Skip to main content
Log in

Career Performance Progressions of Junior and Senior Elite Track and Field Athletes

  • Original article
  • Published:
Journal of Science in Sport and Exercise Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare and assess differences in the career performance progressions of elite junior and Olympic track and field athletes.

Methods

Annual best performances from top 8 men and women (e.g. finalists) in track and field events at the 2000 World Junior Championships (junior cohort) and the 2000 Olympic Games (Olympic cohort) were examined. Annual bests of these finalists were tracked each year from select groups: sprints (100 m, 200 m), distance (1500 m, 5000 m), jumps (long jump, high jump), throws (discus, shot put). Age of best lifetime performance, age of final posted performance, and improvement from junior-age best to lifetime best performance were compared between groups.

Results

Olympic finalists achieved lifetime best performances at later ages than junior finalists [26.0 ± 4.0 years vs. 21.1 ± 3.5 years; age difference 90% CI (3.7–5.2 years), P < 0.001], and this significant age difference between cohorts was found within all four groups. Olympic finalists improved from under-20 best to lifetime best more so than junior finalists [6.1 ± 4.8% vs. 2.5 ± 2.3%; Age difference 90% CI (2.5–4.8%), P < 0.001]. Of 130 junior finalists, 54 did not improve after age 19, while 19 of 128 Olympic finalists posted no improvement after age 19.

Conclusion

The data suggest that these two populations have different career performance progressions and challenge the notion that achieving elite success as a junior athlete is a prerequisite for the same success at the senior level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alfermann D, Stambulova N. Career transitions and career termination. In: Tenebaum G, Eklund R, editors. Handbook of sport psychology, vol. 3. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley; 2007. p. 712–33.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baker J, Cote J, Abernethy B. Sport-specific practice and the development of expert decision-making in team ball sports. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2003;15(1):12–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baxter-Jones ADG, Maffulli N. Parental influence on sport participation in elite young athletes. J Sports Med Phys Fitn. 2003;43(2):250.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Baxter-Jones ADG, Thompson AM, Malina RM. Growth and maturation in elite young female athletes. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2002;10(1):42–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bennie A, O’Connor D. Athletic transition: an investigation of elite track and field participation in the post-high school years. Change Transform Educ. 2006;9(1):59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Beunen G, Malina RM. Growth and biologic maturation: relevance to athletic performance. In: Hebestreit H, Bar-Or O, editors. The young athlete. Oxford: Blackwell; 2008. p. 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cobley S, Baker J, Wattie N, McKenna J. Annual age-grouping and athlete development: a meta-analytical review of relative age effects in sport. Sports Med. 2009;39(3):235–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Côté J, Baker J, Abernethy B. Practice and play in the development of sport expertise. In: Tenebaum G, Eklund R, editors. Handbook of sport psychology, vol. 3. New York: Wiley; 2007. p. 184–202.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cumming G, Garand T, Borysyk L. Correlation of performance in track and field events with bone age. J Pediatr. 1972;80(6):970–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: a general overview. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15(11):988–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ericsson KA, Krampe RT, Tesch-Römer C. The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychol Rev. 1993;100:363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ford PR, Ward P, Hodges NJ, Williams AM. The role of deliberate practice and play in career progression in sport: the early engagement hypothesis. High Ability Stud. 2009;20(1):65–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Frisch RE, Gotz-Welbergen AV, McArthur JW, Albright T, Witschi J, Bullen B, Birnholz J, Reed RB, Hermann H. Delayed menarche and amenorrhea of college athletes in relation to age of onset of training. J Am Med Assoc. 1981;246(14):1559–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ginsburg RD, Smith SR, Danforth N, Ceranoglu TA, Durant SA, Kamin H, Babcock R, Robin L, Masek B. Patterns of specialization in professional baseball players. J Clin Sport Psychol. 2014;8(3):261–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Grund M, Ritzdorf W. From talent to elite athlete: a study of the performance development of the finalists at the 1999 IAAF World Youth Athletics Championships. New Stud Athl. 2006;21(2):43.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gulbin J, Weissensteiner J, Oldenziel K, Gagné F. Patterns of performance development in elite athletes. Eur J Sport Sci. 2013;13(6):605–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hata E, Aoki K. Age at menarche and selected menstrual characteristics in young Japanese athletes. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1990;61(2):178–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hirose N. Relationships among birth-month distribution, skeletal age and anthropometric characteristics in adolescent elite soccer players. J Sports Sci. 2009;27:1159–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hollings S. World junior success is a prerequisite for world senior success. Mod Athl Coach. 2006;44(1):14–7.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hollings S, Hopkins W, Hume P. Age at peak performance of successful track and field athletes. Int J Sports Sci Coach. 2014;9(4):651–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hollings S, Hume P. Is success at the World Junior Athletics Championships a prerequisite for success at World Senior Championships or Olympic Games? Prospective and retrospective analyses. New Stud Athl. 2010;25(2):65–77.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hollings S, Mallett C, Hume P. The transition from elite junior track-and-field athlete to successful senior athlete: why some do, why others don’t. Int J Sports Sci Coach. 2014;9(3):457–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Julin A. Where have all the flowers gone. In: Matthews P, editor. Athletics. Surbiton: SportsBooks Ltd; 1995. p. 140–2.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Macnamara BN, Hambrick DZ, Oswald FL. Deliberate practice and performance in music, games, sports, education, and professions a meta-analysis. Psychol Sci. 2014;25:1608–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Malina RM. Delayed age of menarche of athletes. J Am Med Assoc. 1982;247(24):3312.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Malina RM, Beunen G, Wellens R, Claessens A. Skeletal maturity and body size of teenage Belgian track and field athletes. Ann Hum Biol. 1986;13(4):331–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Malina RM, Katzmarzyk PT, Bonci CM, Ryan RC, Wellens RE. Family size and age at menarche in athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997;29(1):99–106.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Malina RM, Rogol AD, Cumming SP, Silva MJCE, Figueiredo AJ. Biological maturation of youth athletes: assessment and implications. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(13):852–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Malina RM, Spirduso WW, Tate C, Baylor AM. Age at menarche and selected menstrual characteristics in athletes at different competitive levels and in different sports. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1977;10(3):218–22.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Moesch K, Elbe AM, Hauge ML, Wikman J. Late specialization: the key to success in centimeters, grams, or seconds (cgs) sports. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011;21(6):e282–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mostafavifar AM, Best TM, Myer GD. Early sport specialisation, does it lead to long-term problems? Br J Sports Med. 2013;47(17):1060–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Musch J, Grondin S. Unequal competition as an impediment to personal development: a review of the relative age effect in sport. Dev Rev. 2001;21:147–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Oldenziel K, Gagne F, Gulbin J. Factors affecting the rate of athlete development from novice to senior elite: how applicable is the 10-year rule. In: Athens pre-Olympic congress; 2004. Retrieved Oct. http://cev.org.br/biblioteca/factors-affecting-the-rate-of-athlete-development-from-novice-to-senior-elite-how-applicable-is-the-10-year-rule/.

