Liquid chromatography-flame ionisation detection using a nebuliser/spray chamber interface. Part 2. Comparison of functional group responses

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2012.02.035Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open access

Abstract

The application of a LC-nebuliser/spray chamber interface-flame ionisation detection has been demonstrated for the superheated water liquid chromatography of a wide range of aliphatic and aromatic analytes. The linearity and sensitivity of the response of volatile and involatile analytes have been compared. The response of the detector toward different analytes is similar to that in GC-FID and for volatile analytes was comparable to UV detection. However, the responses from involatile analytes, such as amino acids and carbohydrates, were poor and often lower than for a refractive index detector.

Highlights

► A LC-nebuliser/spray chamber interface-flame ionisation detection for superheated water liquid chromatography responds to a wide range of aliphatic and aromatic analytes. ► Linearity and sensitivity of the response of volatile and involatile analytes are compared. ► Response of detector compared to GC-FID and to UV and RI detectors.

Keywords

LC
Superheated water chromatography
FID
Nebuliser
Spray chamber
Functional group responses

Cited by (0)