Impact of land-take on the land resource base for crop production in the European Union
Highlights
► 0.26% of the productive potential of the EU was lost between 2000 and 2006. ► Most of the metropolitan areas of Europe expanded on prime land of their regions. ► Countries with more advanced economies convert cropland at higher speed. ► A negative correlation between GDP growth and cropland conversion was found. ► Per capita annual crop productivity loss is expressed for each member state.
Introduction
Food security in Europe is based on the crop output of its land resources. Land resources also contribute to the supply of biofuels and other raw materials, provide a platform for most human activities and secure a series of environmental services (Blum, 2005, Bouma, 2006). The performance of these land functions—which are often carried out at the same place at the same time—is conditioned by ecological and socio-economic factors. Socio-economic factors influence land availability for food production, land use allocation, and land use efficiency. Ecological factors not only set conditions for the use potential of land, including productivity potential of agricultural areas but also set limits to environmentally acceptable inputs. Optimization of land utilization to secure adequate biomass production for food, feed, and energy in Europe while keeping land provision for other uses and maintaining good environmental status is in the focus of European and national policies (CEC, 2005, CEC, 2006, EC, 2011, Dwyer, 2011). The progress in the understanding of dynamics in multifunctional landscapes (O'Farell and Anderson, 2010) and the existence of operation monitoring systems in many European countries to detect land use change and soil sealing (EC, 2011) provide tools to address the problem of land take for policy planning and implementation.
However, current trends show that the principles laid down in the EU's Thematic Strategy on the Sustainable Use of Natural Resources toward more sustainable production patterns in Europe (CEC, 2005) are far from achieved. On the contrary, the conversion of land resources toward artificial surfaces is ongoing, consistently decreasing the availability of fertile land for future generations (EC, 2011). According to recent studies artificial surfaces have been growing, from the baseline year of 2000 with an average of 3.4% in 36 European countries until 2006 (EEA, 2010). This figure illustrates the significant loss of land potential for biomass production in Europe. In addition to the loss of productive potential, land-take has a series of environmental consequences, ranging from biodiversity decline to reduced potential for carbon sequestration (Prokop et al., 2011). In recognition of the problems created by land conversion, the EU has announced its resource efficiency roadmap (CEC, 2011) setting a target of no net land-take in the European Union by the year 2050. However, the principle of sustainability also implies that low quality land should be subject of conversion to artificial surfaces, while compensating it with land of higher quality. Strategic land use planning and environmental impact assessment often lack elements of soil quality; therefore, the soil quality component is rarely integrated into the policy-making processes either. This is partly due to the data availability on local to national scales (Jones et al., 2005), partly to complexities of soil and land qualities (Blum et al., 2004, Karlen et al., 2001), and partly to lack of expertise in the planning circuits (Tzilivakis et al., 2005). However, there are attempts to provide integrated tools to include land quality in land use planning at local and regional scales (Tóth and Németh, 2011, Vrščaj et al., 2008).
In the current study we aimed to provide new data and knowledge of trends of cropland resource decline caused by land take in a spatially explicit manner in the EU and to quantify the quality (productivity) of croplands lost in the conversion to artificial surfaces. To achieve this aim, we analyzed the extent and productivity of croplands that have been converted to artificial surfaces during the seven year study period. We used the following land take definition of the European Commission (EC, 2011): “Land take is the increase of artificial surfaces (housing areas; green urban areas; industrial, commercial and transport units; road and rail networks; etc.) over time.”
A comprehensive assessment of change in cropland quality (Tóth et al., 2007) was out of the scope of the current research; however, we aimed to provide an overview of changing crop production capacities in the EU member states due to land take. While land take from croplands is the focus of this paper, preliminary analysis on land take from other land cover types is also provided. With additional analysis of population and economic data the dependency and characteristics of land take on underlying socioeconomic factors were also assessed.
Section snippets
The SoilProd data
The spatially explicit Soil Productivity Model for Europe (SoilProd; Tóth et al., 2011), developed at the European Commission's Joint Research Centre, Ispra, was used in the current study. The SoilProd model is developed to support planning and monitoring of resource use efficiency and sustainability of agricultural land use. According to the underlying principle of the SoilProd model, biomass production of a given soil depends on geographical location (climatic-, hydrological- and terrain
Land take trends in the EU between 2000 and 2006
The European Union, based on the analysis of 24 member states, lost 0.27% of its cropland due to conversion to artificial surfaces in the period between 2000 and 2006. The rate of land take was highest in croplands followed by grasslands, plantations, and forests, respectively (Table 3). This sequence of land take rates suggests that land conversion to artificial surfaces follows the historic trends also in the 21st century with continuing conversion of more productive land. The historic trend
Conclusions
The loss of agricultural land due to conversion to artificial surfaces is a common problem in the European Union, of which all regions are affected to a greater or lesser extent. Simultaneously, there are also considerable differences in EU member states both in the speed of land-take and in the quality of the land taken out from crop production in favor of artificial surfaces.
Spatial analyses of the land productivity and land use data show that the EU is experiencing a consistent decrease in
Acknowledgments
The author sincerely thanks Katalin Bódis and Éva Ivits for the support they provided in the GIS application of the SoilProd model during this study. Comments and suggestions from anonymous reviewers provided very valuable input to improve the quality of the paper. Special thanks are due to Martha Dunbar and András Vincze who revised and corrected the text of the manuscript from a linguistic point of view.
References (38)
- et al.
Research needs in support of the European thematic strategy for soil protection
Trends Anal Chem
(2004) UK Land use futures: policy influence and challenges for the coming decades
Land Use Policy
(2011)- et al.
Soil quality: current concepts and applications
- et al.
Does demographic change affect land use patterns? A case study from Germany
Land Use Policy
(2010) - et al.
The shuttle radar topography mission—a new class of digital elevation models acquired by spaceborne radar
Photogramm Remote Sens
(2003) - et al.
A prototype framework for assessing risks to soil functions
Environ Impact Assess Rev
(2005) - et al.
A method for soil environmental quality evaluation for management and planning in urban areas
Landscape Urban Plann
(2008) Functions of soil for society and the environment
Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol
(2005)Soil functions and land use
- et al.
Geographically weighted regression: a method for exploring spatial nonstationarity
Geogr Anal
(1996)
Thematic strategy on the sustainable use of natural resources
Thematic strategy for soil protection
Roadmap to a resource efficient Europe
CORINE Land Cover; technical guide
CORINE Land cover dataset for 1990–2000–2006
European Soil Database (distribution version v2.0)
Report on best practices for limiting soil sealing and mitigating its effects
The European environment. State and outlook 2010. Land Use
Land take assessment
Cited by (42)
Barn or building lot? A cross-case comparison viewing the role of agricultural interests in Austria's local spatial planning processes
2022, Land Use PolicyCitation Excerpt :The second distinguishing feature and selection criterion was the change in the share of farmland between 2007 and 2017 in each municipality, calculated based on the regional information from the land-register database by the Federal Office of Metrology and Surveying (BEV) (BEV, 2018, 2008). This database allows exact comparisons only to a limited extent due to irregular land use data updates and a category adaptation by the BEV in 2012 (ÖROK, 2015b; Umweltbundesamt, 2016). Given the lack of alternative data sources, it was nonetheless used for the selection.
Agricultural landscape change impact on the quality of land: An African continent-wide assessment in gained and displaced agricultural lands
2022, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and GeoinformationMapping settlement systems in China and their change trajectories between 1990 and 2010
2019, Habitat InternationalCitation Excerpt :As these developments often come at a cost of agricultural lands, it further contributes to competition for land, thus affecting food security and biodiversity habitat (van Vliet, Eitelberg, & Verburg, 2017). This problem is not unique to China, as similar challenges have been observed elsewhere (Tóth, 2012; van Vliet, 2019). There is a window of opportunity for land use planning and national policies to reduce such conflicts by restricting built-up expansion and fostering more compact settlement types.