Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of Granular Fill Layer Underlain by Soft Clay Soil Using Large Scale Cyclic Plate Loading Tests

  • Research paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In general, granular fill materials are widely used to construct new pavement and rehabilitate old pavement. For pavement design, it is essential to know the basic characteristics, such as the permanent deformation behavior of these materials. Considering this phenomenon, this study aims to explain the performance of granular fill layers in pavement systems using cyclic plate load tests. For this purpose, a large-scale cyclic plate load test facility, also known as pavement model testing (PMT), was developed to investigate the permanent deformation characteristics of the pavement structure. To conduct experiments, a standard pavement structure was built with granular fill layers on top of a soft clay subgrade and a geotextile between the subgrade and the base layer. The PMT was used to apply a 40 kN cyclic load through a steel plate with a 305 mm diameter for up to 10,000 cycles after the pavement structure was built. A total of four tests were carried out to evaluate the effects of the granular fill layer's thickness on the pavement's permanent deformation. Furthermore, an analytical solution was developed for the fill layer thickness using the test results. Additionally, the outcomes of some previous studies in the literature were compared to the ones that were obtained. The results of this study indicate that the permanent deformations of the pavement structure and the subgrade increased with the number of load cycles. The permanent deformations began to limit at 3000 cycles when the fill layer thickness was 20 cm, but it was observed that deformations did not limit at 3000 cycles when the fill layer thickness increased to 45 cm. Also, the permanent deformations decreased by two times when the granular fill layer thickness doubled appropriately.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data presented in this paper can be given by the authors upon request.

References

  1. Giroud JP, Noiray L (1981) Geotextile-reinforced unpaved road design. J Geotech Eng Div 107(9):1233–1254. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0001187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Giroud JP, Ah-Line C, Bonaparte R (1984) Design of unpaved roads and trafficked areas with geogrids. In: Proceedings of the conference on polymer grid reinforcement, institution of civil engineers, London UK, pp 116–127. https://doi.org/10.1680/pgr.02425.0021. Accessed 13 June 2023

  3. Love JP, Bund HJ, Milligan GWE, Houlsby GT (1987) Analytical and model studies of reinforcement of a layer of granular fill on a soft clay subgrade. Can Geotech J 24(4):611–622. https://doi.org/10.1139/t87-075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fannin RJ, Sigurdsson O (1996) Field observations on stabilization of unpaved roads with geosynthetics. J Geotechn Eng 122(7):544–553. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:7(544)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Miura N, Sakai A, Taesiri Y, Yamanouchi T, Yasuhara K (1990) Polymer grid reinforced pavement on soft clay ground. Geotext Geomembr 9(1):99–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-1144(90)90007-Y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ling HI, Liu Z (2001) Performance of geosynthetic-reinforced asphalt pavements. J Geotechn Geoenviron Eng 127(2):177–184. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:2(177)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rowe RK, Li LL (2005) Geosynthetic-reinforced embankments over soft foundations. Geosynth Int 12(1):50–85. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.2005.12.1.50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hufenus R, Rueegger R, Banjac R, Mayor P, Springman S, Brönnimann R (2006) Full-scale field tests on geosynthetics reinforced unpaved roads on soft subgrade. Geotext Geomembr 24(1):21–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2005.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Demir A, Laman M, Yildiz A, Ornek M (2013) Large scale field tests on geogrid-reinforced granular fill underlain by clay soil. Geotext Geomembr 38:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2012.05.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Demir A, Sarici T (2017) Bearing capacity of footing supported by geogrid encased stone columns on soft soil. Geomech Eng 12(3):417–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Watts GRA, Blackman DI, Jenner CG (2004) The performance of reinforced unpaved sub-bases subjected to trafficking. In: Proceeding conference EuroGeo 3, IGS, Munich, Germany, pp 261–266. https://library.geosyntheticssociety.org/proceedings/a-8-4-the-performance-of-reinforced-unpaved-sub-bases-subjected-to-trafficing-pdf/. Accessed 13 June 2023

  12. Subaida EA, Chandrakaran S, Sankar N (2009) Laboratory performance of unpaved roads reinforced with woven coir geotextiles. Geotext Geomembr 27(3):204–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2008.11.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Beainy F, Commuri S, Zaman M, Syed I (2013) Viscoelasticplastic model of asphalt-roller interaction. Int J Geomech 13(5):581–594. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hua J, White T (2002) A study of nonlinear tire contact pressure effects on HMA rutting. Int J Geomech 2(3):353–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/15323640208500183?scroll=top&role=tab&aria-labelledby=refs

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim M, Tutumluer E, Kwon J (2009) Nonlinear pavement foundation modeling for three-dimensional finite-element analysis of flexible pavements. Int J Geomech 9(5):195–208. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2009)9:5(195)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Khalaj O, Tafreshi MSN, Mašek B, Dawson AR (2015) Improvement of pavement foundation response with multi-layers of geocell reinforcement: cyclic plate load test. Geomech Eng 9(3):373–395. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2015.9.3.373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen J, Lin C, Stein E, Hothan J (2004) Development of a mechanistic-empirical model to characterize rutting in flexible pavements. J Transp Eng 130(4):519–525. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2004)130:4(519)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Theyse H, De Beer M, Rust F (1996) Overview of South African mechanistic pavement design method. Transport Res Rec 1539(1):6–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198196153900102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kazmee H, Tutumluer E (2015) Evaluation of aggregate subgrade materials used as pavement subgrade/granular subbase. Research report FHWA-ICT-15-013, Illinois Center for Transportation, Illinois, USA. https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/items/80797. Accessed 13 June 2023

  20. Dawson A, Kolisoja P (2006) Managing rutting in low volume roads. ROADEX III final report, Part 2.1. The Swedish Road Administration, Rovaniemi, Finland. https://www.roadex.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Managing-Rutting_English.pdf. Accessed 13 June 2023

