Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Grinding and Flotation Optimization Using Operational Intelligence

  • Published:
Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, metal-producing companies have increased their investment in automation and technological innovation, embracing new opportunities to enable transformational change. Transformation to a digital plant can fundamentally revolutionize how industrial complexes operate. The abundant and growing quantity of real-time data and events collected in the grinding and flotation circuits in a mineral processing plant can be used to solve operational issues and optimize plant performance. A grade recovery model is used to identify the best operating conditions in real time. The strategy for increasing the value of instrumentation in current plants is reviewed. An optimal Gaudin size distribution model provides augmented information from traditional sensors to find the optimal grind cut size to reduce metal losses in the flotation circuits. Sensors in flotation circuits enable an estimate of the recovery and determination of the optimal froth depth and aeration using an air hold up flotation model. A strategy of classifying data for on-line generation of insights to using operational intelligence tools is described. The implementation of a recovery/grind strategy with industrial examples in non-ferrous mineral processing is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wills BA, Finch JA (2016) Mineral processing technology, 8th edn. Elsevier Ltd.

  2. Bascur OA (1990) Profit-Based grinding controls, minerals and metallurgical processing, February, SME, CO., pp 9–15

  3. Plourde M, Bascur OA, Paquet S, Gervais D (2017) Digital innovation in modern engineering and operational excellence. Presented at the 2017 SME Annual Conference and Expo, Denver, February 19–22.

  4. Steyn J, Bascur OA, Gorain B (2018) Metallurgy analytics, transforming plant data into actionable insights, mining engineering, SME, CO.

  5. Bascur OA, Benavides N (2013) Improving flotation grade recovery using operational data at Southern Peru Copper Cuajone, Flotation 2013, Mineral Engineering Conference, Cape Town, South Africa, Nov.

  6. Bascur OA (2016) A journey towards a digital transformation in the process industries draft. https://pisquare.osisoft.com/docs/DOC-2935-journeydigitaltransformation-draft-c1-4-binder1pdf

  7. Bascur OA (2018) TechCon lab a digital plant template, PI world 2018, https://pisquare.osisoft.com/videos/2503-osisoft-hands-on-lab-a-digital-plant-template-for-operational-insights-an-enterprise-strategy

  8. Bascur OA (2019) Process control and operational intelligence in mineral and metallurgical processing. In: Chapter 10.3., SME Handbook, Englewood, CO.

  9. Goldratt EM (1984) The goal – a process of on going improvement – theory of constraints. The North River Press Publishing Company, Great Barrington

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bascur OA (2013) A dynamic flotation framework for performance management. In: Young C, Luttrel G (eds) Separation technologies for minerals, coal and earth resources, SME , Englewood, CO.

  11. Copper, A., 2018, Personal communication.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ericson G, Martens J, Rohm WA. What is Azure Machine Learning Studio?, Microsoft Azure., https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/machine-learning/studio/what-is-ml-studio

  13. Bascur OA (2011) A flotation model framework for dynamic performance management, in Procemin 2011. In: Kuyvenhoven R (ed) Gecamin, Santiago, Chile

  14. Kelleher JD, Namee BM, D’Arcy A (2015) Fundamentals of Machine Learning For Predictive Analytics. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Raschka S (2015) Python machine learning. Packt Publishing, Birmingham

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support of OSIsoft to publish this technical paper and the participation of many people that have contributed in this over the years.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. OSIsoft, LLC, Katy Freeway, Suite 1200, Houston, TX, 77079, USA

    O. A. Bascur & A. Soudek

Authors
  1. O. A. Bascur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Soudek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. A. Bascur.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bascur, O.A., Soudek, A. Grinding and Flotation Optimization Using Operational Intelligence. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration 36, 139–149 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-018-0036-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-018-0036-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation