Skip to main content
Log in

On relaxing the distributional assumption of stochastic frontier models

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of the Korean Statistical Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stochastic frontier models have been considered as an alternative to deterministic frontier models in that they attribute the deviation of the output from the production frontier to both measurement error and inefficiency. However, such merit is often dimmed by strong assumptions on the distribution of the measurement error and the inefficiency such as the normal-half normal pair or the normal-exponential pair. Since the distribution of the measurement error is often accepted as being approximately normal, here we show how to estimate various stochastic frontier models with a relaxed assumption on the inefficiency distribution, building on the recent work of Kneip and his coworkers. We illustrate the usefulness of our method with data on Japanese local public hospitals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aigner, D., & Chu, S. (1968). On estimating the industry production function. American Economic Review, 58, 826–839.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aneiros-Pérez, G., González-Manteiga, W., & Vieu, P. (2004). Estimation and testing in a partial linear regression model under long-memory dependence. Bernoulli, 10, 49–78.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bera, A. K., & Sharma, S. C. (1999). Estimating production uncertainty in stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 12, 187–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, J. (1991). On the optimal rates of convergence for nonparametric deconvolution problems. The Annals of Statistics, 19, 1257–1272.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, Y., Li, Q., & Weersink, A. (1996). Semiparametric estimation of stochastic production frontier models. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 14, 460–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P., & Simar, L. (2002). Estimating a changepoint, boundary, or frontier in the presence of observation error. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97, 523–534.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Horrace, W. C., & Parmeter, C. F. (2011). Semiparametric deconvolution with unknown error variance. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 35, 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jondrow, J., Lovell, C. K., Materov, I. S., & Schmidt, P. (1982). On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model. Journal of Econometrics, 19(2), 233–238.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kneip, A., Simar, L., & Van Keilegom, I. (2015). Frontier estimation in the presence of measurement error with unknown variance. Journal of Econometrics, 184, 379–393.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar, S. C., Park, B. U., Simar, L., & Tsionas, E. G. (2007). Nonparametric stochastic frontiers: A local maximum likelihood approach. Journal of Econometrics, 137, 1–27.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, H., Liu, X., Li, R., & Tsai, C.-L. (2010). Estimation and testing for partially linear single-index models. Annals of Statistics, 38, 3811–3836.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Martins-Filho, C., & Yao, F. (2015). Semiparametric stochastic frontier estimation via profile likelihood. Econometric Reviews, 34, 413–451.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Meeusen, W., & van den Broeck, J. (1977). Efficiency estimation from Cobb–Douglas production functions with composed error. International Economic Review, 18, 435–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ondrich, J., & Ruggiero, J. (2001). Efficiency measurement in the stochastic frontier model. European Journal of Operational Research, 129, 434–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parmeter, C. F., & Kumbhakar, S. C. (2014). Efficiency analysis: A primer on recent advances. Foundations and Trends in Econometrics, 7, 191–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parmeter, C. F., Wang, H.-J., & Kumbhakar, S. C. (2017). Nonparametric estimation of the determinants of inefficiency. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 47, 205–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speckman, P. (1988). Kernel smoothing in partial linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 50, 413–436.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Waldman, D. M. (1984). Properties of technical efficiency estimators in the stochastic frontier model. Journal of Econometrics, 25, 353–364.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank two referees for their valuable suggestions, which have significantly improved the paper. Noh’s research was supported by the Basic science research program through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2017R1D1A1A09000804). Van Keilegom’s research was supported by the European Research Council (2016–2021, Horizon 2020/ERC Grant agreement no. 694409).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hohsuk Noh.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (pdf 60 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Noh, H., Van Keilegom, I. On relaxing the distributional assumption of stochastic frontier models. J. Korean Stat. Soc. 49, 1–14 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42952-019-00011-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42952-019-00011-1

Keywords

Navigation