Skip to main content
Log in

Study of the formation and dynamic characteristics of the vortex in the pump sump by CFD and experiment

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Hydrodynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The formation mechanism and the dynamic characteristics of the floor-attached vortex (FAV) in the pump sump are analyzed, with the velocity gradient as the key factor. The FAV is shown to be formed when the velocity gradient in the singular point area reaches a certain strength. The evolution of the FAV is accompanied by the energy accumulation and dissipation in the vortex area. The generated FAV is in the form of the vortex pair at the initial stage, with opposite directions of rotation. The vortex with the same rotating direction as the impeller is strong because the rotational kinetic energy is easy to accumulate. The circumferential velocity of the FAV first increases and then decreases with the radius of the vortex core, indicating the FAV is a kind of forced vortex. The radius with the largest velocity gradient is the radius of the vortex core.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Norizan R. E., Harun Z. Enhancement of vorticity reduction by floor splitter in pump sump to improve pump efficiency [J]. Sustainable energy technologies and assessments, 2018, 26: 28–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ansar M., Tatsuaki N., George C. Numerical simulations of inviscid three-dimensional flows at single- and dualpump intakes [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2002, 40(4): 461–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dong X., Dong G., Liu C. Study on vorticity structures in late flow transition [J]. Physics of Fluids, 2018, 30(10): 104108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nahale S., Reza M., Michel J. C. Investigation of rotating vortex rope formation during load variation in a francis turbine draft tube [J]. Renewable Energy, 2020, 151: 238–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Constantinescu G. S., Patel V. C. Numerical model for simulation of pump-intake flow and vortices [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, 1998, 124(2): 123–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Monshizadeh M., Tahershamsi, A., Rahimzadeh D. Comparison between hydraulic and structural based anti-vortex methods at intakes [J]. The European Physical Journal Plus, 2017, 132(2): 291–302.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gupta R., Kaulaskar M. D., Kumar V. Studies on the understanding mechanism of air core and vortex formation in a hydro-cyclone [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2008, 144(2): 153–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hite J. E., Mih W. C. Velocity of air-core vortices at hydraulic intakes [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, 1994, 120(3): 284–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rajendran V. P., Patel V. C. Measurement of vortices in model pump-intake bay by PIV [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, ASCE, 2000, 126(5): 322–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Duinmeijera S. P., Moreno R. A., Antonio M. A simple measuring set-up for the experimental determination of the dynamics of a large particle in the 3D velocity field around a free surface vortex [J]. Flow measurement and Instrumentation, 2019, 65: 52–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Amiri S. M., Zarrati A. R., Roshan R. Surface vortex prevention at power intakes by horizontal plates [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Water Management, 2011, 164(4): 193–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu C., Liang H., Jin Y. PIV Measurements of intake flow field in axial-flow pump [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2015, 46(8): 33–41.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Song X., Liu C. Experimental study of the floor-attached vortices in pump sump using V3V [J]. Renewable Energy, 2021, 164: 752–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Song X., Liu C. Experimental investigation of floor-attached vortex effects on the pressure pulsation at the bottom of the axial flow pump sump [J]. Renewable Energy, 2020, 145: 2327–2336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yoshinobu Y., Chisachi K., Takahide N. et al. Suction vortices in a pump sump-Their origin, formation and dynamics [J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2020, 142(3): 031110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Peng X. X., Xu L. H., Liu Y. W. et al. Experimental measurement of tip vortex flow field with/without cavitation in an elliptic hydrofoil [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2017, 29(6): 939–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang W., Zhu B., Wang Y. et al. Numerical simulation of condensation shock in partial cavitating flow on a hydrofoil [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2018, 30(1): 183–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jong W. C., Young D. C., Chang G. K. Flow uniformity in a multi-intake pump sump model [J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2010, 24(7): 1389–1400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhao W. G., Pan X. W., Song Q. C. et al. Effect of blade perforation near inlet edge on the cavitation performance of centrifugal pump [J]. Journal of Drainage and Irrigation Machinery Engineering, 2019, 37(6): 461–468.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Long N. I., Shin B. R., Douw D. H. Study on surface vortices in pump sump [J]. Journal of Fluid Machinery, 2012, 15(5): 60–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhu B., Chen H. Analysis of the staggered and fixed cavitation phenomenon observed in centrifugal pumps employing a gap drainage impeller [J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2017, 139(3): 031301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kan K., Chen H., Zheng Y. et al. Transient characteristics during power-off process in a shaft extension tubular pump by using a suitable numerical model [J]. Renewable Energy, 2021, 164: 109–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Škerlavaj A., Škerget L., Ravnik J. Predicting free-surface vortices with single-phase simulations [J]. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 2014, 8(2): 193–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Spalart P. R., Strelets M. K., Travin A. K. et al. Modeling the turbulent vortex wake [J]. Fluid Dynamics, 2001, 36(5): 726–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Smirnov P. E., Menter F. R. Sensitization of the SST turbulence model to rotation and curvature by applying the Spalart-Shur correction term [J]. Journal of Turbomachinery, 2009, 131(4): 041010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kim J., Song S. J. Measurement of temperature effects on cavitation in a turbopump inducer [J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2016, 138(1): 011304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen H. X. Research on turbulent flow within the vortex pump [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. B, 2004, 16(6): 701–707.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nahale S., Reza M., Michel J. C. Investigation of rotating vortex rope formation during load variation in a Francis turbine draft tube [J]. Renewable Energy, 2020, 151: 238–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Xing T. A general framework for verification and validation of large eddy simulations [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2015, 27(2): 163–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Joint open fund of Tsinghua University, Ningxia Yinchuan Water Network Digital Water Control Joint Research Institute (Grant No. sklhse-2021-Iow10), the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions [PAPD].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liu Chao.

Additional information

Projects supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51279173, 51876099).

Biography

Xi-jie Song (1990-), Male, Ph. D.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, Xj., Yao, R., Chao, L. et al. Study of the formation and dynamic characteristics of the vortex in the pump sump by CFD and experiment. J Hydrodyn 33, 1202–1215 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-021-0095-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-021-0095-8

Key words

Navigation