Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A review of water-sensitive urban design technologies and practices for sustainable stormwater management

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sustainable Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This review paper presents, in a critical and systematic way, the published researches on water-sensitive urban design (WSUD) technologies and practices. The aim of WSUD is the long-term sustainability for urban water cycle management; it minimises the hydrological impacts of urban development on the surrounding environments. It considers stormwater as a valuable resource. The applications of WSUD technologies in practice could be the solution of everyday problems of small-scale stormwater management—flood control, pollution control and stormwater harvesting. This paper focuses on the recent research outcomes of several frequently used WSUD technologies including infiltration systems, permeable pavements, bio-retention systems, vegetated swales and rainwater harvesting systems; their barriers and adaptations; and future research directions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

(modified from Gold Coast City Council 2005; Department of Planning and Local Government 2009; Chowdhury 2011; Kim et al. 2012)

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdullah FA, Shareef AWA (2009) Roof rainwater harvesting systems for household water supply in Jordan. Desalination 243(1–3):195–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abida H, Sabourin JF (2006) Grass-swale perforated pipe systems for stormwater management. J Irrig Drain Eng 132(1):55–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ackerman D, Stein ED (2008) Evaluating the effectiveness of best management practices using dynamic modelling. J Environ Eng 134(8):628–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahammed F, Hewa GA (2012) Development of hydrological tools using extreme rainfall events for Dhaka, Bangladesh. Water Int 37(1):43–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahammed F, Hewa GA, Argue JR (2012) Applying WSUD principles to manage stormwater in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Proceedings of OzWater’12, Sydney p 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahammed F, Hewa GA, Argue JR (2013) Introducing leaky-well concept for stormwater quantity control in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Appl Water Sci 3(1):115–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahearn D, Tveten R (2008) Legacy LID: stormwater treatment in unimproved embankments along highway shoulders in Western Washington. International Low Impact Development Conference, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahiablame LM, Engel BA, Chaubey I (2012) Effectiveness of low impact development practices: literature review and suggestions for future research. Water Air Soil Pollut 223(7):4253–4273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed W, Huygens F, Goonetilleke A, Gardner T (2008) Real-time PCR detection of pathogenic microorganisms in roof-harvested rainwater in Southeast Queensland, Australia. Appl Environ Microbiol 74(17):5490–5496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argue JR (2004) Water sensitive urban design: basic procedure for source control of stormwater: a handbook for Australian practice (1st ed.). Urban Water Resource Centre, University of South Australia, Adelaide

    Google Scholar 

  • Argue JR (2013) Water sensitive urban design: basic procedure for source control of stormwater: a handbook for Australian practice (6th ed.). Urban Water Resource Centre, University of South Australia, Adelaide

    Google Scholar 

  • Argue JR, Pezzaniti D (2007) Towards sustainability of waterways in urbanising catchments. Proceedings of NOVATECH, Lyon, p 279–286

  • Auckland City Council (2003) Soakage design manual. Auckland City Council, Auckland

    Google Scholar 

  • Backhaus A, Fryd O (2012) Analysing the first loop design process for large-scale sustainable urban drainage system retrofits in Copenhagen, Denmark. Environ Plan B 39:820–837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber ME, King SG, Yonge DR, Hathhorn WE (2003) Ecology ditch: a best management practice for storm water runoff mitigation. J Hydrol Eng 8(3):111–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett ME (2005) Performance comparison of structural stormwater best management practice. Water Environ Res 77(1):78–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett ME (2008) Comparison of BMP performance using the international BMP Database. J Irrig Drain Eng 134(5):556–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett ME, Taylor S (2004) Retrofit of storm water treatment controls in highway environments. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference of Sustainable Techniques Strategies in Urban Water Management, Lyon p 243–250

  • Basinger M, Montalto F, Lall U (2010) A rainwater harvesting system reliability model based on nonparametric stochastic rainfall generator. J Hydrol 392(3–4):105–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beecham S (2003) Water sensitive urban design: a technological assessment. Waterfall J Stormwater Ind Assoc 17:5–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Beecham S (2010) Water sensitive urban design-1, Adelaide: Water of a City, eds Daniels, C., Hudson, J., Barbara Hardy Centre for Sustainable Urban Environments, University of South Australia, Adelaide p 451–465

  • Beecham S, Chowdhury RK (2010) Temporal characteristics and variability of point rainfall: a statistical and wavelet analysis. Int J Climatol 30(3):458–473

    Google Scholar 

  • Beecham S, Pezzaniti D, Myers B, Shackel B, Pearson A (2009) Experience in the application of permeable interlocking concrete paving in Australia. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Concrete Block Paving, Argentina, pp 1–8

  • Beecham S, Pezzaniti D, Kandasamy J (2012) Stormwater treatments using permeable pavements. Water Manag 165(3):161–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Blecken GT, Zinger Y, Deletic A, Fletcher TD, Viklander M (2009) Impact of submerged zone and a carbon source on heavy metal removal in stormwater biofilters. Ecol Eng 35(5):769–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouwer H (2000) Artificial recharge of groundwater: hydrogeology and engineering. Hydrogeol J 10(1): 21–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratieres K, Fletcher TD, Deletic A, Zinger Y (2008) Nutrients and sediment removal by stormwater biofilters: a large scale design optimisation study. Water Res 42(14):3930–3940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown R (2005) Impediments to integrated stormwater management: the need for institutional reform. Environ Manag 36(3):455–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown RR, Farrelly MA (2009) Challenges ahead: social and institutional factors influencing sustainable urban stormwater management in Australia. Water Sci Technol 59(4):653–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown R, Keath N, Wong THF (2009a) Urban water management in cities: historical, current and future regimes. Water Sci Technol 59(5):847–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown C, Chu A, Duin BV, Valeo C (2009b) Characteristics of sediment removal in two types of permeable pavements. Water Qual Res J Can 44(1):59–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne D, Deletic A, Mudd GM, Fletcher TD (2008) A new saturated/unsaturated model for stormwater infiltration systems. Hydrol Process 22(25):4838–4849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodie I (2011) Application of level spreader - gas filter strips in South East Queensland, Australia for discharge reduction and passive irrigation. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Urban Drainage, Porto Alegre p 1–9

  • Cameron C, Richard HR (2010) Performance assessment of a street drainage bioretention system. Water Environ Res 82(2):109–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campisano A, Modica C (2012) Optimal sizing of storage tanks for domestic rainwater harvesting in Sicily. Resour, Conserv Recycl 63: 9–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth SM, Nnadi E, Oyelola O, Bennett J, Warwick F, Jackson R, Lawson D (2012) Laboratory based experiment to assess the use of green and food based compost to improve water quality in sustainable drainage (SUDS) device such as swale. Sci Total Environ 424:337–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu YR, Liaw CH, Chen LC (2009) Optimizing rainwater harvesting systems as an innovative approach to saving energy in hilly communities. Renewable. Energy 34(3):492–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury RK (2011) Assessment of observed rainfall variability and its implications for WSUD in Australia. PhD Thesis, University of South Australia

  • Collins KA, Hunt WF, Hathaway JM (2008) Hydrologic and water quality evaluation of four permeable pavements in North Carolina, USA. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Urban Drainage, Edinburgh p 1–10

  • Collins KA, Hunt WF, Hathaway JM (2010) Side-by-side comparison of nitrogen species removal for four types of permeable pavement and standard asphalt in Eastern North Carolina. J Hydrol Eng 15(6):512–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Construction Industry Research and Information Association (1996) Infiltration drainage-manual for good practice. CIRIA Report 156, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombes PJ, Kuczera G (2003) Analysis of the performance of rainwater tanks in Australian capital cities. Proceedings of the 28th Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium, Engineers Australia, Hobart p 2243–2250

