptual locus of suppression during the attentional blink

    J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.

    (1998)
  • M.M. Chun et al.

    The attentional blink and task switching within and across modalities

  • J. Duncan

    Restricted attentional capacity within but not between sensory modalities

    Nature

    (1997)
  • S. Soto Faraco et al.

    Modality-specific auditory and visual temporal processing deficits

    Q J Exp Psychol A

    (2002)
  • P. Jolicoeur

    Concurrent response-selection demands modulate the attentional blink

    J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.

    (1999)
  • E. Ruthruff et al.

    Perceptual and central interference in dual-task performance

  • S.J. Luck

    Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink

    Nature

    (1996)
  • S. Dehaene

    Cerebral mechanisms of word masking and unconscious repetition priming

    Nat. Neurosci.

    (2001)
  • D.M. Beck

    Neural correlates of change detection and change blindness

    Nat. Neurosci.

    (2001)
  • M. Husain

    Abnormal temporal dynamics of visual attention in spatial neglect patients

    Nature

    (1997)
  • E.E. Cooper et al.

    Qualitative differences in the representation of spatial relations for different object classes

    J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.

    (2004)
  • J. Gross

    Modulation of long-range neural synchrony reflects temporal limitations of visual attention in humans

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2004)
  • S. Dehaene

    A neuronal network model linking subjective reports and objective physiological data during conscious perception

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2003)
  • N. Cowan

    The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity

    Behav. Brain Sci.

    (2001)
  • S.J. Luck et al.

    The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions

    Nature

    (1997)
  • H. Pashler

    Familiarity and visual change detection

    Percept. Psychophys.

    (1988)
  • G.A. Alvarez et al.

    The capacity of visual short term memory is set both by visual information load and by number of objects

    Psychol. Sci.

    (2004)
  • R.A. Rensink

    Change detection

    Annu. Rev. Psychol.

    (2002)
  • Cited by (637)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text