Elsevier

Futures

Volume 51, July 2013, Pages 59-66
Futures

Business wargaming for teaching strategy making

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2013.06.002Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Complex and dynamic environments pose a challenge to teaching management students.

  • Business wargaming, a dynamic strategic simulation, can address these challenges.

  • Reflections from classroom experiences explain the application.

Abstract

An increasingly complex and dynamic business environment requires new approaches to teaching strategy to management students. Business wargaming, a dynamic strategic simulation, is discussed as a management simulation which can respond to the contemporary challenges in management education. Reflecting on the practical use of business wargaming in the classroom, it is described how such simulations prepare management students for making strategic decisions in complex and dynamic environments characterised by high uncertainty concerning the future.

Introduction

Organisations have in the past been urged to develop foresight [1], [2] and accordingly a variety of approaches and concepts, such as futures studies, strategic, corporate or organisational foresight, trend research, strategic early warning systems, strategic issue management or scenario planning have emerged. In particular scenario planning [3], [4], [5], [6] has gained increasing recognition [7] in corporations as a tool to develop alternative pictures of the future.

However, how has this notion of developing foresight in order to deal with complexity and uncertainty, in particular in respect to the future, translated into the education of management students? Schoemaker [8, p. 119] argues: “The traditional paradigm of business schools, with its strong focus on analytical models and reductionism, is not well suited to handle the ambiguity and high rate of change facing many industries today”. Increasingly master programmes on futures studies or executive education on scenario planning or corporate foresight are offered at universities, the question remains how to further integrate futures thinking into the education of management students, besides only mentioning scenario planning as a relevant tool for strategy development.

While it has been argued that simulations have positive effects on learning [9], [10], it appears that simulations, in their various formats, are appropriate for educating management students, in particular if these simulations are future oriented and therefore expose management students to futures thinking. This paper introduces and discusses a specific from of simulations, which appears to be very well suited to familiarising management students with strategising in a dynamic and complex environment. This points to business wargaming, which can be perceived as a dynamic strategic simulation.

In the following, it will be demonstrated that an increasingly complex and dynamic business environment requires new approaches to teaching strategy to management students. The role of simulations in management education will be discussed, followed by an introduction to business wargaming. Experiences with the use of business wargaming in the classroom will then be presented.

Section snippets

Challenges for management education

The critics of MBA programmes [11], [12], [13], [14] have in return been criticised for not providing evidence to support their claim [15]. Schoemaker [8, p. 122] makes the point “that the MBA culture, includes a rational, reductionism mindset that serves business well in time of stability but not when discontinuity is upon us and entrepreneurship is called for”. Schoemaker [8], who has published widely on issues such as scenario planning [5], [6] and on Ansoff's [16] concept of “weak signals”

Simulations in management education

Why use simulations in management education? Simulations have been credited with having positive effects on learning [25]. The use of simulations in education, and especially in military training, has a long history [26]; the later discussion on the history of business wargaming will underline this. Faria et al. [27] state that in the past 40 years, simulations have proliferated in many areas. Simulations have been used in strategic management courses [28], but also in operations management

Introducing business wargaming

Business wargaming has been credited as a valuable approach in fields of applications, including the military, including a historic perspective [37], management [38], in developing strategies [39], [40], [41], [42], in competitive strategies [43], testing strategies [44], [45], [46], [47], public policy [41], or for instance transportation planning [48]. In addition to the few comprehensive accounts of the military application to wargaming [49], [50], [51], recent publications on the

Reflecting on the application of business wargaming in the classroom

The aim of this section is to reflect on the application of business wargaming in the classroom. On the one hand, the author will reflect on experiences derived from six years of teaching strategy to diverse group of students, including MBAs, bachelor and management students, design und cultural studies students, as well as part-time MBAs across Europe by applying business wargaming. On the other hand this reflection will describe how a business wargame can be carried out in a classroom.

Conclusion

Meeting contemporary challenges in management education is a difficult task. The purpose of this article was to describe how business wargaming could be used to meet these challenges. The main advantages of a business wargame are that it gives some structure, while leaving room for dynamics, creativity, and discussions among the participants. Above all, it actively engages the participants in a future-oriented learning experience. “Simulation brings learning from the third person to the first

References (69)

  • P.J.H. Schoemaker

    Scenario planning: a tool for strategic thinking

    MIT Sloan Management Review

    (1995)
  • D. Rigby et al.

    Management Tools & Trends 2011

    (2011)
  • P.J.H. Schoemaker

    The future challenges of business: rethinking management education and research

    California Management Review

    (2008)
  • P.P. Perla et al.

    Why wargaming works

    Naval War College Review

    (2011)
  • H. Mintzberg

    Managers not MBAs

    (2004)
  • J. Pfeffer et al.

    The business school ‘business’: some lessons from the US experience

    Journal of Management Studies

    (2004)
  • K. Starkey et al.

    Rethinking the business school

    Journal of Management Studies

    (2004)
  • R. Khurana

    From Higher Aims to Hired Hands: The Social Transformation of American Business Schools and the Unfulfilled Promise of Management as a Profession

    (2007)
  • A. Hay et al.

    More success than meets the eye – a challenge to critiques of the mba: possibilities for critical management education?

    Management Learning

    (2008)
  • I.H. Ansoff

    Managing strategic surprise by response to weak signals

    California Management Review

    (1975)
  • G.S. Day et al.

    Scanning the periphery

    Harvard Business Review

    (2005)
  • G.S. Day et al.

    Peripheral Vision: Detecting the Weak Signals That Will Make or Break Your Company

    (2006)
  • G.S. Day et al.

    Extended intelligence networks: minding and mining the periphery

  • P.J.H. Schoemaker et al.

    How to make sense of weak signals

    MIT Sloan Management Review

    (2009)
  • M. Reynolds et al.

    Critical management education and action-based learning: synergies and contradictions

    Academy of Management Learning and Education

    (2004)
  • C. Prichard

    Three moves for engaging students in critical management studies

    Management Learning

    (2009)
  • A.J. Casey et al.

    Enhancing the ability to think strategically: a learning model

    Management Learning

    (2010)
  • P.H. Anderson et al.

    Business simulations and cognitive learning

    Simulation and Gaming

    (2009)
  • R. Smith

    The long history of gaming in military training

    Simulation and Gaming

    (2010)
  • A.J. Faria et al.

    Developments in business gaming

    Simulation and Gaming

    (2009)
  • P. Thavikulwat et al.

    A constructivist approach to designing business simulations for strategic management

    Simulation and Gaming

    (2010)
  • S. Carter

    Teaching managerial economics with dynamic competitive simulations: wargaming in the classroom

    Journal of Economics and Economic Education Research

    (2002)
  • D. Crookall et al.

    Acting, knowing, learning, simulating, gaming

    Simulation and Gaming

    (2009)
  • D.A. Kolb

    Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development

    (1984)
  • Cited by (14)

    • Making strategy “Real”: Using reality television for innovating teaching approaches

      2019, International Journal of Management Education
      Citation Excerpt :

      In short, management students often lack the practical work knowledge that is required to understand general management, strategy, and entrepreneurship concepts. Consequently, while it may be straightforward to teach frameworks, tools for analysis, and even terminology, students are often unable to move beyond definitions or new terms and categories of meaning when tested with questions that are more applied (Schneider & Lieb, 2004; Schwarz, 2013). There isn't enough “Oh, I get it!

    • Combining scenario planning and business wargaming to better anticipate future competitive dynamics

      2019, Futures
      Citation Excerpt :

      On its own, business wargaming is primarily based on the selected competitors or stakeholders included in the simulation. Perceiving emphasizes that prior to designing a business wargame, assumptions about the future course of the industry must be made to include meaningful competitors (Oriesek & Schwarz, 2008; Schwarz, 2009, 2011, 2013). To select meaningful competitors, the perceiving phase should leverage data collection from different viewpoints (e.g., experience from outside the focal industry, other geographical regions, and lead markets) and different time horizons.

    • Testing transformative energy scenarios through causal layered analysis gaming

      2017, Technological Forecasting and Social Change
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the CLA game, existing sociocultural energy scenarios were evaluated and iteratively improved through gaming. The use of gaming has a long history in the field of futures studies, from the war games developed by Herman Kahn and others after World War II to more recent applications in simulating students' future careers, in prediction markets and in business strategy (Kahn, 2007; Ollila et al., 2014; Prokesch et al., 2015; Schwarz, 2013). In futures studies, gamification is closely related to the concepts of experimental and immersive futuring.

    • Toward a simulated replica of futures: Classification and possible trajectories of simulation in futures studies

      2016, Futures
      Citation Excerpt :

      Of such nature, is business wargaming (Schwarz, 2013) which is a form of dynamic strategic simulation and can be used to teach management students “Kurtz (Kurtz, 2003) describes a business wargame as a role-playing simulation of a dynamic business situation. Each team in the wargame is cast in the role of certain stakeholder (Schwarz, 2013). A generic term for this kind of simulations would be “management simulation games” of Forrester where participants are exposed to the complexity of a specific circumstance trying to figure out why certain dynamics occur (Forrester, 2007) .”

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text