  • Coombes PJ, Argue JR, Kuczera, G (1999) Figtree place: a case study in water sensitive urban development (WSUD). Urban Water 1(4):335–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombes PJ, Kuczera G, Argue JR (2002) An evaluation of the benefits of source control measures at the regional scale. Urban Water 4(4):307–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coustumer SL, Fletcher TD, Deletic A, Barraud S, Lewis JF (2009) Hydraulic performance of bio-filter systems for stormwater management: influences of design and operation. J Hydrol 376(1–2):16–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis AP, Shokouhian M, Sharma H, Minami C (2006) Water quality improvement through bioretention media: nitrogen and phosphorous removal. Water Environ Res 78(3):284–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis AP, Hunt WF, Traver RG, Clar M (2009) Bioretention technology: overview of current practice and future needs. J Environ Eng 135(3):109–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis AP, Stagge JH, Jamil E, Kim H (2012) Hydraulic performance of grass swales for managing highway runoff. Water Res 46(20):6775–6786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Infrastructure and Planning (2009) South East Queensland Regional Plan 2009–2031. Department of Infrastructure and Planning, Queensland Government, Brisbane

  • Department of Environmental Resources (1999) Low impact development: an integrated design approach. Department of Environmental Resources, Prince George’s County, Upper Marlboro

  • Department of Planning and Local Government (2009) Water sensitive urban design technical manual for Greater Adelaide Region. Department of Planning and Local Government, South Australian Government, Adelaide

  • Dechesne M, Barraud S, Bardin JP (2005) Experimental assessment of stormwater infiltration basin evaluation. J Environ Eng 131(7):1090–1098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deletic A (2001) Modelling of water and sediment transport over grassed areas. J Hydrol 248(1–4):168–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deletic A, Fletcher TD (2006) Performance of grass filters used for stormwater treatment—a field and modelling study. J Hydrol 317(3–4):261–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz ME (2007) Low impact development practices: a review of current research and recommendations for future directions. Water Air Soil Pollut 186(1–4):351–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domenech L, Sauri D (2011) Comparative appraisal of the use of rainwater harvesting in single and multiple family buildings of the metropolitan area of Barcelona (Spain): social experience, drinking water savings and economic costs. J Cleaner Prod 19(6–7):598–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott AH, Trowsdale SA (2007) A review of models for low impact urban stormwater drainage. Environ Modell Softw 22(3):394–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson CH, Wadzuk BM, Traver RG (2010) Hydraulic evaluation and total suspended solids capture of an infiltration trench. Hydrol Process 24(8):1008–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EPA: Environmental Protection Agency (2000) Low impact development- a literature review. Office of Water, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson AJ, Gulliver JS, Weiss PT, Wilson CB (2009) Survey of stormwater BMP maintenance practices. Proceedings of UCOWR Conference, Washington D.C., 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson AJ, Gulliver JS, Kang JH, Weiss PT, Wilson CB (2010) Maintenance for stormwater treatment practices. J Contempor Water Res Educ 146(1):75–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ermilio JR, Traver RG (2006) Hydrologic and pollutant removal performance of a bio-retention BMP. Proceedings of the World Environmental and Water Resources Congress, Nebraska, p 1–12

  • Eroksuz E, Rahman A (2010) Rainwater tanks in multi-unit buildings: a case study for three Australian cities. Resour, Conserv Recycl 54(12):1449–1452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • eWater (2010) Model for urban stormwater improvement conceptualization. eWater Cooperative Research Centre, Bruce

  • Fach S, Engelhard C, Wittke N, Rauch W (2011) Performance infiltration swales with regard to operation in winter time in Alpine region. Water Sci Technol 63(11):2658–2664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang HY, Adrian DD, Deng ZQ (2009) Fuzzy recognition method for best management practice of urban runoff quality. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, Beijing p 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrelly M, Brown R (2011) Rethinking urban water management: experimentation as a way forward. Glob Environ Chang 21(2):721–732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fassman EA (2009) Monitoring of a series of swales within a stormwater treatment train. Proceedings of 33rd IAHR World Congress, Vancouver, p 7024–7031

    Google Scholar 

  • Fewkes A (2012) A review of rainwater harvesting in the UK. Struct Surv 30(2):174–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher TD, Shuster W, Hunt WF et al. (2015) SUDS, LIDS, BMPs, WSUD and more—the evaluation and application terminology surrounding urban drainage. Urban Water J 12(7):525–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flower DJM, Mitchell VG, Codner GP (2007) Urban water systems: drivers of climate change? Proceedings of the IRCSA XIII Conference, Sydney, p 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Freni G, Mannina G, Viviani G (2010) Urban storm-water quality management: centralized versus source control. J Water Resour Plann Manag 136(2):268–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fryd O, Dam T, Jensen MB (2012) A planning framework for sustainable urban drainage systems. Water Policy 14(5):865–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner A, Hardy M (2005) Beyond the demonstration mode: the application of WSUD in Australia. Aust Plann 42(4):17–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilroy KL, McCuen RH (2009) Spatio-temporal effects of low impact development practices. J Hydrol 367(3–4):228–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gobel P, Zimmermann J, Klinger C, Stubbe H, Coldewey WG (2008) Urban impacts on soils and groundwater. J Soils Sedim 8(4):231–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes UAF, Heller L, Pena JL (2012) A national program for large scale rainwater harvesting: an individual or public responsibility? Water Resources. Management 26(9):2703–2714

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold Coast City Council (2005) Water sensitive urban design guidelines, Policy 11, Sect. 13. Gold Coast City Council, Queensland Government, Gold Coast City

  • Hatt BE, Fletcher TD, Deletic A (2007) Treatment performance of gravel filter media: implications for design and application of stormwater infiltration systems. Water Res 41(12):2513–2524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatt BE, Fletcher TD, Deletic A (2009) Hydrologic and pollutant removal performance of stormwater biofiltration systems at the field scale. J Hydrol 365(3–4):310–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmreich B, Horn H (2009) Opportunities in rainwater harvesting. Desalination 248(1–3):118–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson C, Greenway M, Phillips I (2007) Removal of dissolved nitrogen, phosphorous and carbon from stormwater by biofiltration mesocosms. Water Sci Technol 55(4):183–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou L, Feng S, Ding Y, Zhang S, Huo Z (2008) Experimental study on rainfall-runoff relation for porous pavements. Hydrol Res 39(3):181–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh PC, Chen YC (2012) Surface water flow over a pervious pavement. Int Num J Num Anal Methods Geo-mechanics 37(9):1095–1105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang B, Wu H, Shu X, Burdette EG (2010) Laboratory evaluation of permeability and strength of polymer—modified pervious concrete. Constr Build Mater 24(5):818–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt WF, Smith JT, Jadlocki SJ, Hathaway JM, Eubanks PR (2008) Pollutant removal and peak flow mitigation by a bio-retention cell in urban Charlotte, NC. J Environ Eng 134(5):403–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imteaz MA, Adeboye, OB, Rayburg S, Shanableh A (2012) Rainwater harvesting potential for southwest Nigeria using daily water balance model. Resour, Conserv Recycl 62:51–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imteaz MA, Ahsan A, Rahman A, MekaniK F (2013) Modelling stormwater treatment systems using MUSIC: accuracy. Resour, Conserv and Recycl 71:15–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam MD, Chou FNF, Kabir MR, Liaw CH (2010) Rainwater: a potential alternative source for scarce safe drinking and arsenic contaminated water in Bangladesh. Water Resour Manag 24(14):3987–4008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ismail AF, Sapari N, Wahab MMA (2010) Treatment of stormwater runoff from construction sites by vegetative swale. Proceedings of World Engineering, Science and Technology Congress, Kuala Lumpur p 1–5

  • Jensen MB (2004) Hydrological conditions for contaminant leaching through highway swales. Water Air Soil Pollut 158(1):169–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayhanian M, Anderson D, Harvey JT, Jones D, Muhunthan B (2012) Permeability measurement and scan imaging to assess clogging of pervious concrete pavements in parking lots. J Environ Manag 95(1):114–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazemi F, Beecham S, Gibbs J (2011) Streetscape biodiversity and the role of bio-retention swales in Australian urban environment. Landscape Urban Plann 101(2):139–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim H, Han M, Lee JY (2012) The application of an analytical probabilistic model for estimating the rainfall-runoff reductions achieved using a rainwater harvesting system. Sci Total Environ 424:213–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby JT, Durrans SR, Pitt R, Johnson PD (2005) Hydraulic resistance in grass swales designed for small flow conveyance. J Hydraul Eng 131(1):65–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuang X, Sansalone J, Ying G, Ranieri V (2011) Pore-structure models of hydraulic conductivity for permeable pavement. J Hydrol 399(3–4):148–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunapo J, Chandra S, Peterson J (2009) Drainage network modelling for water sensitive urban design. Trans GIS 13(2):167–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lan Z, Eric SA, Allen DP, Jeffrey KS (2010) The capture and destruction of Escherichia coli from simulated urban runoff using conventional bio-retention media and iron oxide coated sand. Water Environ Res 82(8):701–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee A, Hewa GA, Pizzaniti D, Argue JR (2007) The use of water sensitive urban design (WSUD) to minimise impacts of urbanization on natural stream low flow regimes. Proceedings of the 5th Water Sensitive Urban Design Conference, Sydney p 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee JY, Yang JS, Han M, Choi J (2010a) Comparison of the microbiological and chemical characterization of harvested rainwater and reservoir water as alternative water resources. Sci Total Environ 408:896–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Yigitcanlar T, Dawes LA, Goonetilleke A (2010b) Investigating challenges and opportunities for knowledge based development of Australian cities. Proceedings of 3rd Knowledge Based World Summit, Melbourne p 676–686

    Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Davis AP (2008) Heavy metal capture and accumulation in bioretention media. Environ Sci Technol 42(14):5247–5253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Boyle F, Reynolds A (2010) Rainwater harvesting and greywater treatment systems for domestic application in Ireland. Desalination 260(1–3):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lian C, Zhuge Y (2010) Optimum mix design of enhanced permeable concrete—an experimental investigation. Constr Build Mater 24(12):2664–2671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lian C, Zhuge Y, Beecham S (2011) The relationship between porosity and strength for porous concrete. Constr Build Mater 25(11):4294–4298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin KS, Chang NB, Chuang TD (2008) Fine structure characterization of zero-valent iron nanoparticles for decontamination of nitrites and nitrates in wastewater and groundwater. Sci Technol Adv Mater 9(2):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd S (2001) Water sensitive urban design in the Australian context: synthesis of the conference. Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd S, Wong THF, Chesterfield CJ (2002) Water sensitive urban design: a stormwater management prospective. Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology, Logan City

  • Logan City Council (2010) Standards for stormwater, overland flow and flood plain management. Logan City Council, Queensland Government, Logan City

  • Lucke T, Beecham S (2011) An investigation into long term infiltration rates for permeable pavements on sloping sub-catchments. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Urban Drainage, Porto Alegre p 1–8

  • Maharaj KT, Grabowiecki P, Scholz M (2009) Energy and temperature performance analysis of geothermal (ground source) heat pumps integrated with permeable pavement systems for urban runoff reuse. Int J Sustain Eng 2(3):201–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazer G, Ewing K (2001) Limitations to vegetation establishment and growth in biofiltration swales. Ecol Eng 17(4):429–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Memon FA, Lobban A, Butler D, Djordjevic S (2009) Modelling the effectiveness of rainwater harvesting as a stormwater management option. Proceedings of the 33rd IAHR World Congress, Vancouver p 2413–2420

