Varieties of Confirmation Bias

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60315-1Get rights and content

Publisher Summary

This chapter reviews research concerning a variety of confirmation biases and discusses what they have in common and where they differ. The overall picture is one of heterogeneous, complex, and inconsistent phenomena, from which it is nevertheless possible to discern a general direction, namely a general tendency for people to believe too much in their favored hypothesis. The chapter discusses ideas about how to reconcile the apparent heterogeneity and the apparent generality of confirmation biases. There has been considerable interest among cognitive and social psychologists in the idea that people tend to hang on to their favored hypotheses with unwarranted tenacity and confidence. This tendency has been referred to as perseverance of beliefs, hypothesis preservation, and confirmation bias. Research in this area presents a rather heterogeneous collection of findings: a set of confirmation biases, rather than one unified confirmation bias. There are often substantial task-to-task differences in the observed phenomena, their consequences, and the underlying cognitive processes. There is no consensus about such basic questions as what is a favored hypothesis, against what norm is a belief unwarranted, and under what circumstances are people susceptible or not susceptible to a bias.

References (92)

  • Z. Kunda et al.

    Directional questions direct self-conceptions

    Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

    (1993)
  • C.R.M. McKenzie

    The accuracy of intuitive judgment strategies: Covariation assessment and Bayesian inference

    Cognitive Psychology

    (1994)
  • R.B. Skov et al.

    Information-gathering processes: Diagnosticity, hypothesis-confirmatory strategies, and perceived hypothesis confirmation

    Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

    (1986)
  • M. Snyder et al.

    Testing hypotheses about other people: The use of historical knowledge

    Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

    (1979)
  • M. Spranca et al.

    Omission and commission in judgment and choice

    Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

    (1991)
  • Y. Trope et al.

    Information gathering strategies in hypothesis-testing

    Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

    (1983)
  • Y. Trope et al.

    Sensitivity to alternatives in social hypothesis-testing

    Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

    (1987)
  • G. Agostinelli et al.

    Detecting and identifying change: Addition versus deletion

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

    (1986)
  • J.R. Anderson

    The adaptive character of thought

    (1990)
  • J.R. Anderson

    Is human cognition adaptive?

    Behavioral and Brain Sciences

    (1991)
  • J. Baron

    Rationality and intelligence

    (1985)
  • D.J. Bem

    Self-perception theory

  • R. Beyth-Marom et al.

    Diagnosticity and pseudodiagnosticity

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1983)
  • E. Brunswik

    Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments

    (1956)
  • L. Cosmides et al.

    Cognitive adaptations for social exchange

  • M.E. Doherty et al.

    The influence of feedback and diagnostic data on pseudodiagnosticity

    Bulletin of the Psychonomics Society

    (1981)
  • K. Dunbar

    How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories

  • H.J. Einhorn et al.

    Confidence in judgment: Persistence of the illusion of validity

    Psychological Review

    (1978)
  • EvansJ.St.B.T.

    The psychology of deductive reasoning

    (1982)
  • EvansJ.St.B.T.

    Bias in human reasoning: Causes and consequences

    (1989)
  • EvansJ.St.B.T. et al.

    Human reasoning: The psychology of deduction

    (1993)
  • H.H. Farris et al.

    Sensible reasoning in two tasks: Rule discovery and hypothesis evaluation

    Memory & Cognition

    (1989)
  • R.H. Fazio et al.

    The feature-positive effect in the self-perception process: Does not doing matter as much as doing?

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

    (1982)
  • P.J. Feltovitch et al.

    The role and development of medical knowledge in diagnostic expertise

  • B. Fischhoff et al.

    Hypothesis evaluation from a Bayesian perspective

    Psychological Review

    (1983)
  • A. Fratianne et al.

    Assessing causal relations by dynamic hypothesis testing

    (1993)
  • J. Friedrich

    Primary error detection and minimization (PEDMIN) strategies in social cognition: A reinterpretation of confirmation bias phenomena

    Psychological Review

    (1993)
  • D.C. Funder

    Errors and mistakes: Evaluating the accuracy of social judgment

    Psychological Bulletin

    (1987)
  • J. Gnepp et al.

    Recognition of uncertainty in emotional inferences: Reasoning about emotionally equivocal situations

    Developmental Psychology

    (1992)
  • M.E. Gorman

    How the possibility of error affects falsification on a task that models scientific problem solving

    British Journal of Psychology

    (1986)
  • M.E. Gorman

    Error, falsification, and scientific inference: An experimental investigation

    Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

    (1989)
  • R.A. Griggs et al.

    The elusive thematic-materials effect in Wason's selection task

    British Journal of Psychology

    (1982)
  • E. Hearst et al.

    Additional versus deletion as a signal

    Animal Learning & Behavior

    (1989)
  • S.J. Hoch

    Counterfactual reasoning and accuracy in predicting personal events

    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition

    (1985)
  • S.J. Hoch et al.

    Consumer learning: Advertising and the ambiguity of product experience

    Journal of Consumer Research

    (1986)
  • S.J. Hoch et al.

    Cue redundancy and extra logical inferences in a deductive reasoning task

    Memory & Cognition

    (1983)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text