Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Exploration of Extreme Environments with Currentand Emerging Robot Systems

  • Defense, Military, and Surveillance Robotics (S Ferrari and P Zhu, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Robotics Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The discovery of living organisms under extreme environmental conditions of pressure, temperature, and chemical composition on Earth has opened up the possibility of existence and persistence of life in extreme environment pockets across the solar system. These environments range from the many intriguing moons, to the deep atmospheres of Venus and even the giant gas planets, to the small icy worlds of comets and Kuiper Belt Objects (KBOs). Exploring these environments can ascertain the range of conditions that can support life and can also identify planetary processes that are responsible for generating and sustaining habitable worlds. These environments are also time capsules into early formation of the solar system and will provide vital clues of how our early solar system gave way to the current planets and moons.

Recent Findings

Over the last few decades, numerous missions started with flyby spacecraft, followed by orbiting satellites and missions with orbiter/lander capabilities. Since then, there have been numerous missions that have utilized rovers of ever-increasing size and complexity, equipped with state-of-the-art laboratories on wheels. Although current generations of rovers achieve mobility through wheels, there are fundamental limitations that prevent these rovers from accessing rugged environments, cliffs, canyons, and caves. These rugged environments are often the first places geologist look to observe stratification from geohistorical processes. There is an important need for new robot mobility solutions, like hopping, rolling, crawling, and walking that can access these rugged environments like cliffs, canyons, and caves. These new generations of rovers have some extraordinary capabilities including being able to grip onto rocks like NASA/JPL LEMUR 2, operate in swarms such as MIT’s microbots, or have high-specific energy fuel cell power supply that is approximately 40-fold higher than conventional lithium ion batteries to Stanford/NASA JPL’s Hedgehog which is able to hop and somersault in low-gravity environments such asteroids. All of these mobility options and supporting technologies have been proposed and developed to explore these hard-to-reach unconventional environments.

Summary

This article provides a review of the robotic systems developed over the past few decades, in addition to new state-of-the-art concepts that are leading contenders for future missions to explore extreme environments on Earth and off-world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Assessment Group (OPAG). Scientific goals and pathways for exploration of the outer solar system: a report of the Outer Planets, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  2. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. NASA space technology roadmaps and priorities revisited. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2016. https://doi.org/10.17226/23582.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Siddiqi AA. Beyond Earth: a chronicle of deep space exploration, 1958–2016 (PDF), The NASA history series. second ed. Washington, DC: NASA History Program Office; 2018. p. 1. ISBN 9781626830424. LCCN 2017059404. SP2018–4041

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lindemann A, Voorhees J. Mars Exploration Rover mobility assembly design, test and performance, Proceedings of 2005 International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 2005, Hawaii.

  5. Lindemann RA, Bickler DB, Harrington BD, Ortiz GM, Voorhees CJ. Mars exploration rover mobility development: mechanical mobility hardware design, development, and testing. IEEE Robot Automat Mag. 2006;19-26, 2006.

  6. Maimone M, et al. Surface navigation and mobility intelligence on the Mars exploration rovers: Intelligence for Space Robotics; 2006.

  7. Winnendael MV, Baglioni P, Vago J, Development of the ESA ExoMars Rover, The 8th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Automation in Space – iSAIRAS, 2005.

  8. Kubota T, Kunii Y, Kuroda Y, Working Group. Japanese lunar robotics exploration by co-operation with lander and rover. J Earth Syst Sci. 2005;114(6):777–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Estier T, et al., Shrimp: a rover architecture for long range Martian mission, 6th ESA Workshop on Advanced Space Technologies for Robotics and Automation, 2000.

  10. Klinker S, Lee CG-Y, Wagner C, Hlawatsch W, Schreyer A-M, Röser H-P. Destination moon and beyond for the micro rover Nanokhod, Proceedings of DGLR International Symposium “To Moon and beyond”, 14–16 March 2007, Bremen.

  11. Wakabayashi S, Sato H, Matsumoto K. Design and mobility evaluation of a crawler-type lunar vehicle, earth and space 2006: engineering, constructions, and operations in challenging environments, 2006.

  12. Klassen B, Linnemann R, Spenneberg D, Kirchner F. Biometric walking robot SCORPION: control and modeling. Robot Auton Syst. 2002;41(2–3):69–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Görner M. Mechatronic concept of crawler from DLR-hand II technology, Diploma Thesis, Institute of Robotics and Mechatronics, German Aerospace Center, 2007

  14. Borst Ch, Fischer M, Hirzinger G. Calculating hand configurations for precision and pinch grasps, Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE/RSJ, International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, October 2002, Lausanne, 2002.

  15. Hirschmüller H. Stereo processing by semi-global matching and mutual information. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2008;30(2):328–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. •• Parness A, Abcouwer N, Fuller C LEMUR 3: a limbed climbing robot for extreme terrain mobility in space, IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 2017. Findings from this study suggest the importance of next-generation robotics with rock-gripping actuators for exploring extreme environments.

  17. Michaud F, de Lafontaine J, Caron S A spherical robot for planetary surface exploration, 6th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence and Robotics & Automation in Space, 2001.

  18. Chemel B, Mutschler E, Schempf H. Cyclops: miniature robotic reconnaissance system, IEEE International Conference on Robotics & Automation, 1999.

  19. Antol J. A new vehicle for planetary surface exploration: the Mars tumbleweed 1st Space Exploration Conference 2005.

  20. University of Toronto. Goran Jurisa Basic, Power-scavenging tumbleweed rover MASc Thesis, 2010.

  21. Batten C, Wentzlaff D. Kichbot: a spherical autonomous robot MIT technical report, 2001.

  22. •• Pavone M, Castillo-Rogez JC, Nesnas IAD, Hoffman JA, Strange NJ. Spacecraft/rover hybrids for the exploration of small solar system bodies, IEEE Aerospace Conference, 2013. Findings from this study shows the unconventional mobility possible using reaction wheels to traverse in low-gravity environments.

  23. Dupius E, Montminy S, Allard P, Hopping robot for planetary exploration 8th iSAIRAS, 2005.

  24. Dubowsky S, Iagnemma K, Liberatore S, Lambeth DM, Plante JS, Boston PJ, A concept mission: microbots for large-scale planetary surface and subsurface exploration, Space Technology and Applications International Forum, 2005.

  25. Kesner SB, Plante J, Boston PJ, Fabian T, Dubowsky S. Mobility and power feasibility of a microbot team system for extraterrestrial cave exploration, IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 2007.

  26. •• Thangavelautham J, Strawser D, Dubowsky S. Long-life micro fuel cell power supply for mobile field sensor network modules. Int J Hydrog Energy. 2017;42(31):1–22 Findings from this study suggest the possibility of next-generation power source (fuel cells) that has 40-fold specific energy of current batteries and that could perform long-term exploration of extreme environments.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Strawser D, Thangavelautham J, Dubowsky S. A passive lithium hydride based hydrogen generator for low-power fuel cells for long-duration applications. Int J Hydrog Energy. 2015:1–36.

  28. Thangavelautham J, Robinson MS, Taits A, McKinney TJ, Amidan S, Polak A. Flying, hopping Pit-Bots for cave and lava tube exploration on the Moon and Mars, 2nd International Workshop on Instrumentation for Planetary Missions, NASA Goddard, Greenbelt, Maryland, 2014.

  29. H. Kalita, A. S. Gholap, J. Thangavelautham, Dynamics and control of a hopping robot for extreme environment exploration on the Moon and Mars, IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, USA, 2020, 7–14 March.

  30. • Kalita H, Morad S, Ravindran A, Thangavelautham J. Path planning and navigation inside off-world lava tubes and caves, IEEE/ION PLANS 2018, Monterey, California. Findings from this study show the path forward to successfully explore off-world lava tubes and caves.

  31. Kalita H, Thangavelautham J. Lunar CubeSat Lander to explore Mare Tranquilitatis pit, AIAA SciTech Forum, Orlando, 2020.

  32. Asbeck AT, Kim S, Ctkosky MR, Provancher WR, Lanzetta M. Scaling hard vertical surfaces with compliant microspine arrays. Int Trans Robot. 2008;24(1).

  33. Kalita H, Thangavelautham J. Multirobot cliff climbing on low-gravity environments, 11th NASA/ESA Conference on Adaptive Hardware and Systems, Pasadena, USA, 2017.

  34. Balaram J, Tokumaru PT. Rotorcrafts for Mars exploration, 11th Int. Planetary Probe Workshop, Lunar and Planetary Institute, No. 1795, June 16–20, Pasadena, USA, 2014.

  35. Kuhl CA, Wright HS, Hunter CA, Guernsey CS, Colozza AJ. Liquid rocket propulsion for atmospheric flight in the proposed ARES Mars scout mission, 40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2004.

  36. Nesnas IAD, Abad-Manterola P, Edlund J, Burdick J. Axel mobility platform for steep terrain excursion and sampling on planetary surfaces, IEEE Aerospace Conference, March 2007.

  37. Huntsberger T, Stroupe A, Aghazarian H, Garrett M, Younse P, Powell M. TRESSA: teamed robots for exploration and science on steep areas. J Field Robotics. 2007;24(11):1015–1031.

Download references

Funding

The University of Arizona’s Space and Terrestrial Robotic Exploration (SpaceTREx) Laboratory and personnel receive funding from US Government agencies including NASA, NASA JPL, and Department of Defense.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jekan Thangavelautham.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Himangshu Kalita and Jekan Thangavelautham report a pending patent on Spherical Robots for Off-World Surface Exploration.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article belongs to the Topical Collection on Defense, Military, and Surveillance Robotics

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kalita, H., Thangavelautham, J. Exploration of Extreme Environments with Currentand Emerging Robot Systems. Curr Robot Rep 1, 97–104 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43154-020-00016-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43154-020-00016-3

Keywords

Navigation