Skip to main content
Log in

First-time evaluation and characterization of “Šarišša” mudbrick ceramics and findings by SEM–EDX and XRF: chasing the traces of fire

  • Research
  • Published:
Journal of the Australian Ceramic Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Šarišša is one of the most important cities of Hittite Empire in the range of 16th–twelfth century BCE. The city’s importance comes from being the Empire’s summer palace as well as castle formation is seen around the city which gives the Turkish name “Kuşakli” means “Surrounded-Belted” in English. Šarišša is said to be destroyed by a fire/incendiary or battle and almost all mudbricks were given fire and their initial structures were deformed. The fired form of these ceramics could not be identified due to different degrees of fired ceramics and their identification may also favor the provenance analysis of the region’s soil structure that is suitable for the production of mudbricks. For the analysis of mudbricks, X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis was evaluated first to understand the principal, compound former, and trace oxides to compare with geological soil formation and rock types. By examining XRF, the oxides were characterized for compound formation even for mineral composition. As evaluated, main oxides are SiO2, CaO, Fe2O3, Al2O3, MgO, and K2O; compound former was the volatile SO3 that has the formation possibility of gypsum as Sivas’s most provenance soil type within illite-muscovite type clays. Besides, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDX) analysis were briefly evaluated and the firing temperatures were estimated. From SEM images and EDX analysis, a very good match with XRF analysis was found by means of elemental distribution and especially Na amount was approached as glassifier by sintering of materials in the range of 800 and 1200 °C due to the glassification, vitrification, sulfate removal, and low viscosity bubble formation due to glass melting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Müller-Karpe, A.: Kuşakli-Šarišša Yukari Ülke’de Bir Kült Merkezi. Maşathöyük Kaška Sinir Bölgesinde Bir idare Merkezi. Hititler ve Hitit İmparatorluğu Bin Tanrili Halk. Kunst-und Ausstellungshalle der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Bonn (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Müller-Karpe, A.: Yeni Bir Hitit Merkezi: Kuşakli (Başören/Sivas) 1992 Yili Yüzey Araştirmasi. XI. AST, 259–264 (1994)

  3. Boehmer, R.M.: “Havuzkoy in Ostkappadokien.” AA 82. 1967: 132–41. Orthmann. W. Untersuchungen zur späthethitischen Kunst. Bonn (1971)

  4. von der Osten, H.H.: Explorations in Hittite Asia Minor 1927-28, pp. 69–73. OIC 6, Chicago (1929)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Engin, A.: “Gözecik: Sivas’da Yeni Bir Geç Hitit Merkezi ve Kapi Aslani”. C.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. Aralik 2010. Cilt: 34. Sayi: 2. 60-68

  6. Müller-Karpe, A.: The rise and fall of the Hittite Empire in the light of dendroarchaeological research. In: Manning, S.W., Bruce, M.J. (eds.) Tree-rings and old world archaeology and environment: papers presented in honor of Peter Ian Kuniholm, pp. 1–9. Oxbow Books, Oxford (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Müller-Karpe, A.: “Planning a sacred landscape examples from Šarišša and a Hattusa”. Sacred landscapes of Hitittes and Luwians proceedings of the international conference in honour of Franca Pecchioli Daddi Florence. February 6th-8th 2014. ed. Anacleto D’agostino. Valentina Orsi. Giulia Torri. Firenze University Press. 83–93 (2015)

  8. Atila, N.: Hititlerde Kentsel Yapi: Hattusa. Sapinuva. Šarišša. Tapikka ve Alacahöyük. Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Doktora Tezi, Ankara (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Müller-Karpe, A.: Untersuchungen in Kuşakli 1998. MDOG 131, 57–113 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. https://mgm.gov.tr/veridegerlendirme/il-ve-ilceler-statistik.aspx?k=undefined&m=SIVAS. Accessed 23 May 2021

  11. Karadeli, L.: Yeni Bir Hitit Kenti: Kuşakli – Šarišša. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Aydin (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Müller-Karpe, A.: Untersuchungen in Kuşakli 2002. MDOG 136, 103–135 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Müller-Karpe, A., ve Müller-Karpe, V.: Kusakli-Šarišša. Arkeoatlas. 266- 267 (2011)

  14. Bayazit, M., Işik, İ., Kozbe, G., Güngör., A., İssi, A.: Investigation of a diagnostic group of Bronze Age pottery (Dark Rimmed Orange Bowl ware) from the upper Tigris Valley, Turkey. X-Ray Spectrom. 1–18 (2021)

  15. Oudbashi, O., Hessari, M.: A “Western” imported technology: an analytical study of the Achaemenid Egyptian blue objects. J. Cult. Herit. 47, 246–256 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Santos, H.C., Caliri, C., Pappalardo, L., Romano, F.P., Rizzo, F.: MA-XRF and XRD analysis revealing a polychrome Centuripe vase. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 35, 102760 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Akyuz, S., Akyuz, T., Kurap, G., Basaran, S., Ucar-Cakan, B., Kocabas, I.: Archaeometric investigations of terra-cotta sarcophages from the excavations at ainos (Enez) Turkey: an EDXRF study. Asian J. Chem. 23(7), 3235–3239 (2011)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Akyol, A.A., Kaduiglu, Y.K.: Restoration studies on Phaselis Hadrian Gate (Kemer, Antalya) through archaeometry. Mediter. Archaeol. Archaeom. 13(1), 89–105 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fiorentino, S., Chinni, T., Vandini, M.: Ravenna, its mosaics and the contribution of archaeometry. A systematic reassessment on literature data related to glass tesserae and new considerations. J. Cult. Herit. 46, 335–349 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dey, T., Carter, J.C., Swift, K.: SEM-EDX and FTIR analysis of archaeological ceramic potteries from southern Italy. Microscopy 69(6), 371–380 (2020)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. İssi, A., Özçatal, M., Kara, A., Alp, A.O.: Production technology and provenance study of brittle wares belonging to the late roman period from Harabebezikan/Turkey. Ceram. Int. 43(2), 2182–2187 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Luke, C., Roosevelt, C.H., Cobb, P.J., Çilingiroʇlu, C.: Composing communities: chalcolithic through Iron Age survey ceramics in the Marmara Lake basin, western Turkey. J. Field Archaeol. 40(4), 428–449 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their great attitude to Mr. Ali Alkan, Manager of Sivas Archaeology Museum, for being together as well as his help on friendship approach to us for collecting materials by giving co-signed permission for the Šarišša trip with Mr. Teoman Karaca, Manager of Cultural and Tourism of Sivas City. A part of this study was also conducted in Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Advanced Technology Research and Application Center (CUTAM), in SEM Facility, was also greatly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Özer.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pehlivan, E., Özer, S.A., Pehlivan, G.F. et al. First-time evaluation and characterization of “Šarišša” mudbrick ceramics and findings by SEM–EDX and XRF: chasing the traces of fire. J Aust Ceram Soc 58, 49–62 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41779-021-00668-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41779-021-00668-0

Keywords

Navigation