Skip to main content
Log in

Acid treatment enhances performance of beads activated carbon for formaldehyde removal

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Carbon Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study evaluated how acid treatment affects the ability of customized beads of activated carbon (BAC) to remove formaldehyde from air. Two different acids (hydrofluoric acid and sulfuric acid) were used to modify the surface of BAC prepared from a polymer material. The acid-modified BACs were further subjected to heat treatment. Physical and chemical characteristics of modified and unmodified BACs were investigated using nitrogen adsorption, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, X-ray fluorescence, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Formaldehyde removal was evaluated under both dry and moist conditions. From the results, acid treatment clearly improved the adsorption performance, especially under the moist condition. Qualitative and quantitative surface analyses were conducted, mainly to examine the amount of O-bonds after acid treatment and the formation of S–O or Cl–O on BAC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability statement

The Data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

References

  1. Duong A, Steinmaus C, McHale CM, Vaughan CP, Zhang L (2011) Reproductive and developmental toxicity of formaldehyde: a systematic review. Mutat Res 728(3):118–138

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Andersen ME, Gentry PR, Swenberg JA, Mundt KA, White KW, Thompson C, Bus J, Sherman JH, Greim H, Bolt H, Marsh GM, Chechkoway H, Coggon D, Clewell HJ III (2019) Considerations for refining the risk assessment process for formaldehyde: results from an interdisciplinary workshop. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 106:210–223

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blair A, Saracci R, Stewart PA, Hayes RB, Shy C (1990) Epidemiologic evidence on the relationship between formaldehyde exposure and cancer. Scand J Work Environ Health 16(3):381–393

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee CY, Chiang CM, Wang YH, Ma RH (2007) A self-heating gas sensor with integrated NiO thin-film for formaldehyde detection. Sens Actuators, B Chem 122(2):503–510

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gilbert NL, Guay M, Gauvin D, Dietz RN, Chan CC, Lévesque B (2008) Air change rate and concentration of formaldehyde in residential indoor air. Atmos Environ 42(10):2424–2428

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Costa S, Costa C, Madureira J, Valdiglesias V, Teixeira-Gomes A, de Pinho PG, Laffon B, Teixeira JP (2019) Occupational exposure to formaldehyde and early biomarkers of cancer risk, immunotoxicity and susceptibility. Environ Res 179:108740

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Leso V, Macrini MC, Russo F, Iavicoli I (2022) Formaldehyde exposure and epigenetic effects: a systematic review. Appl Sci 10(7):2319

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kulle TJ, Sauder LR, Hebel JR, Green DJ, Chatham MD (1987) Formaldehyde dose-response in healthy nonsmokers. Japca. 37(8):919–924

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Castro-Hurtado I, Mandayo GG, Castaño E (2011) Thickness influence on gas sensing characteristics of NiO thin films for formaldehyde detection. In: Proceedings of the 8th Spanish Conference on Electron Devices CDE’. pp 1–4

  10. Wan Y, Fan X, Zhu T (2011) Removal of low-concentration formaldehyde in air by DC corona discharge plasma. Chem Eng J 171(1):314–319

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Li C, Shen Y, Jia M, Sheng S, Adebajo MO, Zhu H (2008) Catalytic combustion of formaldehyde on gold/iron-oxide catalysts. Catal Commun 9(3):355–361

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen D, Qu Z, Shen S, Li X, Shi Y, Wang Y, Fu Q, Wu J (2011) Comparative studies of silver based catalysts supported on different supports for the oxidation of formaldehyde. Catal Today 175(1):338–345

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Quiroz Torres J, Royer S, Bellat JP, Giraudon JM, Lamonier JF (2013) Formaldehyde: catalytic oxidation as a promising soft way of elimination. Chemsuschem 6(4):578–592

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ryu DY, Kim DW, Kang YJ, Lee Y, Nakabayashi K, Miyawaki J, Park JI, Yoon SH (2022) Preparation of environmental-friendly N-rich chitin-derived activated carbon for the removal of formaldehyde. Carbon Lett. 32:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lee H, Park RS, Lee HW, Hong Y, Lee Y, Park SH, Jung SC, Yoo KS, Jeon JK, Park YK (2016) Adsorptive removal of atmospheric pollutants over Pyropia tenera chars. Carbon letters 19:79–88

    Google Scholar 

  16. Moon HS, Kim IS, Kang SJ, Ryu SK (2014) Adsorption of volatile organic compounds using activated carbon fiber filter in the automobiles. Carbon letters 15(3):203–209

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kang YJ, Jo HK, Jang MH, Ma X, Jeon Y, Oh K, Park JI (2022) A brief review of formaldehyde removal through activated carbon adsorption. Appl Sci 12(10):5025

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Choi SS, Lee JH, Jin YM, Lee SH (2019) Adsorption characteristics of volatile organic compounds onto lyocell-based activated carbon fibers. Carbon Letters 29(6):633–642

    Google Scholar 

  19. Azhagapillai P, Al Shoaibi A, Chandrasekar S (2021) Surface functionalization methodologies on activated carbons and their benzene adsorption. Carbon Letters 31(3):419–426

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang L, Peng Y, Zhang J, Chen L, Meng X, Xiao FS (2016) Adsorptive and catalytic properties in the removal of volatile organic compounds over zeolite-based materials. Chin J Catal 37(6):800–809

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Agarwal M, Dave M, Upadhayaya S (2011) Adsorption of formaldehyde on treated activated carbon and activated alumina. Curr World Environ 6(1):53–59

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Srisuda S, Virote B (2008) Adsorption of formaldehyde vapor by amine-functionalized mesoporous silica materials. J Environ Sci 20(3):379–384

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Son BC, Park CH, Kim CS (2020) Fabrication of antimicrobial nanofiber air filter using activated carbon and cinnamon essential oil. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 20(7):4376–4380

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wee JH, Bae Y, Ahn H, Choi YO, Jeong E, Yeo SY (2022) Fibrous and granular activated carbon mixed media for effective gas removal as a cabin air filter. Carbon Lett. 32:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  25. Liu M, Xiao C (2018) Research progress on modification of activated carbon. E3S Web Conf. 38:02005

    Google Scholar 

  26. de Falco G, Li W, Cimino S, Bandosz TJ (2018) Role of sulfur and nitrogen surface groups in adsorption of formaldehyde on nanoporous carbons. Carbon 138:283–291

    Google Scholar 

  27. An HB, Yu MJ, Kim JM, Jin M, Jeon JK, Park SH, Kim SS, Park YK (2012) Indoor formaldehyde removal over CMK-3. Nanoscale Res Lett 7(1):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zhou P, Zhu X, Yu J, Xiao W (2013) Effects of adsorbed F, OH, and Cl ions on formaldehyde adsorption performance and mechanism of anatase TiO2 nanosheets with exposed 001 facets. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5(16):8165–8172

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Caturla F, Molina-Sabio M, Rodriguez-Reinoso F (1991) Preparation of activated carbon by chemical activation with ZnCl2. Carbon 29(7):999–1007

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee KJ, Miyawaki J, Shiratori N, Yoon SH, Jang J (2013) Toward an effective adsorbent for polar pollutants: formaldehyde adsorption by activated carbon. J Hazard Mater 260:82–88

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Netala VR, Kotakadi VS, Nagam V, Bobbu P, Ghosh SB, Tartte V (2015) First report of biomimetic synthesis of silver nanoparticles using aqueous callus extract of Centella asiatica and their antimicrobial activity. Appl Nanosci 5(7):801–807

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Karnati SR, Høgsaa B, Zhang L, Fini EH (2020) Developing carbon nanoparticles with tunable morphology and surface chemistry for use in construction. Constr Build Mater 262:120780

    Google Scholar 

  33. Masoudian N, Rajabi M, Ghaedi M (2019) Titanium oxide nanoparticles loaded onto activated carbon prepared from bio-waste watermelon rind for the efficient ultrasonic-assisted adsorption of congo red and phenol red dyes from wastewaters. Polyhedron 173:114105

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Juan Y, Ke-Qiang Q (2009) Preparation of activated carbon by chemical activation under vacuum. Environ Sci Technol 43(9):3385–3390

    Google Scholar 

  35. Li L, Liu S, Liu J (2011) Surface modification of coconut shell based activated carbon for the improvement of hydrophobic VOC removal. J Hazard Mater 192(2):683–690

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Przepiórski J (2006) Enhanced adsorption of phenol from water by ammonia-treated activated carbon. J Hazard Mater 135(1–3):453–456

    Google Scholar 

  37. Barroso-Bogeat A, Alexandre-Franco M, Fernández-González C, Gómez-Serrano V (2014) FT-IR analysis of pyrone and chromene structures in activated carbon. Energy Fuels 28(6):4096–4103

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Choi CH, Park SH, Woo SI (2012) Binary and ternary doping of nitrogen, boron, and phosphorus into carbon for enhancing electrochemical oxygen reduction activity. ACS Nano 6(8):7084–7091

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Ma X, Li L, Chen R, Wang C, Zhou K, Li H (2018) Porous carbon materials based on biomass for acetone adsorption: effect of surface chemistry and porous structure. Appl Surf Sci 459:657–664

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang J, Krishna R, Yang J, Dandamudi KPR, Deng S (2015) Nitrogen-doped porous carbons for highly selective CO2 capture from flue gases and natural gas upgrading. Mater Today Commun 4:156–165

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Sevilla M, Fuertes AB (2006) Catalytic graphitization of templated mesoporous carbons. Carbon 44(3):468–474

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Sevilla M, Fuertes AB (2013) Fabrication of porous carbon monoliths with a graphitic framework. Carbon 56:155–166

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Guo Y, Zeng Z, Zhu Y, Huang Z, Cui Y, Yang J (2018) Catalytic oxidation of aqueous organic contaminants by persulfate activated with sulfur-doped hierarchically porous carbon derived from thiophene. Appl Catal B 220:635–644

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Niki H, Maker PD, Breitenbach LP, Savage CM (1978) FTIR studies of the kinetics and mechanism for the reaction of Cl atom with formaldehyde. Chem Phys Lett 57(4):596–599

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Seredych M, Łoś S, Giannakoudakis DA, Rodríguez-Castellón E, Bandosz TJ (2016) Photoactivity of g-C3N4/S-doped porous carbon composite: synergistic effect of composite formation. Chemsuschem 9(8):795–799

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Xu Z, Tian D, Sun Z, Zhang D, Zhou Y, Chen W, Deng H (2019) Highly porous activated carbon synthesized by pyrolysis of polyester fabric wastes with different iron salts: pore development and adsorption behavior. Colloids Surf, A 565:180–187

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Hu P, Duan Y, Ding W, Zhang J, Bai L, Li N, Wei H (2017) Enhancement of mercury removal efficiency by activated carbon treated with nonthermal plasma in different atmospheres. Energy Fuels 31(12):13852–13858

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Tolbert MA, Pfaff J, Jayaweera I, Prather MJ (1993) Uptake of formaldehyde by sulfuric acid solutions: impact on stratospheric ozone. J Geophys Res Atmos 98(D2):2957–2962

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Kwon DW, Seo PW, Kim GJ, Hong SC (2015) Characteristics of the HCHO oxidation reaction over Pt/TiO2 catalysts at room temperature: the effect of relative humidity on catalytic activity. Appl Catal B 163:436–443

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Wang Z, Pei J, Zhang JS (2012) Modeling and simulation of an activated carbon-based botanical air filtration system for improving indoor air quality. Build Environ 54:109–115

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by Korea Environment Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI) through the Prospective Green Technology Innovation Project, funded by Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE) (2020003160004).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Kyeongseok Oh or Joo-Il Park.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

TThe authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kang, YJ., Jo, HK., Jang, MH. et al. Acid treatment enhances performance of beads activated carbon for formaldehyde removal. Carbon Lett. 33, 397–408 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-022-00428-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42823-022-00428-5

Keywords

Navigation