Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Schematization of Cannulated Screw Fixations in Femoral Neck Fractures Using Genetic Algorithm and Finite Element Method

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Femoral neck fracture (FNF) is one of the most observed orthopedic injuries in elderly patients with accompanying osteoporosis, while treatment process could be highly troublesome in young patients. Therefore, it is necessary to apply a strong fixation to the FNFs. This study aims to suggest an approach for the optimum screw design for FNFs using genetic algorithm (GA) and finite element method (FEM) in a seriously shorter time, considering that a very large number for the design of the implants comes forward that would take a lifetime to solve individually.

Methods

In biomechanical studies conducted under laboratory conditions and focusing on stabilization, limited number of combinations have been tested with limited materials by now. However, ideal position, size and number of the screws are still subject of discussion. Unlike previous biomechanical studies; the present study addresses three types of CSFs (binary screw, triple screw and quadruple screw), while aiming to determine the optimum position, size and number of the screws using a design approach based on GA and FEM.

Results

This study emphasizes that screw configuration plays an important role on the treatment process of the femur. As a result of all evaluations and analyses, the most effective designs have been achieved for binary, triple and quadruple screw patterns.

Conclusion

In this study, all of the possible combinations and screw sizes have been evaluated to determine the optimum conditions for fracture stability. Suggested design approach could be used more effectively by healthcare disciplines such as orthopedics, in which biomechanical principles are significant. Moreover, cooperation between structural and biomechanical engineering is another remarkable eligibility of this research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sandhu, H. S., Dhillon, M. S., & Jain, A. K. (2008). Femoral neck fractures. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 42(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.38573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sensoz, E., Özkal, F. M., Acar, V., & Cakir, F. (2018). Finite element analysis of the impact of screw insertion distal to the trochanter minor on the risk of iatrogenic subtrochanteric fracture. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 232(8), 807–818. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954411918789963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kemker, B., Magone, K., Owen, J., & Atkinson, P. (2017). Martin S & Atkinson TA sliding hip screw augmented with 2 screws is biomechanically similar to an inverted triad of cannulated screws in repair of a Pauwels type-III fracture. Injury, 48(8), 1743–1748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2017.05.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Schaefer, T. K., Spross, C., Stoffel, K. K., & Yates, P. J. (2015). Biomechanical properties of a posterior fully threaded positioning screw for cannulated screw fixation of displaced neck of femur fractures. Injury, 46(11), 2130–2133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2015.07.021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mei, J., Liu, S., Jia, G., Cui, X., Jiang, C., & Ou, Y. (2014). Finite element analysis of the effect of cannulated screw placement and drilling frequency on femoral neck fracture fixation. Injury, 45(12), 2045–2050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2014.07.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rooney, A., & Rollitt, N. (2013). Investigation into the outcomes following fixation of fractured neck of femurs with cannulated hip screws. International Journal of Surgery, 11(8), 663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.06.409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Holland, J. H. (1975). Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goldberg, D. E. (1989). Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley Publishing.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Walker, M., & Smith, R. E. (2003). A technique for the multiobjective optimisation of laminated composite structures using genetic algorithms and finite element analysis. Composite Structures, 62(1), 123–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(03)00098-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Singh, S., Agrawal, S., Tiwari, A., Al-Helal, I. M., & Avasthi, D. V. (2015). Modeling and parameter optimization of hybrid single channel photovoltaic thermal module using genetic algorithms. Solar Energy, 113, 78–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2014.12.031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Aydın, Z. (2006). Öngerilmeli beton kirişli köprü üstyapılarının genetik algoritma ile optimum tasarımı. PhD Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Turkey.

  12. Nehdi, M., & Nikopour, H. (2011). Genetic algorithm model for shear capacity of RC beams reinforced with externally bonded FRP. Materials and Structures, 44, 1249–1258. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-010-9697-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Croce, F. D., Tadei, R., & Volta, G. (1995). A genetic algorithm for the job shop problem. Computers & Operations Research, 22(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(93)E0015-L.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Deliktaş, B., Bikçe, M., Coşkun, H., & Türker, H. T. (2009). Betonarme kirişlerin optimum tasarımında genetik algoritma parametrelerinin etkisinin belirlenmesi. Fırat University Journal of Engineering Science, 21(2), 125–132.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shukla, A., Pandey, H. M., & Mehrotra, D. (2015). Comparative review of selection techniques in genetic algorithm. In 1st International conference on futuristic trend in computational analysis and knowledge management (ABLAZE-2015) (pp. 515–519).

  16. Melanie, M. (1998). An introduction to genetic algorithms. London: The MIT Press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. De Jong, K., & Spears, W. (1992). A formal analysis of the role of multi-point crossover. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 5, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hassanat, A., Almohammadi, K., Alkafaween, E., Abunawas, E., Hammouri, A., & Prasath, V. B. S. (2019). Choosing mutation and crossover ratios for genetic algorithms—A review with a new dynamic approach. Information, 10, 390. https://doi.org/10.3390/info10120390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Saruhan, H. (2004). Genetic algorithms: An optimization technique. Teknoloji, 7(1), 105–114.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gürünlü Alma, Ö. (2009). Genetic algorithm based outlier detection using information criterion. PhD thesis, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir, Turkey.

