Skip to main content
Log in

An Investigation on the Formation of Cracks at the Corner Turns of the Modular Block Earth Walls

  • Research paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The design manuals for Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls include the methodology for various conditions, except the case where the wall has a curved corner turn. Lately, some problems were reportedly associated with these types of walls. One of the typical problems is cracking/separation of the modular blocks. The most common method for analysing the behaviour of reinforced soil walls is a 2-D plane-strain analysis, which is insufficient for the current problem. Therefore, in this study, a 3-D finite-element (FE) model, that is capable of modelling corner turns, has been established. The main elements of the model are modular blocks, interface elements, soil, and reinforcements. As a first step, the performance of the FE model was evaluated by comparing the stress–strain response of a laboratory-scale wall with its counterpart in the FE program. Later, a large-size modular block wall model was created and run with various input parameters. The modelling results revealed that the reinforcement stiffness and the soil modulus are effective in the separation and cracking of blocks. It is considered that the cracking of blocks is related to an excessive stress build-up. These stresses reduced when the reinforcement stiffness increased. It is foreseen that the crack occurrence is less likely to happen under reduced stress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. AASHTO (2002) Standard specifications for highway bridges, 17th edn., pp 111–174

  2. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) (2010) Design and construction of mechanically stabilized earth walls and reinforced soil slopes. Federal Highway Administration Demonstration Project 82, Washington, DC, USA, 2010

  3. Adams M, Nicks J, Stabile T, Wu J, Schlatter W, Hartmann J (2011) Geosynthetic reinforced soil integrated bridge system interim implementation guide, Federal Highway Administration, Mclean, VA, 2011

  4. National Concrete Masonry Association (NCMA) (2010) Seismic design of segmental retaining walls, TEK 15-9A, 2010, http://www.ncma.org. Accessed 2014

  5. El-Emam MM, Bathurst RJ (2005) “Facing contribution to seismic response of reduced-scale reinforced soil walls”. Geosynth Int 12(3):215–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Guler E, Hamderi M, Demirkan MM (2007) “Numerical analysis of reinforced soil-retaining wall structure with cohesive and granular backfills”. Geosynth Int 14(6):330–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Guler E, Enunlu AK (2009) “Investigation of dynamic behaviour of geosynthetic reinforced soil retaining structures under earthquake loads”. Bull Earthq Eng 7(3):737–777 (R2-1)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Guler E, Cicek E, Demirkan MM, Hamderi M (2012) “Numerical analysis of reinforced soil walls with granular and cohesive backfills under cyclic loads”. Bull Earthq Eng 10(3):793–811 (R2-1)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Guler E, Alexiew D, Basbug E (2012) “Behaviour of geogrid reinforced segmental block walls under earthquake loads”, Geoeuro 5, 5th European Geosynthetics Congress, Valencia Spain, 2012, pp 793–811

  10. Guler E, Selek O (2014) “Reduced-scale shaking table tests on geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls with modular facing”. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 140(6):0414015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Koseki J, Bathurst RJ, Guler E, Kuwano J, Maugeri M (2006) Keynote lecture: Seismic stability of reinforced soil walls, 8th Int. Conf. on Geosynthetics, Yokohama, Japan, Millpress, Rotterdam, Netherlands, vol. 1, pp 51–77

  12. Ling HI, Liu H, Mohri Y (2005) “Parametric studies on the behaviour of reinforced soil retaining walls under earthquake loading”. J Eng Mech 131:1056–1065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ling HI, Mohri Y, Leshchinsky D (2005) “Large-scale shaking table tests on modular block reinforced Soil retaining walls”. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 131:465–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ling HI, Yang S, Leshchinsky D, Liu H, Burke C (2010) “Finite element simulations of full-scale modular-block reinforced soil retaining walls under earthquake loading”. J Eng Mech 10(106):653–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ling HI, Leshchinsky D, Mohri Y, Wang JP (2012) “Earthquake response of reinforced segmental retaining walls backfilled with substantial percentage of fines”. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 1061(10):934–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nova-Roessig L, Sitar N (2006) “Centrifuge model studies of the seismic response of reinforced soil slopes”. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 132(3):388–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Walters DL, Allen TM, Bathurst RJ (2002) “Conversion of geosynthetic strain to load using reinforcement stiffness”. Geosynth Int 9(5–6):483–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Watanbe K, Munaf Y, Koseki J, Tateyama M, Kojima K (2003) Behaviours of several types of model retaining walls subjected to irregular excitation”. Soils Found 43(5):13–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yu Y, Bathurst RJ, Miyata Y (2015) “Numerical analysis of a mechanically stabilized earth wall reinforced with steel strips”. Soils Found 55(3):536–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Aldeeky H, Al Hattamleh O, Abu Alfoul B (2016) “Effect of sand placement method on the interface friction of sand and geotextile”. Int J Civil Eng 14(2):133–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Keshavarz A, Ebrahimi M (2016) “The effects of the soil-wall adhesion and friction angle on the active lateral earth pressure of circular retaining walls”. Int J Civil Eng 14(2):97–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Soltani-Jigheh H (2016) “Compressibility and shearing behaviour of clayey soil reinforced by plastic waste”. Int J Civil Eng 14(7):479–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fan CC (2006) “Performance of a two-tier geosynthetic reinforced segmental retaining wall under a surcharge load: Full-scale load test and 3-D finite element analysis”. Comput Geotech 33:69–85

  24. Yoo C, Kim SB (2008) “Performance of a two-tier geosynthetic reinforced segmental retaining wall under a surcharge load: full-scale load test and 3-D finite element analysis”. Geotext Geomembr 26:460–472

  25. Diana User’s Manual (2014) Release 9.5, TNO DIANA BV, Netherlands

  26. Duncan JM, Chang CY (1970) “Nonlinear analysis of stress and strains in soils”. J Soil Mech Found Divi ASCE 96 5:1629–1653

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murat Hamderi.

Ethics declarations

Funding

There is no special funding source for this study. The funding came from the first author. However, the experiments were conducted in Bogazici University, Istanbul.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 520 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hamderi, M., Guler, E. & Raouf, A. An Investigation on the Formation of Cracks at the Corner Turns of the Modular Block Earth Walls. Int J Civ Eng 17, 219–230 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-017-0216-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-017-0216-5

Keywords

Navigation