Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Benthic invertebrate communities structure in headwater streams with different states of the riparian vegetation conservation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Community Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many studies assess the impact of anthropogenic activities in water bodies using methods that focus on physical, chemical and microbiological characteristics of water. The use of benthic invertebrates as tools for biomonitoring protocols helps the understanding of those impacts, when these modifications cannot be explained only by the water characteristics. We analyzed the environmental characteristics and invertebrate fauna structure in an 80 m extension of streams located in four micro-basins. This reach-scale analysis included streams of three riparian vegetation conservation states: preserved in both riverbanks (forested), removed in both riverbanks for pasture (pasture), and one riverbank with riparian vegetation and another with pasture (intermediate). The environmental data analysis indicated a clear separation between the forested and pasture streams, emphasizing the interaction of the state of riparian vegetation’s preservation with some habitat characteristics, such as width, substrate type and shelter for the fauna. Our initial hypothesis about the benthic invertebrates’ structure was to find in streams with conserved riparian vegetation a benthic fauna composed mainly by groups more specialized and dependent on coarse substrate and plant material imported from the forest and used as shelter and food resource. This hypothesis was confirmed, with higher abundance of groups sensitive to pollution, such as Plecoptera and Trichoptera, mainly in preserved streams. However, when analyzed together the environmental characteristics and the OTUs that best explained the land uses’ differences (RDA analysis), in two micro-basins there was more fauna’s similarity between intermediate and pasture profiles, and in the other two the three profiles differed from each other. These differences may be related not only to reach-scale physical characteristics, but also to catchment-scale attributes of each micro-basin, as the invertebrate distribution and abundance are influenced by a variety of physical/biological factors at different scales. Thus, the study of the possible influence of riparian vegetation conservation states on habitat characteristics and benthic invertebrate structure seems to be dependent on the spatial scale analyzed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

EPT:

Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera orders

NMDS:

Non-metric multidimensional scaling

OTUs:

Operational taxonomic units

PCA:

Principal components analysis

PERMANOVA:

Permutation multivariate analysis of variance

PERMDISP:

Permutation analysis of multivariate dispersions

RDA:

Redundancy analysis

References

  • Allan, J. D. (2004). Landscapes and riverscapes: The influence of land use on stream ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics,35, 257–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M. J., Gorley, R. N., & Clarke, K. R. (2008). PERMANOVA + for PRIMER: Guide to software and statistical methods. Plymouth.

  • Barbour, M. T., Gerritsen, J., Snyder, B. D., & Stribling, J. B. (1999). Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: Periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates and fish (2nd ed.). Washington, D.C.: EPA 841-B-99-002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. F., Baptista, D. F., Nessimian, J. L., & Egler, M. (2004). Substrate specificity, environmental degradation and disturbance structuring macroinvertebrate assemblages in neotropical streams. Hydrobiologia,518, 179–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. F., & Salles, F. F. (2007). Using Baetidae species as biological indicators of environmental degradation in a Brazilian River Basin. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,130, 365–372.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Callisto, M., Ferreira, W. R., Moreno, P., Goulart, M., & Petrucio, M. (2002). Aplicação de um protocolo de avaliação rápida da diversidade de habitats em atividades de ensino e pesquisa (MG-RJ). Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia,14(1), 91–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, N. M., Pearson, R. G., & Pearson, B. A. (2016). Riparian vegetation and sediment gradients determine invertebrate diversity in streams draining an agricultural landscape. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment,221, 163–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbi, J. J., Kleine, P., & Trivinho-Strixino, S. (2013). Are aquatic insect species sensitive to banana plant cultivation? Ecological Indicators,25, 156–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbi, J. J., & Trivinho-Strixino, S. (2008). Relationship between sugar cane cultivation and stream macroinvertebrate communities. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology,51(4), 769–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domínguez, E., & Fernández, H. R. (2009). Macroinvertebrados bentónicos sudamericanos—Sistemática y biología. Tucumán: Fundación Miguel Lillo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, W. R., Ligeiro, R., Macedo, D. R., Hughes, R. M., Kaufmann, P. R., Oliveira, L. G., et al. (2014). Importance of environmental factors for the richness and distribution of benthic macroinvertebrates in tropical headwater streams. Freshwater Science,33(3), 860–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fundação Florestal. (2011). Plano de manejo da APA Corumbataí, Botucatu e Tejupá—Perímetro Botucatu. Fundação para a Conservação e a Produção Florestal do Estado de São Paulo. Volume 1. Diagnóstico, São Paulo.

  • Goulart, M., & Callisto, M. (2005). Mayfly diversity in the Brazilian tropical headwaters of Serra do Cipó. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology,48(6), 983–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulart, M. D., & Callisto, M. (2003). Bioindicadores de qualidade de água como ferramenta em estudos de impacto ambiental. Revista da FAPAM,2(1), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henriques-Oliveira, A. L., Nessimian, J. L., & Dorvillé, L. F. M. (2003). Feeding habits of chironomid larvae (Insecta: Diptera) from a stream in the Floresta da Tijuca, Rio de Janeiro. Brazilian Journal of Biology,63(2), 269–281.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hepp, L. U., & Santos, S. (2009). Benthic communities of streams related to different land uses in a hydrographic basin in southern Brazil. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,157, 305–318.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iñiguez-Anmijos, C., Hampel, H., & Breuer, L. (2018). Land-use effects on structural and functional composition of benthic and leaf-associated macroinvertebrates in four Andean streams. Aquatic Ecology,52, 77–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, P. R., Levine, P., Robison, E. G., Seeliger, C., & Peck, D. V. (1999). Quantifying physical habitat in wadeable streams. Washington: EPA/620/R-99/003. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

  • Krynak, E. M., & Yates, A. G. (2018). Benthic invertebrate taxonomic and trait associations with land use in an intensively managed watershed: Implications for indicator identification. Ecological Indicators,93, 1050–1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlmann, M. L., Johnscher-Fornasaro, G., Ogura, L. L., & Imbimbo, H. R. V. (2012). Protocolo para o biomonitoramento com as comunidades bentônicas de rios e reservatórios do estado de São Paulo. São Paulo: CETESB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lammert, M., & Allan, J. D. (1999). Assessing biotic integrity of streams: Effects of scale in measuring the influence of land use/cover and habitat structure on fish and macroinvertebrates. Environmental Management,23(2), 257–270.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lenat, D. R., & Crawford, J. K. (1994). Effects of land use on water quality and aquatic biota of three North Carolina Piedmont streams. Hydrobiologia,294, 185–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopretto, E. C., & Tell, G. (1995). Ecossistemas de aguas continentales: metodologias para su studio. Argentina: Tomo III. Ed. Sur.

  • Macedo, D. R., Hughes, R. M., Ligeiro, R., Ferreira, W. R., Castro, M. A., Junqueira, N. T., et al. (2014). The relative influence of catchment and site variables on fish and macroinvertebrate richness in cerrado biome streams. Landscape Ecology,29, 1001–1016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mello, K., Valente, R. A., Randhir, T. O., Santos, A. C. A., & Vettorazzi, C. A. (2018). Effects of land use and land cover on water quality of low-order streams in Southeastern Brazil: Watershed versus riparian zone. CATENA,167, 130–138.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Merritt, R. W., & Cummins, K. W. (1996). An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America (3a ed.). Dubuque: Kendall & Hunt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minshall, G. W., & Minshall, J. N. (1977). Microdistribution of benthic invertebrates in a Rocky Mountain (U.S.A.) stream. Hydrobiologia,55, 231–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moraes, A. B., Wilhelm, A. E., Boelter, T., Stenert, C., Schulz, U. H., & Maltchik, L. (2014). Reduced riparian zone width compromises aquatic macroinvertebrate communities in streams of Southern Brazil. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,186, 7063–7074.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mugnai, R., Nessimian, J. L., & Baptista, D. F. (2010). Manual de identificação de macroinvertebrados aquáticos do Estado do Rio de Janeiro: Para atividades técnicas, de ensino e treinamento em programas de avaliação da qualidade ecológica dos ecossistemas lóticos. Rio de Janeiro: Technical Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naiman, R. J., Décamps, H., & McClain, M. E. (2005). Riparia. Ecology, conservation, and management of streamside communities. London: Elsevier Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nessimian, J. L., Venticinque, E. M., Zuanon, J., Marco, P. D., Jr., Gordo, M., Fidelis, L., et al. (2008). Land use, habitat integrity, and aquatic insect assemblages in Central Amazonian streams. Hydrobiologia,614, 117–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen, J., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., O´Hara, B., Simpson, G. L., Solymos, P., Stevens, M. H. H., & Wagner, H. (2013). Vegan: Community ecology package. Version 2.4-3. Viena: R Project for Statistical Computing.