  21. Eiben, E., Michalewicz, Z., Schoenauer, M., & Smith, J. E. (2007). Parameter control in evolutionary algorithms. In Parameter setting in evolutionary algorithms (pp. 19–46). Berlin: Springer.

  22. Hong, T. P., & Hong-Shung, W. (1996). A dynamic mutation genetic algorithm. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 3, 2000–2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sarmady, S. (2007). An investigation on genetic algorithm parameters. Technical Report, School of Computer Science (p. 126). Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia.

  24. Goldberg, D. E. (1985). Optimal initial population size for binary coded genetic algorithms. TCGA Report 85001, The Clearinghouse for Genetic Algorithms, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, USA.

  25. Hesser, J., Männer, R., & Stucky, O. (1991). On Steiner trees and genetic algorithms. In Parallelism, learning, evolution (pp. 509–525). Berlin: Springer.

  26. East, I. R., & Rowe, J. (1996). Effects of isolation in a distributed population genetic algorithm. In International conference on evolutionary computation–the 4th international conference on parallel problem solving from nature—PPSN IV (pp. 408–419). Berlin: Springer.

  27. Schep, N. W. L., Heintjes, R. J., Martens, E. P., van Dortmont, L. M. C., & van Vugt, A. B. (2004). Retrospective analysis of factors influencing the operative result after percutaneous osteosynthesis of intracapsular femoral neck fractures. Injury, 35(10), 1003–1009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2003.07.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lindequist, S. (1993). Cortical screw support in femoral neck fractures. A radiographic analysis of 87 fractures with a new mensuration technique. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 64(3), 289–293. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679308993627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Özkal, F. M., & Uysal, H. (2010). A new performance index formulation aiming to attain fully stressed designs for topology optimization problems. Scientific Research and Essays, 5(15), 2027–2036.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Özkal, F. M., Cakir, F., & Arkun, A. K. (2016). Finite element method for optimum design selection of carport structures under multiple load cases. Advances in Production Engineering & Management, 11(4), 287–298. https://doi.org/10.14743/apem2016.4.227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Özkal, F. M., & Uysal, H. (2012). A fully stressed design method to determine the optimum strut-and-tie model for beam-column connections. International Journal of Computational Methods, 9(3), 1250035. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219876212500351.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Günel U. Biomechanics of the hip joint. Editor Ege R: Hip Surgery and Problems. Ankara, Turkey: THK Printing House 1st edition (Turkish), 1994; 53–61.

  33. Bayraktar HH, Morgan EF, Niebur GL Morris GE, Wong EK & Keaveny TM. Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue. Journal of Biomechanics 2004; 37(1): 27–35.

  34. Wang, J. (2005). Finite element analysis in the study of biomechanics of fracture. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, 8, 283–285.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Bessho, M., Ohnishi, I., Matsuyama, J., Matsumoto, T., Imai, K., & Nakamura, K. (2007). Prediction of strength and strain of the proximal femur by a CT-based finite element method. Journal of Biomechanics, 40(8), 1745–1753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.08.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Varga, P., Baumbach, S., Pahr, D. H., Charlebois, M., & Zysset, P. K. (2009). Validation of an anatomy-specific finite element model of Colle’s fracture. Journal of Biomechanics, 42(11), 1726–1731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.04.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Varga, P., Pahr, D. H., Baumbach, S., & Zysset, P. K. (2010). HR-pQCT based FE analysis of the most distal radius section provides an improved prediction of Colles’ fracture load in vitro. Bone, 47(5), 982–988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2010.08.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hoffler, C. E., Moore, K. E., Kozloff, K., Zysset, P. K., Brown, M. B., & Goldstein, S. A. (2000). Heterogeneity of bone lamellar-level elastic moduli. Bone, 26(6), 603–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zysset, P. K., Dallara, E., Varga, P., & Pahr, D. H. (2013). Finite element analysis for prediction of bone strength. BoneKEy Reports, 2, 386. https://doi.org/10.1038/bonekey.2013.120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Xu, M., Yang, J., Lieberman, I. H., & Haddas, R. (2019). Finite element method-based study of pedicle screw-bone connection in pullout test and physiological spinal loads. Medical Engineering & Physics, 67, 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2019.03.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kruszewski A, Piekarczyk P, Kwiatkowski K & Piszczatowski S. biomechanical evaluation of the stabilization used in the treatment of distal humerus intra-articular fractures. First European Biomedical Engineering Conference for Young Investigators, ENCY2015, Budapest, May 28–30, 2015.

