Re-victimization patterns in a national longitudinal sample of children and youth☆
Introduction
The concept of re-victimization or repeat victimization is increasingly of interest to researchers who study maltreatment and crime. This interest is grounded in evidence that persons who experience one victimization (an assault, a burglary, sexual abuse, etc.) are at greater risk for subsequent victimizations and the obvious merit of interrupting this pattern (Weisel, 2005).
The issue has been addressed in different ways in somewhat different literatures with different conceptualizations and terminologies. In some research, for example, the term re-victimization has meant a connection between a childhood victimization and an adult victimization, such as child sexual abuse and adult rape (Arata, 1999; Arata & Lindman, 2002; Desai, Arias, Thompson, & Basile, 2002; Merrill et al., 1999; Messman and Long, 1996, Messman and Long, 2000; Noll, Horowitz, Bonanno, Trickett, & Putnam, 2003; Wyatt, Guthrie, & Notgrass, 1992). In other research, where the more frequently used term is repeat victimization, it has meant two victimizations occurring in closer proximity, such as two burglaries over the course of several years (Farrell, Philips, & Pease, 1995; Hope, Bryan, Trickett, & Osborn, 2001; Lauritsen & Quinet, 1995; Menard & Huizinga, 2001; Outlaw, Ruback, & Britt, 2002). In yet another research context, it has meant the recurrence of an episode of child maltreatment typically at the hands of the same perpetrator after a first episode was identified (Depanfilis & Zuravin, 1999).
Despite these variations, an overall limitation to the re-victimization and repeat victimization literature has been the tendency to consider victimization in somewhat narrow terms. Typically, studies have examined the recurrence of only one or a few kinds of victimizations, for example sexual abuse or violent crime. But the possibility also exists that victimizations of one sort, such as child maltreatment, may create a vulnerability for other different kinds of victimization, such as peer assault or sexual victimization. Moreover, any single kind of victimization may signal a generalized vulnerability in that child for victimization. This could also lead to strong associations across victimization types. Defining re-victimization too narrowly as the reoccurrence of only a single kind of victimization may substantially underestimate the real magnitude of risk associated with victimization. In this article, we will be considering victimizations broadly to include conventional crime victimization, like theft and assault; child maltreatment, such as physical and sexual abuse and neglect; peer victimizations, like bullying; and even exposure to domestic and community violence.
Another limitation to the re-victimization literature is that it has tended, like much of the victimization field as a whole, to view victimization as an event rather than as a condition. Victimization has often been treated as a somewhat unusual, individual event of a particularly traumatic sort. But many victimizations are ongoing, as the literatures on bullying, child abuse, and intimate partner violence have made clear. Moreover, studies of peer relationships among young children have increasingly suggested that some children become trapped in a victimization condition, in which they are subjected to repeated attacks of different types from different children (Kochenderfer Ladd, 2003; Kochenderfer Ladd & Ladd, 2001). Such victimization proneness can continue for years. This suggests that an important focus of re-victimization studies should be on the persistence of victimization as a condition, rather than simply the recurrence of certain kinds of victimization events.
Still another limitation to the re-victimization literature is that it has not devoted much attention to the issue of how individuals escape re-victimization, or what might be termed “victimization desistence.” If victimization is viewed as an unusual event, then it can be assumed that most victimized individuals will not be re-victimized, and, therefore, all that needs to be explained is subsequent re-victimization. But if victimization is a persisting condition for many youth, then the question of how they escape such a condition is both interesting and of great practical and clinical importance.
To the extent that vulnerability for re-victimization has been considered, it has mostly been analyzed in terms of what have been called “static” risk factors, things about individuals and their conditions that are impossible or very difficult to change. Thus, questions typically studied are whether children from some ethnic groups or from lower socioeconomic status are more likely to be re-victimized. However, the search for ways to prevent re-victimization and promote desistence needs to focus on risk and protective factors more amenable to manipulation or amelioration. Such a search would focus on short-term and modifiable antecedents to the persistence and desistence of victimization.
The findings on re-victimization in this paper come from an ongoing longitudinal study of a comprehensive range of victimizations experienced by children and youth across the full spectrum of child development. The screening for a broad range of victimizations allowed an analysis of how some kinds of victimization create vulnerability for other kinds of victimization. It also allowed the identification of children with extensive victimization profiles, children who might be considered trapped in a victimization condition. The interviews with children and parents at 1-year time intervals also allowed for the study of re-victimization over a relatively short time period, and the identification of relatively short-term antecedents of persistent victimization.
There were several keys questions of interest in this exploratory analysis:
- 1.
Are children victimized in one year indeed at considerably increased likelihood to be victimized again during the next year? Based on the previous literature, we expected such enduring vulnerability to be present.
- 2.
Does victimization of one sort create vulnerability for victimization of another sort? We expected that it would over a broad range of victimizations, if only because different victimizations do have common risk factors (Finkelhor & Asdigian, 1996). We also expected, however, that repeat victimization of the same sort might be more common than one kind of victimization leading to a different kind of victimization.
- 3.
Are highly victimized youth in one year particularly vulnerable to re-victimization the next? We expected the most intensively victimized youth to be the ones most vulnerable to re-victimization. In earlier analyses of this sample (Finkelhor, Ormrod, & Turner, 2007), we identified a subset of children with high levels of different kinds of victimization, a group we have termed “poly-victims,” for whom victimization was a potentially generalized condition rather than just a set of events. We expected these children to be especially vulnerable to continued victimizations. Moreover, based on literature suggesting the particularly large developmental insults posed by such experiences as child maltreatment and sexual abuse (Dube et al., 2005; Felitti, Anda, & Nordenberg, 1998), we also expected such victimizations might be particularly powerful “gateways” to persisting victimization or persisting high levels of victimization.