  34. Piacentini MF, Comotto S, Guerriero A, Bonato M, Vernillo G, La Torre A. Does the junior IAAF athletic world championship represent a springboard for the success in the throwing events? A retrospective study. J Sports Med Phys Fitn. 2014;54:410–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Raschner C, Muller L, Hildebrandt C. The role of a relative age effect in the first winter Youth Olympic Games in 2012. Br J Sports Med. 2012;46(15):1038–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Scholz W. The throwing events at the IAAF World Junior Championships: a whistle stop on the journey to elite athletics. New Stud Athl. 2006;21(2):7.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Stager JM, Robertshaw D, Miescher E. Delayed menarche in swimmers in relation to age at onset of training and athletic performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1984;16(6):550–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Stambulova N, Alfermann D, Cote J, Statler T. Career development and transitions of athletes. In: 12th European congress of sport psychology. FEPSAC European Federation of Sport Psychology; 2007.

  39. Suslov F. Current problems in the development of young athletes. New Stud Athl. 2008;23(3):19–25.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zelichenok V. The long-term competition activity of the world’s top athletes. New Stud Athl. 2005;20(2):19–24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JLF and RFC: significant manuscript writer. Significant manuscript reviewer/reviser. Concept and design. Data acquisition. Data analysis and interpretation. Statistical expertise. JAS: significant manuscript writer. Significant manuscript reviewer/reviser. Concept and design. Statistical expertise.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert F. Chapman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Foss, J.L., Sinex, J.A. & Chapman, R.F. Career Performance Progressions of Junior and Senior Elite Track and Field Athletes. J. of SCI. IN SPORT AND EXERCISE 1, 168–175 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42978-019-0013-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42978-019-0013-8

Keywords

Navigation