  21. Barksdale RD (1991) The aggregate handbook. National Stone Association edition, Washington DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  22. Abu-Farsakh M, Chen Q (2012) Evaluation of the base/subgrade soil under repeated loading: phase II—in-box and ALF cyclic plate load tests. FHWA/LA.10/471, Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, Louisiana Transportation Research Center, Louisiana, USA. www.ltrc.lsu.edu/pdf/2012/fr_471.pdf. Accessed 13 June 2023

  23. Khoueiry N, Briançon L, Riot M, Daouadji A (2021) Full-scale laboratory tests of geosynthetic reinforced unpaved roads on a soft subgrade. Geosynth Int 28(4):435–449. https://doi.org/10.1680/jgein.21.0000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Abu-Farsakh M, Hanandeh S, Mohammad L, Chen A (2019) Performance evaluation of geosynthetic reinforced pavement built over weak subgrade soil using cyclic plate load test. In: Geosynthetics conference 2019, IGS, Huston, TX, USA

  25. Sheikh IR, Wani KS, Jalal FE, Shah MY (2022) An investigation on the behaviour of geosynthetic reinforced quarry waste bases (QWB) under vertical loading. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(28):43385–43400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18238-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nazeri A, Ziaie-Moayed R, Ghiasinejad H (2022) Evaluating the efficiency of a composite geosynthetic reinforcement in container yard pavements via laboratory plate load test. Int J Pavement Eng 23(5):1622–1633. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2020.1817449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sharbaf M, Ghafoori N (2021) Laboratory evaluation of geogrid-reinforced flexible pavements. Transport Eng 4:100070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.treng.2021.100070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jayalath CPG, Wimalasena K, Gallage C (2022) Small-scale cyclic loading test to investigate the rutting performance of geogrid-reinforced unpaved pavements. Int J Pavement Res Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42947-022-00259-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Abu-Farsakh M, Hanandeh S, Tang X, Chen Q (2016) Sustainability evaluation of geosynthetic stabilized soft subgrade soil in unpaved test sections. Geo-Chicago 2016, Chicago, USA, pp 687–696. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784480137.065

  30. Tang X, Abu-Farsakh M, Hanandeh S, Chen Q (2014) Use of geosynthetics for reinforcing/stabilizing unpaved roads under full-scale truck axle loads. In: Shale energy engineering conference 2014. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Pennsylvania, USA, pp 591–602

  31. Tang X, Abu-Farsakh M, Hanandeh S, Chen Q (2014) Evaluation of geosynthetics in unpaved roads built over natural soft subgrade using full-scale accelerated pavement testing. In: Geo-congress 2014 technical papers geocharacterization and modeling for sustainability. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Georgia, USA, pp 3035–3043

  32. Hanandeh S, Abu-Farsakh M, Mohammad L, Chen Q, Saghebfar M (2016) Full-scale accelerated load testing of geosynthetics reinforced/stabilized paved roads built over native soft subgrade. In: GeoAmericas 2016, IGS, Miami, FL, USA

  33. ASTM D 3080-98 (2003) Standard test method for direct shear test of soils under consolidated drained conditions. Annual book of ASTM standards, West Conshohocken, USA, pp 347–352. https://doi.org/10.1520/D3080-04

  34. Demir A, Ok B, Sarıcı T, Dost Y, Hacak B, Epsileli SE, Bağrıaçık B (2016) Evaluation of the performance of flexible road pavements reinforced with geosynthetics under cyclic loads. In: KGM-ARGE 2012-3, Republic of Turkey Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communications, General Directorate of Highways, Ankara, Turkey

  35. Cui X, Zhang N, Zhang J, Gao Z (2014) In situ tests simulating traffic-load-induced settlement of alluvial silt subsoil. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 58:10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.11.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Chai J, Miura N (2002) Traffic-Load-Induced permanent deformation of road on soft subsoil. J Geotechn Geoenviron Eng 128(11):907–916. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2002)128:11(907)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Fujikawa K, Miura N (1996) Field investigation on the low embankment due to traffic load and its prediction. Soils Found 36(4):147–153. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.36.4_147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Djellali A, Houam A, Saghafi B, Hamdane A, Benghazi Z (2017) Static analysis of flexible pavements over expansive soils. Int J Civil Eng 15:391–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-016-0058-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Yin F, Zhou H, Liu H, Chu J (2018) Experimental and numerical analysis of XCC pile-geogrid foundation for existing expressway under traffic load. Int J Civil Eng 16:1371–1388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-017-0267-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Abu-Farsakh M, Chen Q (2011) Evaluation of geogrid base reinforcement in flexible pavement using cyclic plate load testing. Int J Pavement Eng 12(3):275–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2010.549565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Jegatheesan P, Gnanendran CT (2016) Permanent deformation study of pavement layers using laboratory pavement model testing. Int J Geomech 16(3):04015072. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Leng J, Gabr MA (2002) Characteristics of geogrid-reinforced aggregate under cyclic load. Transport Res Rec J Transport Res Board 1786(1):29–35. https://doi.org/10.3141/1786-04

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work presented in this paper was carried out with funding from the Republic of Turkey General Directorate of Highways grant number KGM-ARGE/2012-3. The authors would like to express their thanks to personnel at the research center of Mersin 5th regional office and the General Directorate of Highways for providing valuable help and support in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmet Demir.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Demir, A., Ok, B. & Sarici, T. Evaluation of Granular Fill Layer Underlain by Soft Clay Soil Using Large Scale Cyclic Plate Loading Tests. Int J Civ Eng 21, 1853–1865 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-023-00861-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-023-00861-1

Keywords

Navigation