Skip to main content
Log in

A New Finite Element for Back Analysis of a Geogrid Reinforced Soil Retaining Wall Failure

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a new approach for back analysis of a geogrid reinforced soil (GRS) wall failure is presented. A new zero-thickness cohesive fracture element is utilized to simulate the slip surface behind the GRS wall. This element can simulate displacement discontinuity as well as tractions across the shear band effectively. The numerical results are compared with the measured values from the physical test as well as the obtained values from the typical finite element method. This paper demonstrates that the proposed finite element algorithm via discrete modeling of the shear band can effectively improve the quality of numerical back analysis of the soil failure which explains its necessity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allen TM, Bathurst RJ, Berg RR (2002) Global level of safety and performance of geosynthetic walls: an historical perspective. Geosynth Int 9:395–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Santos ECG, Palmeira EM, Bathurst RJ (2013) Behaviour of a geogrid reinforced wall built with recycled construction and demolition waste backfill on a collapsible foundation. Geotext Geomembr 39:9–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Karpurapu RG, Bathurst RJ (1995) Behaviour of geosynthetic reinforced soil retaining walls using the finite element method. Comput Geotech 17:279–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tafreshi SN, Nouri TA (2014) A simplified pseudo-static seismic analysis of reinforced soil walls with uniform surcharge. Int J Civil Eng 12(2):97–109

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ling HI, Tatsuoka F, Tateyama M (1995) Simulating performance of GRS-SW by finite element procedure. J Geotech Eng ASCE 121:330–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yoo C, Jung H (2006) Case history of geosynthetic reinforced segmental retaining wall failure. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 132:1538–1548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Keshavarz A, Ebrahimi M (2016) The effects of the soil-wall adhesion and friction angle on the active lateral earth pressure of circular retaining walls. Int J Civil Eng 14:97–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Aldeeky H, Al Hattamleh O, Alfoul BA (2016) Effect of sand placement method on the interface of sand and geotextile. Int J Civil Eng 14:133–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rudnicki JW, Rice JR (1975) Conditions for the localization of deformation in pressure-sensitive dilatant materials. J Mech Phys Solids 23:371–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Palmer AC, Rice JR (1973) The growth of slip surfaces in the progressive failure of overconsolidated clay. Proc R Soc Lond A 332:527–548

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Lai TY, Borja RI, Duvernay BG, Meehan RL (2003) Capturing strain localization behind a geosynthetic-reinforced soil wall. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 27: 425–451

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Cooper MR, Bromhead EN, Petley DJ, Grant DI (1998) The Selborne cutting stability experiment. Géotechnique 48:83–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Samaniego E, Belytschko T (2005) Continuum-discontinuum modelling of shear bands. Int J Numer Methods Eng 62: 1857–1872

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Barani OR, Khoei AR, Mofid M (2011) Modeling of cohesive crack growth in partially saturated porous media; a study on the permeability of cohesive fracture. Int J Fract 167:15–31

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Barani OR, Khoei AR (2014) 3D Modeling of cohesive crack growth in partially saturated porous media; a parametric study. Eng Fract Mech 124–125:272–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Barenblatt GI (1962) The mathematical theory of equilibrium cracks in brittle fracture. Adv Appl Mech 7:55–62

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Dugdale DS (1960) Yielding of steel sheets containing slits. J Mech Phys Solids 8:100–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Khoei AR, Barani OR, Mofid M (2011) Modeling of dynamic cohesive fracture propagation in porous saturated media. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 35: 1160–1184

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Bathurst RJ, Benjamin DJ (1990) Failure of a geogrid-reinforced soil wall. Transp Res Rec 1288:109–116

    Google Scholar 

  20. Camacho GT, Ortiz M (1996) Computational modeling of impact damage in brittle materials. Int J Solids Struct 33:2899–2938

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Khoei AR, Moslemi H, Majd Ardakany K, Barani OR, Azadi H (2009) Modeling of cohesive crack growth using an adaptive mesh refinement via the modified-SPR technique. Int J Fract 159:21–41

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Gui Y, Bui HH, Kodikara J (2015) An application of a cohesive fracture model combining compression, tension and shear in soft rocks. Comput Geotech 66:142–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Song SH, Paulino GP, Buttlar WG (2006) A bilinear cohesive zone model tailored for fracture of asphalt concrete considering viscoelastic bulk material. Eng Fract Mech 73:2829–2848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Khoei AR (2005) Computational plasticity in powder forming processes. Elsevier, UK

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Omid Reza Barani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barani, O.R., Bahrami, M. & Sadrnejad, S.A. A New Finite Element for Back Analysis of a Geogrid Reinforced Soil Retaining Wall Failure. Int J Civ Eng 16, 435–441 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-017-0150-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-017-0150-6

Keywords

Navigation