  42. Ambati, D. V., Wright, E. K., Jr., Lehman, R. A., Jr., Kang, D. G., Wagner, S. C., & Dmitriev, A. E. (2015). Bilateral pedicle screw fixation provides superior biomechanical stability in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element study. The Spine Journal, 15(8), 1812–1822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2014.06.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ayturk, U. M., & Puttlitz, C. M. (2011). Parametric convergence sensitivity and validation of a finite element model of the human lumbar spine. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 14(8), 695–705. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2010.493517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Rohlmann, A., Boustani, H. N., Bergmann, G., & Zander, T. (2010). Effect of a pedicle-screw-based motion preservation system on lumbar spine biomechanics: a probabilistic finite element study with subsequent sensitivity analysis. Journal of Biomechanics, 43(15), 2963–2969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.07.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Rohlmann, A., Burra, N. K., Zander, T., & Bergmann, G. (2007). Comparison of the effects of bilateral posterior dynamic and rigid fixation devices on the loads in the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis. European Spine Journal, 16(8), 1223–1231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0292-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Chen, S. I., Lin, R. M., & Chang, C. H. (2003). Biomechanical investigation of pedicle screw-vertebrae complex: a finite element approach using bonded and contact interface conditions. Medical Engineering & Physics, 25(4), 275–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1350-4533(02)00219-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Lenz, M., Gueorguiev, B., Joseph, S., Van Pol Der, B., Richards, R. G., Windolf, M., et al. (2012). Angulated locking plate in periprosthetic proximal femur fractures: biomechanical testing of a new prototype plate. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 132, 1437–1444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-012-1556-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Shah, S., Kim, S. Y. R., Dubov, A., Schemitsch, E. H., Bougherara, H., & Zdero, R. (2011). The biomechanics of plate fixation of periprosthetic femoral fractures near the tip of a total hip implant: cables, screws, or both? Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 225, 845–856. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954411911413060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Dubov, A., Kim, S. Y. R., Shah, S., Schemitsch, E. H., Zdero, R., & Bougherara, H. (2011). The biomechanics of plate repair of periprosthetic femur fractures near the tip of a total hip implant: the effect of cable-screw position. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 225, 857–865. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954411911410642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Maurer, S. G., Wright, K. E., Kummer, F. J., Zuckerman, J. D., & Koval, K. J. (2003). Two or three screws for fixation of femoral neck fractures? American Journal of Orthopedics (Belle Mead NJ), 32(9), 438–442.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Xarchas, K. C., Staikos, C. D., Pelekas, S., Vogiatzaki, T., Kazakos, K. J., & Verettas, D. A. (2007). Are two screws enough for fixation of femoral neck fractures? A Case series and review of the literature. The Open Orthopaedics Journal, 1, 4–8. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874325000701010004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Walker, E., Mukherjee, D. P., Ogden, A. L., Sadasivan, K. K., & Albright, J. A. (2007). A biomechanical study of simulated femoral neck fracture fixation by cannulated screws: Effects of placement angle and number of screws. American Journal of Orthopedics (Belle Mead NJ), 36, 680–684.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Wu, C. C. (2010). Using biomechanics to improve the surgical technique for internal fixation of intracapsular femoral neck fractures. Chang Gung Medical Journal, 33(3), 241–251.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Ly TV & Swiontkowski MF. Treatment of femoral neck fractures in young adults. In: Azar FM, ed. Instructional Course Lectures. Vol. 58. IL, U.S.A.: American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, 2009; 69–81.

  55. Gurusamy, K., Parker, M. J., & Rowlands, T. K. (2005). The complications of displaced intracapsular fractures of the hip: The effect of screw positioning and angulation on fracture healing. The Bone & Joint Journal, 87(5), 632–634. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.87B5.15237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Yang, J. J., Lin, L. C., Chao, K. H., Chuang, S. Y., Wu, C. C., Yeh, T. T., et al. (2013). Risk factors for nonunion in patients with intracapsular femoral neck fractures treated with three cannulated screws placed in either a triangle or an inverted triangle configuration. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 95(1), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.K.01081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Satish, B. R., Ranganadham, A. V., Ramalingam, K., & Tripathy, S. K. (2013). Four quadrant parallel peripheral screw fixation for displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 47(2), 174–181. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.108912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Gümüstas, S. A., Tosun, H. B., Air, I., Orak, M. M., Onay, T., & Okçu, G. (2014). Influence of number and orientation of screws on stability in the internal fixation of unstable femoral neck fractures. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, 48(6), 673–678. https://doi.org/10.3944/AOTT.2014.14.0088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Rajnish, R. K., Haq, R. U., Aggarwal, A. N., Verma, N., Pandey, R., & Bhayana, H. (2019). Four screws diamond configuration fixation for displaced, comminuted intracapsular fracture neck femur in young adults. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 53(1), 70–76. https://doi.org/10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_333_17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study has not received any funding from any institution/organization.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey

    Fatih Mehmet Özkal

  2. Department of Civil Engineering, Istanbul Aydin University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Ferit Cakir

  3. Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Dr. Lutfi Kırdar Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

    Ersin Sensoz

Authors
  1. Fatih Mehmet Özkal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ferit Cakir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ersin Sensoz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fatih Mehmet Özkal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Özkal, F.M., Cakir, F. & Sensoz, E. Schematization of Cannulated Screw Fixations in Femoral Neck Fractures Using Genetic Algorithm and Finite Element Method. J. Med. Biol. Eng. 40, 673–687 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-020-00528-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-020-00528-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation