Habitat fragmentation effects on fitness of plant populations – a review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2003.07.002Get rights and content

Abstract

Habitat fragmentation threatens the survival of many species and local populations. Habitat fragmentation has two major consequences: populations become more isolated and are reduced in size. Small compared with large populations have increased extinction risks because of different types stochasticity (e.g. genetic drift) and inbreeding, which can negatively affect the fitness of individuals or populations. Habitat fragmentation may also change the abiotic conditions of the surrounding landscape, which influences biotic interactions. This review gives an introduction to the theory of the effects of habitat fragmentation on mean fitness of plant populations. It intends to help bridge the gap between conservation biologists and conservation practitioners. The paper shortly introduces basic concepts of population biology, demography and genetics and cites relevant and new literature. Special attention is given to more common plant species, which have attracted far less conservation attention than rare species.

Section snippets

Habitat fragmentation

Human activities have changed between one-third and one-half of the earth's land surface and are leading to substantial and growing modification of the earth's biological resources (Vitousek, Mooney, Lubchenco, & Melillo, 1997). Among others, habitat destruction and habitat fragmentation are ongoing major anthropogenic impacts on landscapes, which can strongly affect ecosystems, populations and species (Young, Boyle, & Brown, 1996; Young & Clarke, 2000). Plants and animals may live in naturally

What is a metapopulation?

Scattered populations of a species in a landscape, which are in contact via migration and which are characterised by local population extinction and by colonisation of unoccupied sites constitute a metapopulation (Levins, 1969; Hanski & Gilpin (1991), Hanski & Gilpin (1997)). Especially in the light of habitat fragmentation, the metapopulation concept has received increasing interest, and it has been widely discussed and expanded (e.g. Gotelli, 1991; Hanski & Gilpin (1991), Hanski & Gilpin

Natural catastrophes and environmental stochasticity

Habitat fragmentation creates small and/or isolated populations. Such populations have increased extinction risks by pure chance, compared with larger populations. Four types of stochasticity affecting populations are recognised: natural catastrophes, environmental stochasticity, demographic stochasticity and genetic drift (Shaffer, 1987). Natural catastrophes such as floods, fires or droughts can, of course, also drive large populations or even species to extinction in short time. However,

Genetic mechanisms and inbreeding depression

The term ‘inbreeding’ is used to describe various related phenomena; all of them refer to matings among relatives, which increases homozygosity, and all of them are relative measures (see Keller & Waller, 2002). (a) ‘Pedigree inbreeding’ means that an individual is inbred if parents share ancestors; or in other words that two genes in different individuals are derived from the same gene in a common ancestor. (b) Inbreeding can be a result of non-random mating, meaning that the parents of an

Mutations and purging

Mutations occur randomly in any individual. Often mutations have no consequences, because they occur in unimportant regions in the genome (e.g. in spacer regions, which are not translated into proteins and are not expressed). If mutations do have consequences, they are mostly negative and can be mildly deleterious to lethal. But mutations are also the source of genetic variation, and theoretically balance the loss of genetic variability through genetic drift (Lande, 1995). Moreover, mutations

Number of migrants

The negative effects of small population size on genetic mechanisms described above (i.e. the effects of genetic drift on neutral and non-neutral genetic diversity) can be alleviated if the populations are not completely isolated and receive additional ‘genetic material’ from other populations. This is called gene flow (Levin & Kerster, 1974; Slatkin, 1985; Levin, 1988; Ellstrand (1992a), Ellstrand (1992b); Ellstrand & Elam, 1993). The importance and magnitude of gene flow has been widely

Plant–pollinator interactions

Apart from the genetic effects described above, different reactions of pollinators in small compared with large populations may also reduce population viability. In small plant patches and in patches with reduced plant densities, pollinator diversity is often reduced (Rathcke & Jules, 1993). Often, pollinators are only attracted to large patches of the one same species or to large patches with many different flowers growing on them (facilitation effect; Sih & Baltus, 1987; Olesen & Jain, 1994).

Rare plants

Through habitat fragmentation, plants (and animals) can be forced to live in small populations. This may make them rarer than they were before and can eventually lead to local population or even species extinction (Young et al., 1996; Young & Clarke, 2000). On the other hand, many plant species have evolved over long time ranges in naturally small, isolated populations and are well adapted to surviving under these special conditions. Several types of rarity are acknowledged in plant ecology:

Altered landscape structure and edge effects

Habitat fragmentation may not only have a direct impact on populations, by dividing and isolating them, but it can also change abiotic conditions of the surrounding landscape and of the habitat itself (Saunders et al., 1991). This will inevitably influence biotic interactions in the habitat remnant. For instance, if a certain habitat was formerly surrounded by woodland, wind flux across the landscape may be altered after destruction of the woodland. Such an effect was found in the maple Acer

Minimum viable population sizes

For practicing conservation managers in particular, an important question arising from the above-described negative effects of small population size is how large a viable population would have to be. Much scientific effort has been placed into determining minimum viable population sizes (MVP). Widely accepted mathematical models showed that populations with less than 100–500 reproductive individuals will not be able to survive in medium time ranges (say around 100 years), because of chance

Artificial gene flow and outbreeding depression

Since gene flow can alleviate the problems associated with isolation of small populations, it has been suggested to use artificial gene flow as a conservation measure. For instance, seeds from one large and vigorous population could be brought to a small and endangered population, hereby increasing its genetic diversity. However, gene flow is not necessarily only beneficial. Gene flow can also reduce fitness, because sessile plants with restricted dispersal capacities may be highly adapted to

Summary and conclusions

Habitat fragmentation threatens the survival of many species and can cause the extinction of local populations (Ehrlich & Wilson, 1991; Young et al., 1996; Young & Clarke, 2000). Habitat fragmentation has two major consequences: populations become more isolated and are reduced in size. Small compared with large populations have increased extinction risks because of natural catastrophes and environmental, demographic or genetic stochasticity (drift). Genetic drift reduces the genetic variability

Acknowledgements

The author thanks Elena Conti, Matthias Diemer, Markus Fischer, Bernhard Schmid, Jakob Schneller and especially Isabelle Olivieri for critically reading earlier versions of the manuscript, for helpful comments and for their encouragement.

References (169)

  • J. Ågren et al.

    Population structure and morph-specific differences in tristylous Lythrum salicaria

    Evolution

    (1996)
  • M.A. Aizen et al.

    Forest fragmentation, pollination, and plant reproduction in a chaco dry forest, Argentina

    Ecology

    (1994)
  • W.C. Allee et al.

    Principles of animal ecology

    (1949)
  • F.W. Allendorf

    Isolation, gene flow, and genetic differentiation among populations

  • J. Antonovics et al.

    Ecological genetics of metapopulationsThe Silene-Ustilago plant–pathogen system

  • C.E. Bach

    Effects of host plant patch size on herbivore densityPatterns

    Ecology

    (1988)
  • A.M. Baker et al.

    Evolution and maintenance of stigma-height dimorphism in Narcissus. I. Floral variation and style-morph ratios

    Heredity

    (2000)
  • S.C.H. Barrett

    Heterostylous genetic polymorphismsmodel systems for evolutionary analysis

  • S.C.H. Barrett et al.

    Effects of a change in the level of inbreeding on the genetic load

    Nature

    (1991)
  • S.C.H. Barrett et al.

    Genetic and evolutionary consequences of small population size in plantsimplications for conservation

  • S.C.H. Barrett et al.

    The dissolution of a complex genetic polymorphismThe evolution of self-fertilization in tristylous Eichhornia paniculata (pontederiaceae)

    Evolution

    (1989)
  • T. Bataillon et al.

    Inbreeding depression due to mildly deleterious mutations in finite populationsSize does matter

    Genetical Research

    (2000)
  • M. Begon et al.

    EcologyIndividuals, populations and communities

    (1990)
  • G. Booy et al.

    Genetic diversity and the survival of populations

    Plant Biology

    (2000)
  • M.S. Boyce

    Population viability analysis

    Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics

    (1992)
  • Broggi, M.F., & Schlegel, H. (1989). Mindestbedarf an naturnahen Flächen in der Kulturlandschaft. Bericht 31 des...
  • J.M. Bullock et al.

    Long distance seed dispersal by windMeasuring and modelling the tail of the curve

    Oecologia

    (2000)
  • J.J. Burdon et al.

    Temporal and spatial changes in a metapopulation of the rust pathogen Triphragmium ulmariae and its host, Filipendula ulmaria

    Journal of Ecology

    (1995)
  • J.J. Burdon et al.

    Coevolution at multiple spatial scalesLinum marginaleMelampsoralini—from the individual to the species

    Evolutionary Ecology

    (2000)
  • D.L. Byers et al.

    Do plant populations purge their genetic load? Effects of population size and mating history on inbreeding depression

    Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics

    (1999)
  • R.N. Calvo

    Four-year growth and reproduction of Cyclopogon cranichoides (Orchidaceae) in South Florida

    American Journal of Botany

    (1990)
  • D.R. Campbell

    Pollen and gene dispersalThe influences of competition for pollination

    Evolution

    (1985)
  • U. Carlsson et al.

    Infection by pathogens and population age of host plants

    Journal of Ecology

    (1990)
  • U. Carlsson-Graner et al.

    The spatial distribution of plant populations, disease dynamics and evolution of resistance

    Oikos

    (2002)
  • D. Charlesworth et al.

    Inbreeding depression and its evolutionary consequences

    Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics

    (1987)
  • D. Couvet et al.

    The maintenance of nucleocytoplasmic polymorphism in a metapopulationThe case of gynodioecy

    The American Naturalist

    (1998)
  • T.J. de Jong et al.

    The evolution of generation time in metapopulations of monocarpic perennial plantsSome theoretical considerations and the example of the rare thistle Carlina vulgaris

    Evolutionary Ecology

    (2000)
  • M.R. Dudash et al.

    Inbreeding and outbreeding depression in fragmented populations

  • C.G. Eckert et al.

    Stochastic loss of style morphs from populations of tristylous Lythrum salicaria and Decodon verticillatus (Lythraceae)

    Evolution

    (1992)
  • P.R. Ehrlich et al.

    Biodiversity studiesScience and policy

    Science

    (1991)
  • H. Ellenberg

    Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen in ökologischer dynamischer und historischer Sicht

    (1996)
  • N.C. Ellstrand

    Gene flow by pollenImplications for plant conservation genetics

    Oikos

    (1992)
  • N.C. Ellstrand

    Gene flow among seed plant populations

    New Forests

    (1992)
  • N.C. Ellstrand et al.

    Population genetic consequences of small population sizeImplications for plant conservation

    Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics

    (1993)
  • L. Ericson et al.

    Spatial and temporal dynamics of epidemics of the rust fungus Uromyces valerianae on populations of its host Valeriana salina

    Journal of Ecology

    (1999)
  • O. Eriksson

    Regional dynamics of plantsA review of evidence for remnant, source–sink and metapopulations

    Oikos

    (1996)
  • Å. Eriksson et al.

    Population dynamics of the perennial Plantago media in semi-natural grasslands

    Journal of Vegetation Science

    (2000)
  • J.-B. Ferdy et al.

    Pollinator-induced density dependence in deceptive species

    Oikos

    (1999)
  • M. Fischer et al.

    RAPD variation among and within small and large populations of the rare clonal plant Ranunculus reptans (Ranunculaceae)

    American Journal of Botany

    (2000)
  • M. Fischer et al.

    Mating structure and inbreeding and outbreeding depression in the rare plant Gentianella germanica (Gentianaceae)

    American Journal of Botany

    (1997)
  • Cited by (187)

    • Direct and indirect effects of fragmentation on seed dispersal traits in a fragmented agricultural landscape

      2021, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      Such fragmentation-dependent effects on abiotic and biotic environmental characteristics may also pose selection on dispersal-related traits, resulting in additional indirect paths through which fragmentation affects dispersal. For example, fragmentation is often associated with reduction in plant population sizes and with reduced accessibility for pollinators (Lázaro et al., 2020; Lienert, 2004); eventually leading to reduced genetic diversity and increased inbreeding load (Legrand et al., 2017). These changes can subsequently elevate levels of inbreeding depression in the population, a process which in many cases is associated with reduced seed mass.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text