- 4.
What are risk factors that may lead to conditions of high victimization vulnerability and persistence, as well as resilience factors that may allow children to escape or “desist from” such a condition? A diverse range of factors have been cited as possible risk factors for different kinds of victimization (Finkelhor & Asdigian, 1996), including such features as family problems and instability, neighborhood conditions and life course adversities. Other factors such as social support and social competence have been seen as resilience factors. We expected some of these to contribute to revictimization vulnerability and desistence.
Section snippets
Participants
This research is based on data from the Developmental Victimization Survey (DVS), a longitudinal study designed to assess a comprehensive range of childhood victimizations across gender, race, and developmental stage. Analyses are based on a sample of 1467 respondents who participated in two waves of data collection obtained approximately 1 year apart.
The first wave of the survey, conducted between December 2002, and February 2003, assessed the experiences of a nationally representative sample
Data analysis
For purposes of comparison, children within the sample were grouped in a number of ways, based on their victimization experiences. Those who had suffered any victimization within each type of aggregated victimization (conventional crime, property crime, physical assault, peer/sibling victimization, sexual victimization, maltreatment, witnessed/indirect victimization) in both Year 1 and Year 2 were considered “re-victimized” (with regard to that specific type of victimization). Similarly,
Results
Victimization rates in the Year 2 were roughly comparable to rates in the Year 1 (Table 1), but there were declines in most categories. Some of the decline may be due to the aging of the sample. Another factor may be that respondents, familiar with the interview format in the second wave, knew that each screener endorsement led to a series of follow-up questions, and may have curtailed endorsements to limit the length of the interview.
Discussion
Taking a comprehensive and longitudinal perspective does highlight the burden of victimization on children. Large numbers of children experience a diverse variety of victimizations that continue over time. Not only does this study reconfirm the findings from Year 1 that children suffer high quantities of different sorts of victimization (Finkelhor, Ormrod, Turner, & Hamby, 2005), it also emphasizes that such victimizations have a very high likelihood of persisting. Children victimized in one
Conclusion
The second year of the Developmental Victimization Survey clearly confirms that children suffer from a considerable burden of victimization that is both diverse and repetitive. It points the need for and the possibility of charting the interrelationships among victimizations across time. With a broad view of the different forms that victimization can take, researchers should look much more closely at the individual and environmental factors that allow victimization conditions to persist, as
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank Theodore Cross, Kevin Smith and the Family Violence Research Seminar for their helpful comments. Thanks also to Kelly Foster for editorial assistance.
References (41)
- et al.
The Trauma Symptom Checklist for Young Children (TSCYC): Reliability and association with abuse exposure in a multi-site study
Child abuse & Neglect
(2001) - et al.
Long-term consequences of childhood sexual abuse by gender of victim
Journal of Preventive Medicine
(2005) - et al.
Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study
American Journal of Preventative Medicine
(1998) - et al.
The JVQ: Reliability, validity, and national norms
Child abuse & neglect
(2005) - et al.
Poly-victimization: A neglected component in child victimization trauma
Child Abuse & Neglect
(2007) - et al.
Pattern of teen exposure to a community-based violence prevention project
Journal of Adolescent Health
(1992) - et al.
Child sexual abuse and its relationship to revictimization in adult women: A review
Clinical Psychology Review
(1996) Sexual revictimization and PTSD: An exploratory study
Journal of Child Sexual Abuse
(1999)- et al.
Marriage, child abuse, and sexual revictimization
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
(2002) - et al.
Analysis of sexual behavior in France (ACSF): A comparison between two modes of investigation: Telephone survey and face-to-face survey
AIDS
(1992)
Sexual violence prevention through bystander education: An experimental evaluation
Journal of Community Psychology
Effects of telephone & face-to-face communication on rated extent of self-disclosure by female college students
Psychological Reports
Trauma Symptoms Checklist for Children (TSCC): Professional manual
Sexual contact between children and adults: Tracking the long-term effects
American Sociological Review
Asking sensitive behavioral questions in telephone interviews
International Quarterly of Community Health Education
Epidemiology of child maltreatment recurrences
Social Service Review
Childhood victimization and subsequent adult revictimization assessed in a nationally representative sample of women
Violence and Victims
Maternal support following disclosure of incest
American Journal of Orthopsychiatry
Like taking candy: Why does repeat victimization occur?
British Journal of Criminology
Cited by (393)
“The story of the abuse as the story of my life”: Narrative analysis of the stories of survivors of prolonged child sexual abuse
2023, Children and Youth Services ReviewProstitution in the shadow of life-long sexual abuse: Arab women’s retrospective experiences
2024, Journal of Elder Abuse and Neglect
- ☆
For the purposes of compliance with Section 507 of PL 104-208 (the “Stevens Amendment”), readers are advised that 100% of the funds for this program are derived from federal sources (this project was supported by Grant Nos. 1999-JP-FX-1101 & 2002-JW-BX-002, awarded by the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Office of Justice Programs, US Department of Justice). The total amount of federal funding involved is $584,549. Points of views or opinions in this document are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the US Department of Justice.