  • Pearson, R. G., Connolly, N., Benson, L. J., Cairns, A., Clayton, P., Crossland, M., et al. (2019). Invertebrate responses to land use in tropical streams: Discrimination of impacts enhanced by analysis of discrete areas. Marine & Freshwater Research,70, 563–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. M., Cooper, A. B., Davies-Colley, R. J., Rutherford, J. C., & Williamson, R. B. (1997). Land use effects on habitat, water quality, periphyton, and benthic invertebrates in Waikato, New Zealand, hill-country streams. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research,31, 579–597.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Austria: R Development Core Team.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, C., Haro, R. J., Johnson, L. B., & Host, G. E. (1997). Catchment and reach-scale properties as indicators of macroinvertebrate species traits. Freshwater Biology,37, 219–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roque, F. O., Trivinho-Strixino, S., Strixino, G., Agostinho, R. C., & Fogo, J. C. (2003). Benthic macroinvertebrates in streams of the Jaragua State Park (Southeast of Brazil) considering multiple spatial scales. Journal of Insect Conservation,7, 63–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, D. M., & Resh, V. H. (1993). Introduction to freshwater biomonitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates. In D. M. Rosenberg & V. H. Resh (Eds.), Freshwater biomonitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates (pp. 1–9). New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepp, D. L., & Cummins, J. D. (1997). Restoration in an urban watershed: Anacostia River of Maryland and the District of Columbia. In J. E. Williams, C. A. Wood, & M. P. Dombeck (Eds.), Watershed restoration: principles and practices (pp. 297–317). Bethesda: American Fisheries Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegloch, A. E., Froehlich, C. G., & Kotzian, C. B. (2008). Composition and diversity of Ephemeroptera (Insecta) nymph communities in the middle section of the Jacuí River and some tributaries, southern Brazil. Iheringia, Série Zoologia,98(4), 425–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegloch, A. M., Suriano, M., Spies, M., & Fonseca-Gessner, A. (2014). Effect of land use on mayfly assemblages structure in Neotropical headwater streams. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências,86(4), 1735–1747.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, M. O., Souza, A. L. T., Moschini, L. E., & Oliveira, A. K. (2016). Influence of watershed land use and riparian characteristics on biological indicators of stream water quality in southeastern Brazil. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment,2016, 333–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivinho-Strixino, S. (2011). Larvas de Chironomidae: Guia de identificação. São Carlos: Laboratório de Entomologia Aquática¸Universidade Federal de São Carlos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivinho-Strixino, S., & Strixino, G. (2005). Chironomidae (Diptera) do Rio Ribeira (divisa dos estados de São Paulo e Paraná) numa avaliação ambiental faunística. Entomologia y Vectores,12(2), 243–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vieira, L. J. S., Rosin, G. C., Takeda, A. M., Lopes, M. R. M., & Sousa, D. S. (2012). Studies in South-Occidental Amazon: contribution to the knowledge of Brazilian Chironomidae (Insecta: Diptera). Acta Scientiarum: Biological Sciences,34(2), 149–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., Lyons, J., Kanehl, P., & Gatti, R. (1997). Influences of watershed land use on habitat quality and biotic integrity in Wisconsin streams. Fisheries,22(6), 6–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, J. R., Gurtz, M. E., Mains, J. J., Meyer, J. L., Swank, W. T., Waide, J. B., et al. (1983). Stability of stream ecosystems. In J. B. Barnes & G. W. Minshall (Eds.), Stream ecology. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshida, C. E., & Uieda, V. S. (2013). Índices bióticos mono e multimétricos de avaliação da qualidade da água em riachos de Mata Atlântica. Bioikos,27(2), 79–88.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank H.A. Rodrigues, S.C. de Almeida and all colleagues from the Laboratory of Lotic Habitats Ecology (Department of Zoology, Universidade Estadual Paulista) for the assistance in the field and laboratory work, and P.S. Manoel for the critical reading of the manuscript. This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001, received by the first author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Zoology, Institute of Bioscience, UNESP - Univ Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, SP, 18.618-689, Brazil

    A. L. U. Melo, E. R. Ono & V. S. Uieda

Authors
  1. A. L. U. Melo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. R. Ono
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. V. S. Uieda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. S. Uieda.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 19 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 76 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Melo, A.L.U., Ono, E.R. & Uieda, V.S. Benthic invertebrate communities structure in headwater streams with different states of the riparian vegetation conservation. COMMUNITY ECOLOGY 21, 43–53 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42974-020-00011-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42974-020-00011-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation