Elsevier

Animal Behaviour

Volume 77, Issue 6, June 2009, Pages 1501-1505
Animal Behaviour

Personality counts: the effect of boldness on shoal choice in three-spined sticklebacks

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.03.004Get rights and content

The grouping behaviour of fish is a widespread phenomenon of high biological significance but little is known as to how consistent individual behavioural differences may affect group joining preferences. When given the option to join either a shy or a bold shoal of three-spined sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus, both shy and bold individuals showed a strong preference for associating with bold fish. Personality type interacted with individual hunger levels to affect the extent of association, suggesting important strategy variation by focal fish in a competitive foraging environment. Furthermore, shoals modified their behaviour in relation to the focal individual. Individual behavioural differences were shown to have a complex role in influencing association preferences as well as driving previously unrecognized behavioural modifications in foraging groups.

Section snippets

Study Organism and Equipment

Stocks of three-spined sticklebacks were collected with sweep nets from the Histon and Swaffham Bulbeck areas of the River Cam, U.K. during 2007. They were transported to the laboratory in large buckets and immediately transferred to large glass aquaria where they were kept at 17 ± 1 °C on a 10:14 h light:dark regime for at least 1 month before being used in experiments. This study is part of a series of experiments that were approved under a nonregulatory procedures framework by the Animal Users

Results

Focal fish, irrespective of their personality and hunger status, showed a preference for spending time with the bold shoal (test for intercept of GLM being different from the expected value for no preference, that is, c  arcsine (sqrt(0.5)): t208 = 2.459, P = 0.015). There was also a significant interaction between personality of focal fish and hunger level influencing the amount of time spent in the zone nearest the bold shoal (GLM: F1,208 = 4.81, P = 0.029; Fig. 2), mostly caused by a decrease in the

Discussion

Regardless of personality or hunger state, focal fish preferred to associate with groups of bold individuals rather than shy shoals. This result is somewhat surprising, as it suggests that matching one's own phenotype is not a major factor in choosing with which shoal to associate. On the other hand, recent work on guppies, Poecilia reticulata, by Dyer et al. (2009) found that bold shoals have higher foraging success than shy shoals, so focal fish might be trying to associate with the shoal

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to two anonymous referees for their helpful comments on the manuscript. This work was funded by a grant from the Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour to A.M. and a NERC studentship to J.H. We thank I. Goldstone for assisting with care of the fish and for building the equipment used in the experiments.

References (39)

  • C. Theodorakis

    Size segregation and the effects of oddity on predation risk in minnow schools

    Animal Behaviour

    (1989)
  • M.E.M. Verbeek et al.

    Consistent individual differences in early exploratory behaviour of male great tits

    Animal Behaviour

    (1994)
  • A.M. Bell

    Future directions in behavioural syndromes research

    Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B

    (2007)
  • B. Borg et al.

    Mechanisms in the photoperiodic control of reproduction in the stickleback

    Behaviour

    (2004)
  • C. Brown et al.

    Correlation between boldness and body mass in natural populations of the poeciliid Brachyrhaphis episcopi

    Journal of Fish Biology

    (2007)
  • J. Buckingham et al.

    Shoaling decisions in female swordtails: how do fish gauge group size?

    Behaviour

    (2007)
  • J. Cote et al.

    Social personalities influence natal dispersal in a lizard

    Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B

    (2007)
  • M. Crawley

    Statistical Computing: an Introduction to Data Analysis Using S-PLUS

    (2002)
  • J.R.G. Dyer et al.

    Shoal composition determines foraging success in the guppy

    Behavioral Ecology

    (2009)
  • Cited by (90)

    • The effect of idiosyncrasy on aggregation in group-living organisms

      2022, Journal of Theoretical Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Interindividual behavioural differences can also be associated with leadership (Petit and Bon, 2010; Couzin et al., 2005; Pettit et al., 2015), hierarchy (Goessmann et al., 2000; Abe et al., 2021), the influence of informed or naïve individuals on the group behaviour (Kadak and Miller, 2020) or personality/ idiosyncrasy (Aplin et al., 2014; Planas-Sitjà and Deneubourg, 2018; Michelena et al., 2010). For this latter case, it has been shown that the classical shy-bold axis affects the frequency of initiations and contributes to coordination during foraging, where bold individuals emerge as leaders and shy individuals as followers (Harcourt et al., 2009). The expression of interindividual differences occurs at many different time scales, as they may be the result from social life and from individual’s histories.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text