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendez CB, Klenzendorf JB, Afshar BR, Simmons MT, Barrett ME, Kinney KA, Kirisits MJ (2011) The effect of roofing material on quality of harvested rainwater. Water Res 45(5):2049–2059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montalto F, Behr C, Alfredo K, Wolf M, Arye M, Walsh M (2007) Rapid assessment of the cost effectiveness of low impact development for CSO control. Landscape Urban Plann 82(3):117–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morison PJ, Brown R (2011) Understanding the publics and local policy commitment to Water Sensitive Urban Design. Landscape Urban Plann 99(2):83–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthanna TM, Viklander M, Gjesdahl N, Thorolfsson S (2007) Heavy metal removal in cold climate bioretention. Water Air Soil Pollut 183(1–4):391–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers BR, Beecham S, Leeuwen JAV, Keegan A (2009) Depletion rate of E. coli in permeable pavement mineral aggregate storage and reuse systems. Water Sci Technol 60(12):3091–3099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman P (2001) Sustainable urban water systems in rich and poor cities—steps towards a new approach. Water Sci Technol 43(4):93–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C, Craps M, Dewulf A (2007) Social learning and water resources management. Ecol Soc 12(5):19–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Palla A, Gnecco I, Lanza LG, Barbera L (2012) Performance analysis of domestic rainwater harvesting systems under various European climate zones. Resour, Conserv Recycl 62:71–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters EJ (2012) Drought monitoring for rooftop rainwater-harvesting systems. Water Manag 165(6):301–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Pezzaniti D, Beecham S, Kandasamy J (2009) Influence of clogging on the effective life of permeable pavements. Water Manag 162(3):211–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Poelsma P, McCarthy D, Deletic A (2010) Changes in the infiltration rate of a novel stormwater harvesting system: impacts of clogging and moisture content. Proceedings of NOVATECH, Lyon p 1–6

  • Ranieri V, Antonacci MC, Ying G, Sansalone JJ (2010) Application of Kozeny- Kovacs model to predict the hydraulic conductivity of permeable pavements. J Transpor Res Board 2195:168–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read J, Fletcher TD, Wevill T, Deletic A (2010) Plant traits that enhance pollutant removal from stormwater in biofiltration systems. Int J Phytoremed 12(1):34–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddi LN, Ming X, Hajra MG, Lee IM (2000) Permeability reduction of soil filter due to physical clogging. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 126(3):236–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roldin M, Mark O, Kuczera G, Mikkelsen PS, Binning PJ (2012) Representing soakaways in a physically distributed urban drainage model –upscaling individual allotments to an aggregated scale. J Hydrol 414–415:530–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy HA, Wenger JS, Fletcher TD, Walsh JC, Ladson RA, Shuster DW, Thurston WH, Brown RR (2008) Impediments and solutions to sustainable, watershed-scale urban stormwater management: lessons from Australia and the United States. Environ Manag 42(2):344–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusciano GM, Obropta CC (2007) Bio-retention column study: fecal coliform and total suspended solids reductions. Trans ASABE 50(4):1261–1269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarukkalige R, Priddle S, Gamage D (2012) Evaluation of the impacts of the land use on storm water quality: case study from Western Australia. Int J Environ Sci Develop 3(1):20–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott P, Santos R, Argue JR (1999) Performance, environmental and cost comparisons of OSD and OSR in re-development catchments. Water Sci Technol 39(2):33–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Segaran RR, Lewis M, Ostendorf B (2014) Stormwater quality improvement potential of an urbanised catchment using water sensitive retrofits into public parks. Urb For Urb Green 13(2):315–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seybert T (2006) Stormwater management for land development: methods and calculations for quantity control. Wiley, Hoboken

  • Sharma AK, Gray S, Diaper C, Liston P, Howe C (2008) Assessing integrated water management options for urban developments-Canberra case study. Urb Water 5(2):147–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma AK, Stephen C, Tjandraatmadja G, Gregory A (2012) Impediments and constraints in the uptake of water sensitive urban design measures in Greenfield and infill developments. Water Sci Technol 65(2):340–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd S (2008) Breaking down the barriers to better urban water management in WA. Aust Plann 45(2):20–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva A, Nascimento N, Seidl M, Vieira L (2010) SWITCH in Belo Horizonte, Brazil: infiltration and detention systems for more sustainable stormwater control in Belo Horizonte. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 9(1):7–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siriwardene NR, Deletic A, Fletcher TD (2007) Clogging of stormwater gravel infiltration systems and filters: insights from a laboratory study. Water Res 41(7):1433–1440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stagge JH, Davis AP, Jamil E, Kim H (2012) Performance of grass swales for improving water quality from highway runoff. Water Res 20(15):6731–6742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starke P, Gobel P, Coldewey WG (2011) Effects on evaporation rates from different water-permeable pavement designs. Water Sci Technol 63(11):2619–2627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun X, Davis AP (2007) Heavy metal fates in laboratory bioretention systems. Chemosphere 66(9):1601–1609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swan A (2010) How increased urbanisation has induced flooding problems in the UK: a lesson for African cities? Phys Chem Earth 35(14):643–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tam VWY, Tam L, Zeng SX (2010) Cost effectiveness and trade off on the use of rainwater tank: an empirical study in Australian residential decision-making. Resour Conserv Recycl 54(3): 178–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tennakoon A, Argue JR (2011) Managing urban regrowth with an ‘at capacity’ stormwater infrastructure. Proceedings of the 34th IAHR World Congress and 33rd Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium, Brisbane p 2720–2727

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson AM, Paul AC, Balster NJ (2008) Physical and hydraulic properties of engineered soil media for bioretention basins. Trans ASABE 51(2):499–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trowsdale SA, Simcock R (2011) Urban stormwater treatment using bioretention. J Hydrol 397(3–4):167–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullate EG, Lopez EC, Fresno DC, Bayon JR (2011) Analysis and contrast of different pervious pavements for management of storm-water in parking area in Northern Spain. Water Resour Manag 25(6):1525–1535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urrutiaguer M, Lloyd S, Lamshed S (2010) Determining water sensitive urban design projects benefits using a multi-criteria assessment tool. Water Sci Technol 61(9):2333–2341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vernon B, Tiwari R (2009) Place-making through water sensitive urban design. Sustainability 1(4):789–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villarreal EL, Dixon A (2010) A analysis of rainwater collection system for domestic water supply in Ringdansen, Norrkoping, Sweden. Build Environ 40(9):1174–1184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warnaars E, Larsen AV, Jacobsen P, Mikkelsen PS (1999) Hydrologic behaviour of stormwater infiltration trenches in a central urban area during 23/4 years of operation. Water Sci Technol 39(2):217–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong T (2006) An overview of water sensitive urban design in Australia. Water Pract Technol (online). doi:10.2166/WPT.2006018

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong T, Brown R, Deletic A (2008) Water management in water sensitive city. Water 35(7):52–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Whelans C, Halpern GM, Thompson P (1994) Planning and management guidelines for water sensitive urban (residential) design. The Water Authority of Western Australia

  • Yang H, Florence DC, McCoy EL, Dick WA, Grewal PS (2009) Design and hydraulic characteristics of a field scale bi-phasic bioretention rain garden system for stormwater management. Water Sci Technol 59(9):1863–1872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yazdi SK, Scholz M (2008) Combined bio-filtration, water detention and infiltration system treating road runoff. Proceedings of the 10th British Hydrological Symposium, Exeter p 353–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Yong CF, Deletic A, Fletcher TD, Grace MR (2008) The clogging behaviour and treatment efficiency of a range of porous pavements. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Urban Drainage, Scotland, pp 1–10

  • Younos T (2011) Paradigm shift: holistic approach for water management in urban environments. Front Earth Sci 5(4):421–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu SL, Stanford RL (2007) Field evaluation of a stormwater bioretention filtration system. J Environ Eng Manag 17(1):63–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu SL, Kuo JT, Fassman EA, Pan H (2001) Field test of grassed-swale performance in removing runoff pollution. J Water Resour Plann Manag 127(3):168–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang MH, Li H (2011) Pore structure and chloride permeability of concrete containing nano-particles for pavement. Constr Build Mater 25(2):608–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Grant A, Sharma A, Chen D, Chen L (2010) Alternative water resources for rural residential development in Western Australia. Water Resources. Management 24(1):25–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Rengel Z, Liaghati T, Antoniette T, Meney K (2011) Influence of plant species and submerged zone with carbon addiction on nutrient removal in stormwater bio-filter. Ecol Eng 37(11):1833–1841

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Natural and Built Environments, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes Campus, Adelaide, SA, 5095, Australia

    Faisal Ahammed

Authors
  1. Faisal Ahammed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Faisal Ahammed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahammed, F. A review of water-sensitive urban design technologies and practices for sustainable stormwater management. Sustain. Water Resour. Manag. 3, 269–282 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-017-0093-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-017-0093-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation