Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical and experimental investigation of three-dimensionality in the dam-break flow against a vertical wall

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Hydrodynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The three-dimensionality extent of the dam break flow over a vertical wall is investigated numerically and experimentally in this paper. The numerical method is based on Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equation that describes the three-dimensional incompressible turbulent flow. The free surface is captured by using the unstructured multi-dimensional interface capturing (UMTHINC) scheme. The equations are discretized on 2-D and 3-D unstructured grids using finite volume method. The numerical simulations are compared with newly conducted experiment with emphasis on the effect of three-dimensionality on both free surface and impact pressure. The comparison between the numerical and experimental results shows good agreement. Furthermore, the results also show that 3-D motion of the flow originates at the moment of impact at the lower corners of the impact wall and propagates to the inner region as time advances. The origin of the three-dimensionality is found to be the turbulence development as well as the relative velocity between the side wall region and the inner region of the wave front at the moment of impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dressler R. F. Comparison of theories and experiments for the hydraulic dam-break wave [J]. International Association of Hydrological Sciences, 1954, 3(38): 319–328.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lauber G., Hager W. H. Experiments to dambreak wave: Horizontal channel [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 1998, 36(3): 291–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Martin J., Moyce W. An experimental study of the collapse of liquid columns on a rigid horizontal plane [J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 1952, 244(882): 312–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Koshizuka S., Oka Y. Moving-particle semi-implicit method for fragmentation of incompressible fluid [J]. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 1996, 123(3): 421–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gomez-Gesteira M., Dalrymple R. A. Using a three-dimensional smoothed particle hydrodynamics method for wave impact on a tall structure [J]. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering, 2004130(2): 63–69.

  6. Hu C., Kashiwagi M. A CIP-based method for numerical simulations of violent free-surface flows [J]. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 2004, 9(4): 143–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hu C., Sueyoshi M. Numerical simulation and experiment on dam break problem [J]. Journal of Marine Science andApplication, 2010, 9(2): 109–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kleefsman K. M. T., Fekken G., Veldman A. E. P. et al. A volume-of-fluid based simulation method for wave impact problems [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2005, 206(1): 363–393.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Lobovsky L., Botia-Vera E., Castellana F. et al. Experimental investigation of dynamic pressure loads during dam break [J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2014, 48: 407–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhou Z. Q., Kat J. O. D., Buchner B. A nonlinear 3D approach to simulate green water dynamics on deck [C]. Seventh International Conference on Numerical Ship Hydrodynamics, Nantes, France, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Park I. R., Kim K. S., Kim J. et al. Numerical investigation of the effects of turbulence intensity on dam-break flows [J]. Ocean Engineering, 2012, 42: 176–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sueyoshi M., Hu C. Experimental technique and particle simulation for large deformation problems of free-surface [C]. Conference Proceedings of Japan Society of Naval Architects and Ocean Engineers, Japan Society of Naval Architects and Ocean Engineers, Tokyo, Japan, 2015, 93–94.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ye Z., Zhao X., Deng Z. Numerical investigation of the gate motion effect on a dam break flow [J]. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 2016, 21(4): 579–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Xiao F., Honma Y., Kono T. A simple algebraic interface capturing scheme using hyperbolic tangent function [J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2005, 48(9): 1023–1040.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Ii S., Sugiyama K., Takeuchi S. et al. An interface capturing method with a continuous function: The THINC method with multi-dimensional reconstruction [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2012, 231(5): 2328–2358.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Xie B., Ii S., Xiao F. An efficient and accurate algebraic interface capturing method for unstructured grids in 2 and 3 dimensions: The THINC method with quadratic surface representation [J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2014, 76(12): 1025–1042.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Ii S., Xie B., Xiao F. An interface capturing method with a continuous function: The THINC method on unstructured triangular and tetrahedral meshes [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2014, 259: 260–269.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Xie B., Jin P., Xiao F. An unstructured-grid numerical model for interfacial multiphase fluids based on multi-moment finite volume formulation and THINC method [J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2017, 89: 375–398.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Deshpande S. S., Anumolu L., Trujillo M. F. Evaluating the performance of the two-phase flow solver interFoam [J]. Computational Science and Discovery, 2012, 5(1): 14016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Launder B. E., Spalding D. B. The numerical computation of turbulent flows [J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1974, 3(2): 269–289.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Moukalled F., Mangani L., Darwish M. The finite volume method in computational fluid dynamics: An advanced introduction with OpenFOAM and Matlab, fluid mechanics and its applications [M]. London, UK: Springer International Publishing, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ferziger J. H., Peric M. Computational methods for fluid dynamics [M]. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ubbink O. Numerical prediction of two fluid systems with sharp interfaces [D]. Doctoral Thesis, London, UK: University of London, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Van Leer B. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. II. Monotonicity and conservation combined in a second-order scheme [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 1974, 14(4): 361–370.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Versteeg H. K., Malalasekera W. An introduction to computational fluid dynamics: The finite volume method [M]. London, UK: Prentice Hall, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Maric T., Marschall H., Bothe D. voFoam-A geometrical volume of fluid algorithm on arbitrary unstructured meshes with local dynamic adaptive mesh refinement using OpenFOAM [J]. Physics, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gottlieb S., Shu C. W. Total variation diminishing Runge-Kutta schemes [J]. Mathematics of Computation, 1998, 67(221): 73–85.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Ritter A., Die Fortpflanzung der Wasserwellen [J]. Zeitschrift Verein Deutscher Ingenieure, 1892, 36(33): 947–954.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Changhong Hu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kamra, M.M., Mohd, N., Liu, C. et al. Numerical and experimental investigation of three-dimensionality in the dam-break flow against a vertical wall. J Hydrodyn 30, 682–693 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-018-0074-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-018-0074-x

Key words

Navigation